Abnormalities of Psychomotor Development in Schizophrenia: A Rehabilitation Perspective

1992 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 747-753 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcella Provenza ◽  
Simona Di Rosa ◽  
Paolo Cavedini ◽  
Francesca Tosoni ◽  
Monica Alietti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Test Battery ◽  
Psychomotor Development ◽  
Inherent Feature ◽  
Schizophrenic Patients

This study was an evaluation of the psychomotor profiles of 22 schizophrenic patients, investigated by means of a test battery developed for the assessment of psychomotor profiles of 10- to 12-year-old children. Analysis indicates chat abnormal psychomotor development is an inherent feature of the disease and probably is antecedent to a full psychopathological picture.

Halstead-Reitan Test Battery: A Problem of Differential Diagnosis

1980 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 611-630
Author(s):  
Irmingard I. Lenzer
Keyword(s):  
Brain Damage ◽  
Test Performance ◽  
Construct Validation ◽  
Neuropsychological Test ◽  
Summary Score ◽  
Test Battery ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
Test Taking ◽  
Limited Applicability ◽  
Schizophrenic Patients

The Halstead-Reitan Test Battery is one of the most widely recognized neuropsychological test batteries. Many claims have been made as to its validity. Despite these claims, doubts persist. A critical review of the literature shows that the battery can separate brain-damaged patients from normal patients, general medical patients, and patients with certain psychiatric disorders. However, the battery cannot separate brain-damaged patients as a group from schizophrenics as a group, though in individual cases there may exist pathognomonic signs indicating brain damage. The impairment index, as a summary score of the basic tests, as well as other “methods of inference,” fail at this point. Four alternatives are discussed. First, brain-damaged patients differ from schizophrenic patients not in test performance but in test-taking behavior. Second, the battery is a valid measure of brain damage but has limited applicability. Third, the battery is a measure not of brain damage but of degree of degradation of psychological processes. And fourth, schizophrenics perform poorly on the battery because they have undetected brain damage. Only the third and fourth alternatives appear viable. Both question the validity of the traditional criteria of brain damage. It is argued that future validation studies of the battery should be of construct validation type and not of the criterion-oriented type, as these are defined by Cronbach and Meehl (1955). Possible procedures for construct validation are briefly discussed.

Patterns of Dysfunction in Schizophrenic Patients on an Aphasia Test Battery

1977 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 498-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank G. DiSimoni ◽  
Frederic L. Darley ◽  
Arnold E. Aronson
Keyword(s):  
Neurologic Deficit ◽  
Test Battery ◽  
Apraxia Of Speech ◽  
Intellectual Impairment ◽  
Language Performance ◽  
Schizophrenic Patients

Twenty-seven schizophrenic patients free of any known neurologic deficit were tested with an aphasia test battery. The objective of the research was to derive a profile of schizophrenic language performance to permit its comparison with the profiles characteristic of aphasia, apraxia of speech, generalized intellectual impairment, and confused language. Results indicate that schizophrenic patients exhibit a profile of language performance distinctive from those found in aphasia, apraxia of speech, confusion, or generalized intellectual impairment and demonstrate that the disruption of language in schizophrenia is not aphasic in nature.

scholarly journals High Order Linguistic Features Such as Ambiguity Processing as Relevant Diagnostic Markers for Schizophrenia

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Ketteler ◽  
Anastasia Theodoridou ◽  
Simon Ketteler ◽  
Matthias Jäger
Keyword(s):  
High Order ◽  
Test Battery ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Linguistic Features ◽  
Performance Deficits ◽  
Linguistic Performance ◽  
Order Language ◽  
Function Test ◽  
Schizophrenic Patients ◽  
Schizophrenic Group

Due to the deficits of schizophrenic patients regarding the understanding of vague meanings (D. Ketteler and S. Ketteler (2010)) we develop a special test battery called HOLF (high order linguistic function test), which should be able to detect subtle linguistic performance deficits in schizophrenic patients. HOLF was presented to 40 schizophrenic patients and controls, focussing on linguistic features such as ambiguity, synonymy, hypero-/hyponymy, antinomy, and adages. Using the HOLF test battery we found that schizophrenic patients showed significant difficulties in discriminating ambiguities, hypero- and hyponymy, or synonymy compared to healthy controls. Antonyms and adages showed less significant results in comparing both groups. The more difficult a linguistic task was, the more confusion was measured in the schizophrenic group while healthy controls did not show significant problems in processing high order language tasks.

The Diagnostic Significance of Overinclusive Thinking in an Unselected Psychiatric Population

1972 ◽  
Vol 120 (555) ◽  
pp. 173-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. W. Payne ◽  
D. V. Hawks ◽  
D. Friedlander ◽  
D. S. Hart
Keyword(s):  
Normal Subjects ◽  
Operational Definition ◽  
Standard Test ◽  
Test Battery ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Diagnostic Significance ◽  
Schizophrenic Patients ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Sorting Test

Cameron (1938, 1939) suggested that schizophrenic thought disorder is largely the result of overinclusive thinking, which he defined as the inability to preserve conceptual boundaries. Payne, Matussek and George (1959) developed a battery of objective measures of overinclusive thinking, which they found differentiated between an acute schizophrenic and a neurotic control group. Payne and Hewlett (1960) found that a battery of tests of overinclusive thinking intercorrelated as expected. They were able to obtain a factor score from their overinclusion test battery which differentiated a group of acute schizophrenic patients from control groups of depressives, neurotics and normal subjects. Payne and Friedlander (1962), on the basis of this factorial study, suggested a short battery of three measures of overinclusive thinking consisting of the number of ‘Non-A’ or unusual responses to the Object Classification Test (Payne, 1962), the average number of words used in explaining the Benjamin Proverbs given under special 'stress free’ instructions, and the average number of objects classified together in the ‘handing over’ section of the Goldstein-Scheerer Object Sorting Test. This standard test battery has been the operational definition of overinclusive thinking in a number of studies. Only one study of the reliability of this test battery appears to have been carried out. Hawks and Payne (1971) report the correlations obtained from a group of 54 psychiatric inpatients who were retested after a 4-day interval. The test-retest correlation coefficient (uncorrected) obtained from the Combined Transformed score (Payne and Friedlander, 1962) was 0 · 87. The reliabilities of the individual tests ranged from 0·77 to 0·86.

Objective Assessment of Hearing in Children: Update on Procedures and Protocols

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 50-58
Author(s):  
James W. Hall ◽  
Anuradha R. Bantwal
Keyword(s):  
Psychosocial Development ◽  
Otoacoustic Emissions ◽  
Objective Assessment ◽  
Behavioral Assessment ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Test Battery ◽  
Auditory Evoked Responses ◽  
Brainstem Response ◽  
Assessment Techniques ◽  
Pediatric Populations

Early identification and diagnosis of hearing loss in infants and young children is the first step toward appropriate and effective intervention and is critical for optimal communicative and psychosocial development. Limitations of behavioral assessment techniques in pediatric populations necessitate the use of an objective test battery to enable complete and accurate assessment of auditory function. Since the introduction of the cross-check principle 35 years ago, the pediatric diagnostic test battery has expanded to include, in addition to behavioral audiometry, acoustic immittance measures, otoacoustic emissions, and multiple auditory evoked responses (auditory brainstem response, auditory steady state response, and electrocochleography). We offer a concise description of a modern evidence-based audiological test battery that permits early and accurate diagnosis of auditory dysfunction.

Psychomotor development and minor anomolies in children exposed to antiepileptic drugs in utero: a population-based study

2000 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 356-356
Author(s):  
Katarina Wide ◽  
Birger Winbladh ◽  
Torbjörn Tomson ◽  
Kerstin Sars-Zimmer ◽  
Eva Berggren
Keyword(s):  
Antiepileptic Drugs ◽  
Population Based ◽  
In Utero ◽  
Psychomotor Development ◽  
Population Based Study

The self and schizophrenia: a cognitive approach

2003 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marek Nieznanski
Keyword(s):  
Normal Subjects ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Cognitive Approach ◽  
Schizophrenic Patients ◽  
Self Schema ◽  
Persons With Schizophrenia ◽  
Basic Features ◽  
Trait Words ◽  
Patients Experience ◽  
Normal Controls

The aim of the study was to explore the basic features of self-schema in persons with schizophrenia. Thirty two schizophrenic patients and 32 normal controls were asked to select personality trait words from a check-list that described themselves, themselves as they were five years ago, and what most people are like. Compared with the control group, participants from the experimental group chose significantly more adjectives that were common to descriptions of self and others, and significantly less that were common to self and past-self descriptions. These results suggest that schizophrenic patients experience their personality as changing over time much more than do healthy subjects. Moreover, their self-representation seems to be less differentiated from others-representation and less clearly defined than in normal subjects.

Kognitive Defizite bei Schizophren Erkrankten

2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Almut Carolus ◽  
Petia Popova ◽  
Brigitte Rockstroh
Keyword(s):  
Test Battery ◽  
Cognitive Test ◽  
Kognitive Defizite ◽  
Kognitive Funktionen

Zusammenfassung. Theoretischer Hintergrund: Kognitive Funktionseinschränkungen sind zentrales Merkmal schizophrener Erkrankungen und werden entsprechend im Behandlungskonzept berücksichtigt. Kognitive Remediationsprogramme gelten als wirksam, Effektstärken als moderat. Trainingsvarianten werden zur Effektoptimierung erprobt. Fragestellung: Ist gezieltes Funktionstraining in neuroplastizitäts-orientiertem Lernkontext effektiver als breitgefächertes Behandlungsprogramm und werden Effekte durch das Erkrankungsstadium moduliert? Methode: Bei 59 chronisch und 31 ersthospitalisierten schizophren Erkrankten wurden kognitive Defizite über Testleistungen der MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Test Battery gegenüber 25 gesunder Kontrollpersonen erfasst. Testleistungen vor, nach 4-wöchiger Interventionsphase mit zwei spezifischen Trainings oder Standardbehandlung und 3-monatiger Katamnese prüften den Einfluss von Interventionstypus und Erkrankungsstadium auf Leistungsverbesserung. Ergebnisse: Sowohl chronische wie erstmals behandelte Patienten aller Behandlungsgruppen verbesserten sich signifikant über die Messzeitpunkte, obwohl Defizite relativ zu Kontrollen fortbestanden. Schlussfolgerungen: Spezifisches Training verbessert kognitive Funktionen nicht über Zeit/Remissionseffekte hinaus.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document