gastrointestinal injury
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

205
(FIVE YEARS 59)

H-INDEX

27
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (34) ◽  
pp. 10451-10463
Author(s):  
Shi-Hao Mao ◽  
Dan-Dan Feng ◽  
Xi Wang ◽  
Yi-Hui Zhi ◽  
Shu Lei ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Nitin Dhochak ◽  
Alka Singh ◽  
Rohan Malik ◽  
Kana R Jat ◽  
Jhuma Sankar ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca C. Bishop ◽  
Ann M. Kemper ◽  
Pamela A. Wilkins ◽  
Annette M. McCoy

Biomolecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1456
Author(s):  
Soumita Ghosh

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved antipyretic, anti-inflammatory, and analgesic drugs to mitigate pain, however it is associated with gastrointestinal injury and cardiovascular disease in some individuals. Metabolomics has the potential to understand the interaction of host and the drugs, such as NSAIDs administration. This discipline has been used by many researchers to understand the serious side effects of NSAIDs. We highlighted (1) the potential of metabolomics in understanding the pathogenesis of adverse events due to NSAIDs administration; (2) choice of metabolomics techniques, bio sample handling; (3) review of metabolomics studies in the front of NSAIDs in different biofluids and tissues; (4) pathway analysis of the data presented in the published literature. In our analysis we find tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA), “glycine serine and threonine metabolism,” “alanine, aspartate, and glutamate metabolism,” and fatty acid metabolism to be altered by the NSAIDs like ibuprofen, indomethacin, naproxen, aspirin, and celecoxib. In conclusion, metabolomics allows the use of biological samples to identify useful pathways involved in disease progression, and subsequently inform a greater understanding of the disease pathogenesis. A further in-depth investigation of the associated pathways mentioned above holds the potential for drug targets for side effects mitigation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wan-tong Zhang ◽  
Miao-ran Wang ◽  
Guo-dong Hua ◽  
Qiu-yan Li ◽  
Xu-jie Wang ◽  
...  

Background: Administration of aspirin has the potential for significant side effects of gastrointestinal (GI) injury mainly caused by gastric acid stimulation, especially in long-term users or users with original gastrointestinal diseases. The debate on the optimal treatment of aspirin-induced gastrointestinal injury is ongoing. We aimed to compare and rank the different treatments for aspirin-induced gastrointestinal injury based on current evidence.Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and Chinese databases for published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of different treatments for aspirin-induced gastrointestinal injury from inception to 1 May 2021. All of the direct and indirect evidence included was rated by network meta-analysis under a Bayesian framework.Results: A total of 10 RCTs, which comprised 503 participants, were included in the analysis. The overall quality of evidence was rated as moderate to high. Eleven different treatments, including omeprazole, lansoprazole, rabeprazole, famotidine, geranylgeranylacetone, misoprostol, ranitidine bismuth citrate, chili, phosphatidylcholine complex, omeprazole plus rebamipide, and placebo, were evaluated in terms of preventing gastrointestinal injury. It was suggested that omeprazole plus rebamipide outperformed other treatments, whereas geranylgeranylacetone and placebo were among the least treatments.Conclusion: This is the first systematic review and network meta-analysis of different treatments for aspirin-induced gastrointestinal injury. Our study suggested that omeprazole plus rebamipide might be considered the best option to treat aspirin-induced gastrointestinal injury. More multicenter, high quality, large sample size randomized controlled trials will confirm the advantages of these medicines in the treatment of aspirin-induced gastrointestinal injury in the future.


Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 100 (28) ◽  
pp. e26624
Author(s):  
Rong-Li Xie ◽  
Wei-Wei Chen ◽  
Meng-Zhi Qi ◽  
Dan Tan ◽  
Bing Zhao ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Bao-Chen Zhu ◽  
Chun-Miao Xue ◽  
Rui Lang ◽  
Wei-Liang Weng ◽  
Xu-Jie Wang ◽  
...  

Background. Aspirin is the first-line medication for prevention and treatment of coronary heart disease (CHD). However, long-term use of aspirin resulting in gastrointestinal mucosal injury and bleeding limits the regularity of medication. Xuesaitong is a marketed Chinese medicine contained main active component in Panax notoginseng saponins (PNS), which can significantly inhibit platelet aggregation in patients with CHD. Our previous studies have already showed that PNS could reduce the gastrointestinal mucosal injury caused by aspirin in preclinical study. However, there is a need for further clinical studies to evaluate synergy and attenuation effect of the combination. Methods. This trial is a prospectively planned, open-labeled, parallel-grouped, single-centered clinical trial. A total of eligible 480 participants will be randomly allocated into three groups: aspirin group, Xuesaitong group, and drug combination group at a ratio of 1 : 1 : 1. The primary outcome is the change of platelet aggregation rate and calprotectin activity. Secondary outcomes include PAC-1, P-selectin, P2Y12, I-FABP activity, and fecal occult blood. Discussion. The results of the study are expected to provide evidence of high methodological and reporting quality on the synergy function of Xuesaitong and aspirin upon the antiplatelet and anti-gastrointestinal injury effect for CHD. It also provides an experimental basis for clinical rational drug combination therapy. Trial Registration. This trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trail Registry, ChiCTR2000036311, on 22 August 2020, http://www.chictr.org.cn/edit.aspx?pid=58798&htm=4.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 590
Author(s):  
Jan Bures ◽  
Ilja Tacheci ◽  
Jaroslav Kvetina ◽  
Vera Radochova ◽  
Darina Kohoutova ◽  
...  

Galantamine has been used as a treatment for Alzheimer disease. It has a unique, dual mode of action (inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase and allosteric modulator of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors). Nausea (in about 20%), vomiting (10%) and diarrhoea (5–7%) are the most common side effects. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of galantamine on porcine gastric myoelectric activity without (Group A) and with (Group B) dextran sodium sulphate (DSS)-induced gastrointestinal injury. Galantamine hydrobromide was administrated to twelve pigs as a single intragastric dose (24 mg). Gastric myoelectric activity was investigated by electrogastrography (EGG). Basal (15 min before galantamine administration) and study recordings after galantamine administration (300 min) were evaluated using a running spectral analysis. Results were expressed as dominant frequency of gastric slow waves and power analysis (areas of amplitudes). Altogether, 3780 one-minute EGG recordings were evaluated. In Group A, power was steady from basal values for 180 min., then gradually decreased till 270 min. (p = 0.007). In Group B, there was a rapid gradual fall from basal values to those after 120 min. (p = 0.007) till 300 min. (p ˂ 0.001). In conclusion, galantamine alone revealed an unfavourable effect on porcine myoelectric activity assessed by gastric power. It can be a plausible explanation of galantamine-associated dyspepsia in humans. DSS caused further profound decrease of EGG power. That may indicate that underlying inflammatory, ischaemic or NSAIDs-induced condition of the intestine in humans can have aggravated the effect of galantamine on gastric myoelectric activity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document