scholarly journals Law Enforcement of Corruption Cases Through a Participatory Society as an Effort to Protect Constitutional Rights

Corruptio ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-112
Author(s):  
Diya Ul Akmal ◽  
Pipih Ludia Karsa ◽  
Syafrijal Mughni Madda

A participatory society can play an essential role in the prosecution of corruption cases. By providing information on alleged corruption, a participatory community can assist anti-corruption institutions so that corruption as an extraordinary crime can be eradicated as a means of enforcing people's constitutional rights. The authors attempt to perceive things by defending constitutional rights from a societal standpoint, a right of citizens who have had their rights violated by acts of corruption. The method used in this research is a normative legal method that refers to the norms in the laws and regulations, court decisions, and social society.  The data used is secondary data obtained from various sources with appropriate and relevant topics so that it becomes chaotic in discussing related problems. The community's active role in uncovering corruption cases is part of the obligation to break the chain of corruption and fulfil citizens' rights to enforce the law. The amount of budget allocated for disclosing corruption cases is leading the government to protect citizens' constitutional rights from the threat of corruption. Although the handling is still considered unsuccessful because many cases have not been revealed, the efforts made deserve to be recognised.

Author(s):  
S. B. Polyakov ◽  
◽  
I. A. Gilev ◽  

Introduction: we have created an information technology support program, named ‘LaserIP-GPK-2020’, designed to provide assistance in making reasoned court decisions according to the rules of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in ordinary proceedings. With the help of this program, we demonstrate in the paper the complexity of the law enforcement process for a person and the assistance that software can provide to overcome this complexity. The paper shows the subject area of the information system created by us, outlines the ways of further enhancement of software intended to facilitate law enforcement, and challenges the myths about the robot judge. Purpose: to determine the possible types of software to be developed in accordance with the types of law enforcement operations, provided that the discretion function remains with law enforcement officers; to determine the directions of the formalization of law enforcement operations and the possibilities of gradual transfer of some of them to artificial intelligence. Methods: the universal dialectical-materialistic method, employed when converting the law enforcement process into the language of information technology; analysis and synthesis of the law enforcement process, the formal-legal method – for converting the requirements of law and legal science to law enforcement into software commands for the judge and the parties to the case; the object-oriented approach to modeling; the object-oriented programming methodology, a relational approach to database design. Results: the ‘Laser-IPGPK-2020’ computer program contains a sequence of law enforcement operations and rules for their execution, the multiplicity and complexity of which exceeds the capabilities of most law enforcement officers. This program is designed to prevent law enforcement errors resulting from the limited human capabilities with regard to retaining knowledge of the multitude of rules of law enforcement operations, and to obviate the expenditure of time required for each individual judge to solely produce a reasoned decision in a case. Conclusion: the selection and development of particular IT solutions to be applied in law enforcement practice when solving legal cases are determined by the analysis of the law enforcement process, which is the subject area of the program.


2018 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. 03016
Author(s):  
Ahmad Sudiro ◽  
Ahmad Redi ◽  
Ade Adhari ◽  
Mardiana Rachman

Unlicensed mining has been a worldwide issue, including several regions in Indonesia, such as Southeast Sulawesi Province and East Java. The issue that will be examined in this paper is the policies to overcome the unlicensed mining in Southeast Sulawesi Province and East Java. In order to answer the issue, the type of research is socio-legal, by using the primary data in the form of interview result and secondary data in the form of documents the data were obtained from field study and study of literature. The research result shows that the effort to overcome the unlicensed mining by the Government of Southeast Sulawesi Province and East Java are different. The Government of Southeast Sulawesi Province applies the alternative policies such as the unlicensed mining control, aside from the law enforcement policy conducted by the police, prosecutor, and court. This differs from the Government of East Java which views that the law enforcement policy as the only means to overcome unlicensed mining. Unlicensed mining control conducted in Southeast Sulawesi could be an alternative policy since it delivers benefit such as the gaining of valid data of the unlicensed mining location, increasing the community awareness, as the instrument to protect the environment and so forth.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 138-155
Author(s):  
Dewi Arnita Sari

This journal aims to find about Ownership disputes land rights Related to land registration in Makassar city. The purpose of this study is : 1. to analyze the factors affecting the dispute over ownership of land that has been registered in Makassar. 2. to analyze how far the solutions are provided by the government in resolving ownership of land that has been registered.This research is descriptive research with empirical juridical approach method. Research method used is method by using primary and secondary data with data collecting technique that are interview and questionnaire. The population of this study are the employee office of the state land agency Makassar and public figure. Sample in this research is 30 respondents by using technique purposive sampling.The results of this study shownthat : (1). the factors affecting the dispute over ownership of land are Legal factors, law enforcement factors, facilities and infrastructure factors. (2). There are two solutions are provided by the government in resolving ownership of land, that was The national land agency facilitates to do mediation and Solutions through the judiciary, negotiations, and others Depending on the perpetrators leading in the direction of a good solution to them. Recommendation of this research is Government is expectedPlay an active role So that people did not have problems in dispute signs in the future, that is Increased administration to be more thorough in making land certificates In order to minimize the dispute. Developing the training in order to increase human resource of law enforcer, socialization to public can be held in great quantities and all of reinforced facility supplying so that all of factor whom can influence presence of proprietary right dispute for estate can be minimalized.Keyword : Ownership disputes land rights, land registration


2021 ◽  
pp. 1085
Author(s):  
Marian Marian ◽  
Stella Stella ◽  
Tatang Ruchimat

It has been almost two years since the COVID-19 pandemic devastated Indonesia. This, of course, forces the community and the government to face various problems and new polemics. However, the government did not just let go and always tried to overcome it so that the burden on the community during the Covid-19 pandemic could be lighter. This article was created to know the law enforcement carried out by the government by following applicable laws and regulations in overcoming the problem of hoarding Covid-19 therapeutic drugs and to examine the factors that influence the law enforcement process against the criminal act of hoarding Covid-19 therapeutic drugs. The research methodology used is normative legal research, centered on the use of library materials as a source of information. This research uses a qualitative approach by combining data and collective information from various sources which is then developed from a sociological point of view. The perpetrators of hoarding Covid-19 therapeutic drugs can be charged with several articles of criminal law as regulated in-laws and regulations, including Law No. 7 of 2014, Law No. 36 of 2009, and so on, with a maximum prison sentence of 10 years. However, in practice, the law enforcement process is very dependent on several factors, such as legislation, law enforcement officers, the availability of facilities and facilities, as well as the community. The Covid-19 pandemic has put people in a state of panic and the need for medicines has increased drastically, so efforts are urgently needed to deter hoarders and hope that similar incidents will not happen again. Law enforcers need to make legal breakthroughs in cracking down on drug hoarders, and also make other efforts such as revocation of permits, fines, and confiscation of stockpiled drugs to be subsequently given to people in need, also need to consider the characteristics of one case with another by following scale of stockpiling and types of drugs.Hampir dua tahun lamanya Pandemi Covid-19 telah memporakporandakan Indonesia. Hal itu tentu memaksa masyarakat dan juga pemerintah untuk menghadapi berbagai permasalahan hingga polemik baru. Namun pemerintah lantas tak lepas tangan begitu saja dan selalu berusaha untuk mengatasinya agar beban masyarakat di masa pandemi Covid-19 dapat lebih diringankan . Artikel ini dibuat dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui penegakan hukum yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku dalam mengatasi masalah penimbunan obat terapi Covid-19 serta menelaah faktor-faktor yang berpengaruh pada proses penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana penimbunan obat terapi Covid-19. Metodologi penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif, berpusat pada penggunaan bahan pustaka sebagai sumber informasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan mengkombinasikan data dan informasi kolektif dari berbagai sumber yang kemudian dikembangkan dengan sudut pandang sosiologis.  Pelaku penimbun obat terapi Covid-19 dapat dijerat dengan beberapa pasal hukum pidana sebagaimana diatur dalam peraturan perundang-undangan, antara lain UU No. 7 Tahun 2014, UU No.36 Tahun 2009,dan lain sebagainya, dengan ancaman hukuman penjara maksimal 10 tahun. Namun pada prakteknya proses penegakan hukum sangat bergantung pada beberapa faktor seperti peraturan perundang-undangan, aparat penegak hukum, ketersediaan sarana dan fasilitas serta  masyarakat. Pandemi Covid-19 telah membuat masyarakat berada dalam kepanikan dan kebutuhan obat-obatan pun meningkat drastis, sehingga sangat diperlukan daya upaya agar para penimbun menjadi jera dan kejadian serupa diharapkan tidak terulang kembali. Penegak hukum perlu melakukan terobosan hukum dalam menindak tegas penimbun obat, dan juga melakukan upaya lain seperti pencabutan izin, sanksi denda, dan penyitaan obat-obatan yang ditimbun untuk selanjutnya diberikan kepada masyarakat yang membutuhkan, juga perlu mempertimbangkan karakteristik kasus satu dengan yang lain sesuai dengan skala penimbunan dan jenis obat-obatannya. 


2020 ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Yuli Asmara Triputra ◽  
Derry Angling Kesuma ◽  
Silvana Oktanisa ◽  
Wasitoh Meirani

Abstrak Guru adalah pendidik profesional yang tugas dan perannya telah diatur dalam peraturan perundang-undangan. Negara selaku pemangku kewajiban dalam melindungi warga negara terkhusus guru, dituntut peran aktifnya dalam melindungi guru dari tindakan kriminalisasi akibat melaksanakan tugas profesionalnya. Pada tataran peraturan, pemerintah telah melakukan tindakan aktif berupa pengundangan beberapa peraturan terkait tugas dan peran guru. Namun dalam taraf penegakan hukum, masih sering ditemui guru yang berhadapan dengan hukum akibat laporan dari orang tua murid atas tindakan guru yang mendisiplinkan murid. Mahkamah Agung selaku judex juris, melalui Putusan Nomor : 1554K/ Pid/ 2013 telah memvonis bebas guru di Majalengka yang bernama Aop Saopudin selaku terdakwa karena Mahkamah Agung menganggap apa yang dilakukannya sudah menjadi tugasnya dan bukan bukan merupakan suatu tindak pidana dan terdakwa tidak dapat dijatuhi pidana atas perbuatan/tindakannya tersebut karena bertujuan untuk mendidik agar menjadi murid yang baik dan berdisiplin. Putusan Mahkamah Agung merupakan wujud tanggungjawab negara melalui lembaga kekuasaan kehakiman memberikan perlindungan terhadap guru dalam melaksanakan tugas profesionalnya. Kata Kunci : Tanggungjawab negara, Perlindungan, Guru. Abstract Teachers are professional educators whose duties and roles have been regulated in the legislation. The state as a stakeholder in protecting citizens, especially teachers, is required to play an active role in protecting teachers from criminalization due to carrying out their professional duties. At the regulatory level, the government has taken active action in the form of the invite of several regulations related to the duties and roles of teachers. However, in law enforcement level, there are still often teachers who face the law due to reports from parents of students for the actions of teachers who discipline students. The Supreme Court as judex juris, through The Verdict Number: 1554K / Pid / 2013 has sentenced a free teacher in Majalengka named Aop Saopudin as a defendant because the Supreme Court considers what he did has become his duty and not a criminal act and the defendant can not be sentenced for his actions because it aims to educate to be a good student and disciplined. The Supreme Court's decision is a manifestation of the state's responsibility through the institution of judicial power to provide protection to teachers in carrying out their professional duties.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 517
Author(s):  
Jeremy Emmanuel Purba

The Supreme Court’s decision in the case of an agreement between investors who enter into an agreement using English is contrary to the agreement of the parties. Changes to the agreement may be detrimental to investors in Indonesia, who must amend the agreement previously made in English. The research method based on the data needed in this research is secondary data obtained through literature study in the form of laws and descriptive analysis, namely analyzing the laws and regulations. The loan agreement between PT. BKP and Nine AM, Ltd. should not be null and void. The judge’s interpretation of a lawful cause is wrong because a lawful cause refers the contents of the loan agreement. The government should be firm in determining a sanction if there is a violation of the law. This is intended so that judges are not wrong in applying regulations so that they do not produce decisions that can harmcertain parties.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 339-360
Author(s):  
Muh. Afif Mahfud ◽  
Erlyn Indarti ◽  
Sukirno Sukirno

Penelitian ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan pengaruh ajaran Islam dan pemisahan kekuasaan pada perumusan prinsip bone montete inda posala-sala. Penegakan hukum di Kesultanan Buton didasarkan pada prinsip kesetaraan di hadapan hukum yang disebut bone montete inda posala-sala. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatan historis serta menggu-nakan data sekunder, yaitu bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa asas bone montete yinda posala-sala pada Kesultanan Buton dipengaruhi oleh ajaran Islam. Ini tampak dari ilmu tasawuf yang mendasari perumusan asas tersebut. Pemisahan kekuasaan di Kerajaan Buton turut mendukung implementasi asas bone montete yinda posala-sala. Fungsi peradilan yang dilaksanakan oleh sultan sebagai lembaga eksekutif diawasi Siolimbona sebagai lembaga legislatif. Direkomendasikan bahwa pemerintah mengadopsi nilai-nilai lokal dalam perumusan asas kesetaraan di hadapan hukum dan intensif mengkaji nilai-nilai lokal yang dapat berkontribusi dalam pengembangan hukum nasional. Bone Montete Inda Posala-Sala: Equality Before the Law in Buton Sultanate This research aims to describe the influence of Islamic teachings and the separation of powers in formulating the principle of “bone montete inda posala-sala”. Law enforcement in Butonese Sultanate is based on the equality before the law principle named “bone montete inda posala-sala”. This research apply normative juridical method by using conceptual and historical research based on secondary data namely primary and secondary legal materials. The results indicates that the principle of bone montete yinda posala-sala is influenced by Islamic teachings. This can be seen from the sufism that underlies the formulation of the principle. The separation of powers also supported the implementation of the principle. Judicial function under Sultan as an excecutive is supervised by Siolimbona as an legislative agency. It is recommended that the government should adopts local wisdoms in the formulation of the principle and intensively studies local values that can contribute to the development of national law.


2021 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
Anton Hendrik Samudra

This paper identifies hoax as a cyberspace social problem which can have a negative impact toward public order, both in cyberspace and real life. It also elaborates how a hoax is different from fake news for its characteristic. A hoax could cause horizontal conflict, especially in Indonesia when it is about the most recent common political commodities, which are race, ethnicity, religion, intergroup (SARA). Every government has interest on maintaining public order to keep the sustainability of society. Criminal law is designed to be the ultimate tool of social engineering through deterrence effect. The problem is how far the law enforcement is going to go to eradicate the hoax spreading, because the issues of freedom of speech/information.The research is conducted by using a conceptual approach in a normative legal study. Secondary data also provided in this paper to grasp the factual problems as the threat that needed to be encountered. The first part of the paper elaborates the freedom of speech/information, cyberspace, and social media. The second part is explanation of profile of hoax in Indonesia. The third part is elaboration of criminal statutes of hoax distribution using information communication technology. The last part is on how far the government and law enforcement synergize and how far they going to go in handling hoaxes and the sources to prevent and contain further damage. The findings are the blocking and taking down is not just about depraving internet user’s rights, but balancing between the freedom and public order. In order to be justifiable and balanced, the government needs to consider objectively whether the content was a threat that disrupting public order (moreover, national security), while the law enforcement could confiscate the electronic system involved and it should have been through appropriate criminal procedure.


Liquidity ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-166
Author(s):  
Muchtar Riva’i

The law arrangement of franchise law was first explicitly regulated by the Government Regulation No. 16 of 1997 which is then updated by Government Regulation No. 42 of 2007 to be created in an agreement that at least contains clauses as stipulated by Article 5 of the Government Regulation. However, franchise arrangements also associated with a variety of other laws and regulations applicable in Indonesia. This article is going to state that the importance of partnerships with small and medium enterprises as an effort to encourage the involvement of the wider economic community.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masdar Masdar

Cash waqf in Indonesia has been long enough implemented based on some rules enacted by government and other rules defined by The Waqf Board of Indonesia (BWI). However, the implementation of cash waqf has not reached the level of success. Therefore, this article studies the application of cash waqf law in Indonesia according to Friedman’s legal system theory. The legal system theory of Friedman firstly looks at the substance of the law, which is the rules or regulations; and secondly it examines the structure of the law, encompassing the law enforcement agencies, such as judge, prosecutor, police and legal counselors. And lastly the theory examines the element of legal culture, which is a response from Muslim society. The first two examinations indicate that there is nothing to be a problem. But from the last examination there is a problem regarding the trust from Muslim society. From the legal culture point of view, the implementation of cash waqf by the government, which is performed by BWI, needs attracting society’s credentials in order to improve and maximize the performance of cash waqf in Indonesia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document