Establishing Validity of Anagram Verbalization

1974 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 359-366
Author(s):  
Steven M. Rosen ◽  
Harvey B. Taub

Underwood's (1965) false recognition procedure was adapted to validate the method of anagram verbalization. Overt anagram verbalizations collected from 10 Ss during an earlier study were presented with varying frequency as sound stimuli to a second sample, after the same anagrams were attempted covertly. Following the stimulus list, the second sample of Ss ( N = 29) estimated the number of times each sound had been read. Frequency judgments of sounds which had occurred commonly among Ss in the previous study were significantly greater than judgments of sounds occurring only once in the first sample. It is concluded that sounds which appeared frequently on an overt basis also occurred covertly, inflating subsequent estimates of list occurrence. The findings are interpreted as validating the method of anagram verbalization.

Author(s):  
Matthew P. Gerrie ◽  
Maryanne Garry

When people see movies with some parts missing, they falsely recognize many of the missing parts later. In two experiments, we examined the effect of warnings on people’s false memories for these parts. In Experiment 1, warning subjects about false recognition before the movie (forewarnings) reduced false recognition, but warning them after the movie (postwarnings) reduced false recognition to a lesser extent. In Experiment 2, the effect of the warnings depended on the nature of the missing parts. Forewarnings were more effective than postwarnings in reducing false recognition of missing noncrucial parts, but forewarnings and postwarnings were similarly effective in reducing false recognition of crucial missing parts. We use the source monitoring framework to explain our results.


2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha D. Amberg ◽  
John P. Taylor ◽  
Susan Hambrick ◽  
William P. Wallace
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document