scholarly journals SUMBANGSIH HASIL PENELITIAN DAN PENGEMBANGAN UNTUK INDONESIA LEBIH BAIK

2019 ◽  
pp. 2
Author(s):  
Sabungan Sibarani
Keyword(s):  
Research And Development ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Research Performance ◽  
Scientific Journals ◽  
Sources Of Information ◽  
Scientific Publications ◽  
High Productivity ◽  
Research Activities ◽  
Scientific Papers ◽  
Conducting Research

<p><em>One form of evaluation that can be done to determine the contribution of an institution in conducting research activities is to measure the productivity of researchers through scientific publications. Publication productivity or also called research output or research productivity is one indicator of research performance or research performance. A researcher is said to have high productivity if many researchers produce scientific papers and are published in scientific journals. Contribution of research and development results is also intended for a better Indonesia. And without fail, it is also important to have input in making policies for publication of publications, as well as research planning, including providing the latest sources of information in research and development.</em><em></em></p>

scholarly journals Bibliometric analysis of adverse drug reactions and pharmacovigilance research activities in Nepal

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 204209862092248
Author(s):  
Sunil Shrestha ◽  
Krisha Danekhu ◽  
Bhuvan KC ◽  
Subish Palaian ◽  
Mohamed Izham Mohamed Ibrahim
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Adverse Drug Reactions ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Research Performance ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Original Research ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Drug Induced ◽  
Scientific Publications ◽  
Research Activities

Background: Bibliometric analyses have been used previously to study the measures of quality and impact of research performed in several health-related areas such as adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and pharmacovigilance (PV), etc. This method can assess the research performance of publications quantitatively and statistically. There is no evidence of bibilometric studies analyzing ADRs and PV from Nepal. Therefore, the present study aimed to assess scientific output on ADRs and PV-related research activities in Nepal using a bibliometric analysis of publications from 2004 January to December 2018, that is, 15 years. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Scopus and Nepal Journal Online (NepJOL) databases. ‘Adverse Drug Reactions‘ or ‘ADRs‘ or ‘ADR‘ or ‘Adverse drug reaction‘ or ‘AE‘ or ‘Adverse Event‘ or ‘Drug-Induced Reaction‘ or ‘Pharmacovigilance‘ or ‘PV‘ and ‘Nepal‘. The search covered 15 years (January 2004 to December 2018) of study on ADRs and PV in Nepal. Only articles retrieved from databases were included, whereas published/unpublished drug bulletins, pharmacy newsletters and thesis were excluded. The articles thus retrieved were recorded, and thereafter analyzed. Word count code was used for the analysis of keywords used in the retrieved articles. Results: A total of 124 articles were retrieved, with the highest rate of publications in 2006 and 2007, with 16 papers each. Among the articles, 10 (8.1%) were published in Kathmandu University Medical Journal (KUMJ). Single papers were published in 38 different journals. Brief reports (1.6%), case reports (31.2%), case series (0.8%), education forums (0.8%), letters to the editor (5.6%), original research articles (41.9%), review articles (9.7%), short communications and short reports (8.1%) on ADRs and PV were recorded. Out of 124 papers, 52 (41.9%) were original research publications. The majority (74.1%) of research was done in the category of ADR incidence, types, prevention, and management, followed by policy and suggestions for strengthening national and regional pharmacovigilance centers of Nepal (14.5%). Conclusions: During the study years, there was an increase in scientific publications on drug safety. A total of 124 published articles were found during bibliometric analysis of ADRs and PV research activities in Nepal.

Research by Regional Psychiatrists, 1978–84

1986 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 471-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon Parker
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Scientific Journal ◽  
Research Quality ◽  
Scientific Publications ◽  
High Productivity ◽  
High Citation ◽  
Published Research ◽  
Publishing Journal

An audit was undertaken of research by psychiatrists in Australia and New Zealand published in an accepted scientific journal during the seven-year period, 1978-84. The key analyses were limited to first authors only and identified 89 responsible for 372 scientific publications. Despite an increase in psychiatrists in the region there was no evidence of any increased research output during the seven years. While the distribution of researchers across the region was consistent with the overall distribution of psychiatrists, relatively strong and consistent differences in measures of quality and quantity of research output were demonstrated between geographical areas. The audit examined published research by topic, by publishing journal, and by the affiliation of the researcher. Several measures of research quality and productivity were internally and externally validated. Profiles are given of the average researcher and of those distinguished in terms of high productivity and high citation rates.

scholarly journals Research and Development Indicators of EU28 Countries from Viewpoint of Super‑efficiency DEA Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 225-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beáta Gavurová ◽  
Martina Halásková ◽  
Samuel Koróny
Keyword(s):  
Research And Development ◽  
High Tech ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Scientific Publications ◽  
Total Employment ◽  
Super Efficiency ◽  
Development Indicators ◽  
Research Activities ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Significant Difference

Research and development are important sources of economic growth and social welfare and play a key role in creating new knowledge, products and technological processes. In our paper we focused on the analysis and evaluation of research and innovation potential in the European Union countries in 2010 and 2015 using Data Envelopment Analysis. For the evaluation, seven indicators were selected, as starting point for the evaluation of research activities and the measurement of the innovation performance and of competitiveness of the individual countries. Input capital indicators were – R&D expenditure in the higher education sector and in the business enterprise sector as % of GDP. Input human labour indicators were total researchers (FTE), human resources in science and technology (HRST) as % of active population and employment in total service intensive sectors as % of total employment. Output indicators were the number of scientific publications and high‑tech export as % of total export. On basis of DEA super‑efficiency analyses results we can make following conclusions. The best group of five countries is characterized by efficient status in both analysed periods 2010 and 2015 (Bulgaria, Romania, Cyprus, Croatia and United Kingdom). The second group contains two countries Germany and Italy. This countries improved status from inefficient in 2010 to efficient in 2015. In the third group are five countries that worsened their status from efficient in 2010 to inefficient one in 2015: Portugal, Malta, Poland, Luxembourg and Netherlands. In last fourth group are all other EU28 countries that were inefficient in both analysed periods 2010 and 2015. In group of V4 countries situation is not optimistic. Poland worsened its status from efficient in 2010 to inefficient one in 2015 and three remaining countries – Hungary, Czech Republic and Slovakia stagnated in inefficient status in both periods. On the opposite there was not significant difference in super‑efficiencies in 2010 and in 2015 and in their differences between capitalist and post‑socialist EU28 countries.

scholarly journals Pustakawan akademik sebagai mitra riset di perguruan tinggi

Al Maktabah ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulpah Andayani
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Information Literacy ◽  
Research Program ◽  
Education Program ◽  
Academic Librarians ◽  
Sources Of Information ◽  
Research Activities ◽  
Information Research ◽  
Conducting Research

This paper deals with the role of academic librarians in higher education program. The focus ofthe study is to explain the roles of academic librarians as research partner in the higher educationprograms. Based on the analysis of the literatures, it was found that academic librarians have astrategic role in successing the research program. There are three main roles of academic librariansin the research activities, that are providing information research services, conducting research skillstraining, and assisting academic members in publishing and disseminating the research findings.Furthermore, the Librarians serve and assist the researchers individually in performing the researchactivities, as well as arrange and implement programs in groups or classes program in teachingresearch skills through information literacy program. Through the teaching of information literacy,the academicians are provided the ability to identify the sources of information, the ability to searchinformation, and the ability to manage the citations.

Knowledge Transfer Offices in the Context of Knowledge Spillover Theory of Entrepreneurship

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 7-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergej Lugović ◽  
Frane Šesnić ◽  
Miran Sladić
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Transfer ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Knowledge Spillover ◽  
Sources Of Information ◽  
Related Information ◽  
Spillover Theory ◽  
Scientific Papers ◽  
Knowledge Spillover Theory ◽  
Conducting Research ◽  
The Eu

Paper will present aspects of the knowledge transfer offices (KTO) from the EU Knowledge Transfer Study report through the prism of the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship (KSTE). It will also add the argument, based on the existing literature that in fact, knowledge couldn’t be managed but only the information resources can. This paper contributes to the on-going research Secondary Experience which main aim is to explore avenues for designing an information system that will support better use of the existing scientific papers between universities and their environment, including public, private and civil sector. There is a limited number of the EU wide research on the EU universities Knowledge transfer offices but existing one is sending not very promising results. In the last EU, a report addressing KTO not even one hypothesis addressing KTO related policies is accepted, and one of the hardest parts in conducting research was to find the contacts of the KTO’s. It is aligned with results from the master thesis of one of the authors where sources of information were analysed in terms of the transparency of the projects and their funding related information among 466 universities in the Danube region. That alerted us and opened up a completely new set of questions. In this paper, we use secondary data as content for our research.

scholarly journals Pelatihan Kegiatan Penelitian dan Penulisan Karya Ilmiah bagi Guru Madrasah Aliyah Negeri 3 Lombok Tengah

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 28
Author(s):  
Muhali Muhali ◽  
Muhammad Asy’ari ◽  
Saiful Prayogi ◽  
Taufik Samsuri ◽  
I Wayan Karmana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Action Research ◽  
Community Service ◽  
Scientific Writing ◽  
Scientific Article ◽  
Scientific Journals ◽  
Research Activities ◽  
Writing Research ◽  
Service Training ◽  
Classroom Action Research ◽  
Conducting Research

Training on Research Activities and Scientific Writing for Madrasah Aliyah Negeri 3 Lombok Tengah Teachers The purpose of this community service was to improve the ability of teachers to conduct research and publish a research article in a national scientific journal. This program was implemented through a series of activities using in-service training (IST) and on-service training (OST) methods. The andragogy approach was used in IST activities to improve the ability of teachers in analyzing the learning problems that can be raised as research problems; to convey the concept of research in general, especially classroom action research; and to write a scientific article. OST activities are intended to assist the teachers in conducting research activities, writing research reports and scientific articles and publishing scientific journals. The results of IST activities illustrated the situation of Madrasah Aliyah Negeri 3 Lombok Tengah teachers that most teachers had been able to analyze problems that can be raised as the main problems in research activities; the teacher had a good understanding of the concept of classroom action research, design, instruments, and analysis of research data; the teacher was able to understand the concepts and techniques of writing research reports and scientific articles; and the teacher had been able to understand the concepts and techniques of publishing articles in national scientific journals. OST results indicated that teachers had the potential to develop themselves in conducting research and producing scientific papers. During the implementation of community service activities, the teacher consistently followed the activities well. The resulting scientific work could be categorized as good, and generally, met the criteria of scientific writing.    

scholarly journals Dirección de tesis doctorales como reflejo de la Biblioteconomía y Documentación académica española: actores y temas

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregorio González-Alcaide ◽  
Aurora González-Teruel
Keyword(s):  
Information Science ◽  
Average Rate ◽  
Subject Area ◽  
Scientific Journals ◽  
High Concentration ◽  
Scientific Publications ◽  
Research Activities ◽  
Las Mujeres ◽  
Doctoral Dissertations ◽  
The University

Doctoral dissertations enable the transfer of research skills and capacities to future generations and the consolidation of lines of research in a given area of knowledge. The field of Library and Information Science in public universities in Spain is characterized by the supervision of doctoral theses by academics in the area. We identified active professors during the 2019–2020 academic year, their date of appointment as civil servants within the public university system, the dissertations that they supervised, and their participation in papers published in scientific journals. The analysis included 644 theses. About a quarter (23%) of university faculty have never supervised a doctoral thesis, and most faculty members and tenured professors (60%) show a lower than average rate of adviserships per year since their academic appointment. There is a high concentration of PhD advisers in just a few institutions and academics (8% of university professors have supervised 42% of the dissertations), with an important gender imbalance: women supervised an average of 1.8 dissertations, compared with 2.6 for men. Information units and services, study metrics and scientific publications, and information sources are the topics of 47% of the dissertations. Many of the professors with 10 or more adviserships (n/N = 12/18) lack a subject area specialization, and their role in PhD supervision was not related to their participation in research activities oriented toward publishing in scientific journals. Our results suggest that considering supervision of doctoral theses as an important academic merit could contribute to a further concentration of power and social capital among a small group of advisers. This phenomenon could reduce the plurality of topics addressed and favor suboptimal adviserships. The imbalances described emerge as another threat, exacerbating the epistemological crisis in the discipline and in the university studies in this area of knowledge. Resumen Las tesis doctorales posibilitan la transmisión de la capacidad investigadora a las futuras generaciones y la consolidación de las líneas de investigación de un área de conocimiento. Se caracteriza la Biblioteconomía y Documentación de las universidades públicas españolas a partir de la dirección de tesis doctorales por los académicos del área. Se han identificado los docentes activos en el curso 2019-2020, su fecha de nombramiento como funcionarios, las tesis que han dirigido y su participación en publicaciones en revistas científicas. Se han analizado 644 tesis. Un 23% de los titulares de universidad nunca ha participado en la dirección de tesis y la mayoría de los titulares y catedráticos de universidad (60%) tienen un promedio de direcciones/año desde su nombramiento por debajo de la media del área. Existe una elevada concentración en unas pocas instituciones y directores (el 8% del profesorado ha dirigido el 42% de las tesis), con importantes desequilibrios en la participación de las mujeres (promedio de 1,8 tesis dirigidas frente a 2,6 en el caso de los hombres). Unidades y servicios de información, estudios métricos de la publicación científica y fuentes de información son los temas del 47% de las tesis. Muchos de los docentes con 10 o más direcciones (n=18) adolecen de una especialización temática, no existiendo una relación entre su relevante papel en las tareas de dirección y su participación en las actividades de investigación a través de publicaciones en revistas científicas. Los resultados alertan acerca de que la consideración de la dirección de tesis como un importante mérito curricular puede contribuir a reforzar el fenómeno de la concentración del poder y capital social en un reducido grupo de directores, provocando una reducción de la pluralidad de enfoques y direcciones menos eficientes. Los desequilibrios descritos se erigen como una amenaza más que se suma a la crisis epistemológica y de los estudios universitarios de esta área de conocimiento.

scholarly journals Professor, does your university (want to) know what you are doing?

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bård Smedsrød ◽  
Leif Longva
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Scholarly Publishing ◽  
Scientific Journals ◽  
Scientific Publications ◽  
Scientific Staff ◽  
Major Interest ◽  
Scientific Papers ◽  
Editorial Work ◽  
Publishing Houses ◽  
The University

To make sure that resources are used optimally in maximizing the production of graduates (bachelors, masters and PhDs) and research (scientific publications in various channels), universities are constantly intensifying and improving their ways of recording and counting the achievements of their scientific staff. Teaching hours and scientific papers are meticulously monitored, and administrative staff is increasingly occupied making sure that this registration results in a true and just picture of the way human resources are being spent, and reveal how the production system may become more effective.However, in addition to research and teaching, there are some rather important work tasks that we all agree are very important, but nevertheless goes under the radar of the university counting regimes: Reviewing tasks. The scientists at the university spend time (frequently a lot of time) doing reviewing work for free for scientific journals. Our scientists also spend a lot of time working as reviewers for national and international funding bodies and in a great number of committees to evaluate the quality of job applicants. And they serve as quality referees in advanced exams such as master and PhD dissertations. Most of these tasks are pivotal to the scientific society and the society in general, yet not realized by the university. The truth is that many of these tasks, which can only be carried out by merited scientists, exist only in a kind of shadow land at the universities.A recent survey presented in a master thesis at the University of Tromsø documented that 15-20.000 hours per year is spent by UoT scientists to work for free for scientifical journals (Maria Refsdal (2010): “Peer review at the University of Tromsø : a study of time spent on reviewing and researchers’ opinions on peer review”). Does the university take any interest in the fact that as much as 20.000 hours paid for by tax payers money is given away for free to the scientific journals who would not survive if it weren't for this work? The answer appears to be “no”.We believe that a key for academic institutions to regain control over the scholarly publishing regime and force it to change into an all true open access system, is to make sure that they take a major interest in the reviewing tasks carried out by scientists.Recently researchers across the world have started a boycott of the publisher Elsevier, and declaring they do not wish to publish in Elsevier’s journals, nor do any refereeing or editorial work for these journals (http://thecostofknowledge.com/). The boycot came about as a protest against the high subscription prices. An interesting question is: Does the University have any view on researchers’ boycotts like this?We claim that universities as employers and managers of public research funding, by taking interest in what their employees do and not do, the university may have a forceful tool to lead the publishing houses in directions as desired by the university and the society.Would a closer control of the reviewing tasks of scientists jeopardize what we regard as free academic activity? To some extent it probably would. Is that what it takes for academia to regain control of the activity of scholarly publishing? We believe that the reviewing process represents the most powerful weapon to make the publishing houses understand that they are here to serve the academics and the society, not the other way round.

Research & development and regional smart specialisation: do they matter for productivity?

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Peter Pisár ◽  
Jan Huňady ◽  
Ina Ďurčeková
Keyword(s):  
Research And Development ◽  
Labour Productivity ◽  
Scientific Publications ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
The Czech Republic ◽  
Research Activities ◽  
Smart Specialisation ◽  
Potential Link ◽  
Smart Specialization ◽  
The Eu

Abstract Research and development activities within the region are often seen as a key driving force of innovation performance. This is further important for productivity growth and economic growth of the region. These issues are part of European Union strategy for regional development called Smart Specialization. Higher education institutions play important role in the support of innovation in the region via their own research activities, knowledge creation and dissemination and improvement of the human capital in the region. The main aim of our research is to test potential link between intensity of research & development as well as specialization of the region and labour productivity in the region. In our research we compared NUTS 2 regions in the Czech Republic and Slovakia based on the selected indicators related to research and development. We used factor analysis and regression analysis based on the cross-sectional data for all NUTS 2 regions in the EU. Our results strongly suggest that focus on research & development activities is positively correlated with higher labour productivity in the region. Higher number of scientific publications and patents is also positively linked to higher productivity in the region. The same seems to be true for higher share of tertiary educated inhabitants.

scholarly journals THE MODEL OF MOTIVATING THE HIGHER EDUCATION FACULTIES OF UKRAINE BY EMPLOYING IT IN KNOWLEDGE SHARING TO IMPROVE ACADEMIC PUBLICATIONS

2021 ◽  
pp. 5-9
Author(s):  
O. Burdiuh
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Research And Development ◽  
Information Exchange ◽  
Knowledge Exchange ◽  
Teaching Staff ◽  
Scientific Publications ◽  
Academic Knowledge ◽  
Research And Teaching ◽  
Research Activities ◽  
The Impact

Research and development are central to national and civilizational achievements. Research and development in any country is measured by the results of research, such as scientific publications. Scientific publications become the main criterion for evaluating teachers, as well as research and teaching staff of higher education institutions and research institutions. Knowledge is the most important resource in universities. Useful knowledge can improve the performance of employees in the organization. The exchange of knowledge or information exchange between employees is important for scientists and practitioners. Acquisition of knowledge, exchange of knowledge and use of knowledge are three types of knowledge management. Higher education in Ukraine seeks to strengthen research as a key component of the development of the nation and its universities. In recent years, higher education in Ukraine has initiated many projects to improve research on the productivity of research and teaching staff in Ukrainian universities. Ukrainian higher education seeks to automate all research activities to increase the effectiveness of research. This article discusses the impact of knowledge use. Joint use to improve the scientific publications of scientists and teachers of Ukrainian universities. In addition, this study identifies factors that lead to an increase in the level of knowledge exchange in Ukrainian universities. The author conducted an online interview with 350 representatives of the scientific and pedagogical staff of the Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, studied scientific articles and websites of academic institutions to determine important indicators for measuring the productivity of scientific research. The results show that computer- mediated communication and the nature of knowledge are the main factors that positively affect the exchange of knowledge in Ukrainian universities. The author also concluded that scientific publications are a key indicator for measuring research performance. In addition, the exchange of academic knowledge and indirect communication significantly increases the productivity of research in Ukrainian universities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document