scholarly journals Impact of Intravenous Fluids and Enteral Nutrition on the Severity of Gastrointestinal Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-24
Author(s):  
Varsha M. Asrani ◽  
Annabelle Brown ◽  
Ian Bissett ◽  
John A. Windsor

AbstractIntroductionGastrointestinal dysfunction (GDF) is one of the primary causes of morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. Intensive care interventions, such as intravenous fluids and enteral feeding, can exacerbate GDF. There exists a paucity of high-quality literature on the interaction between these two modalities (intravenous fluids and enteral feeding) as a combined therapy on its impact on GDF.AimTo review the impact of intravenous fluids and enteral nutrition individually on determinants of gut function and implications in clinical practice.MethodsRandomized controlled trials on intravenous fluids and enteral feeding on GDF were identified by a comprehensive database search of MEDLINE and EMBASE. Extraction of data was conducted for study characteristics, provision of fluids or feeding in both groups and quality of studies was assessed using the Cochrane criteria. A random-effects model was applied to estimate the impact of these interventions across the spectrum of GDF severity.ResultsRestricted/ goal-directed intravenous fluid therapy is likely to reduce ‘mild’ GDF such as vomiting (p = 0.03) compared to a standard/ liberal intravenous fluid regime. Enterally fed patients experienced increased episodes of vomiting (p = <0.01) but were less likely to develop an anastomotic leak (p = 0.03) and peritonitis (p = 0.03) compared to parenterally fed patients. Vomiting (p = <0.01) and anastomotic leak (p = 0.04) were significantly lower in the early enteral feeding group.ConclusionsThere is less emphasis on the combined approach of intravenous fluid resuscitation and enteral feeding in critically ill patients. Conservative fluid resuscitation and aggressive enteral feeding are presumably key factors contributing to severe life-threatening GDF. Future trials should evaluate the impact of cross-interaction between conservative and aggressive modes of these two interventions on the severity of GDF.

2018 ◽  
Vol Volume 14 ◽  
pp. 385-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayse Gulsah Atasever ◽  
Perihan Ergin ozcan ◽  
Kamber Kasali ◽  
Taner Abdullah ◽  
Gunseli Orhun ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 179-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex C. Cech ◽  
Jon B. Morris ◽  
James L. Mullen ◽  
Gary W. Crooks

Aspiration pneumonia is a serious complication of enteral feeding. Many critically ill patients are particularly at risk for aspiration. Few studies have rigorously compared various access devices. Risk factors for aspiration and studies examining aspiration associated with enteral feeding devices are reviewed. We recommend a surgical jejunostomy for all patients at high risk for aspiration who require more than 3 weeks of enteral nutrition support.


2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (12) ◽  
pp. 145-145
Author(s):  
Ordessia Charran ◽  
Sherif Elmahdy ◽  
Matthew Schreiber

2008 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 1469-1474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nam Q. Nguyen ◽  
Robert J. Fraser ◽  
Laura K. Bryant ◽  
Carly Burgstad ◽  
Marianne J. Chapman ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 131-134
Author(s):  
Leonid Koyfman ◽  
Andrei Schwartz ◽  
Yair Benjamin ◽  
Alexander Smolikov ◽  
Moti Klein ◽  
...  

Abstract Enteral nutrition is crucial for ensuring that critically ill patients have a proper intake of food, water, and medicine. Methods to ensure this requirement should be initiated as early as possible. The use of PPF has several advantages compared to the use of a nasogastric feeding tube. In the present paper, the cases of three critically ill patients with a nonfunctional gastrointestinal system on admission to ICU, are detailed. Enteral feeding through a nasogastric tube by prokinetic agent therapy had been unsuccessful. The bedside placement of a post-pyloric feeding tube by the DRX-Revolution X-ray system is described.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document