Analysis of Geographical Distribution of Referrals to Psychiatry From Primary Care

Effective policy mechanisms for an equitable geographical distribution of general practitioners: a qualitative comparative analysis of the accessibility of primary care in Europe

Journal of Health Services Research & Policy ◽

10.1177/1355819613482885 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 18 (3) ◽

pp. 151-159 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Susanne Ozegowski

Keyword(s):

Primary Care ◽

Comparative Analysis ◽

Geographical Distribution ◽

General Practitioners ◽

Qualitative Comparative Analysis ◽

Effective Policy ◽

Policy Mechanisms

Download Full-text

Geographical distribution of primary care clinics for elderly ambulatory diabetic patients in Ibaraki Prefecture

An Official Journal of the Japan Primary Care Association ◽

10.14442/generalist.38.127 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 38 (2) ◽

pp. 127-130

Author(s):

Takashi Nakamura ◽

Masanobu Okayama ◽

Masakazu Aihara ◽

Takao Kojo ◽

Shizukiyo Ishikawa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Primary Care ◽

Geographical Distribution ◽

Diabetic Patients ◽

Primary Care Clinics ◽

Ibaraki Prefecture

Download Full-text

Analysis of geographical distribution of referrals to psychiatry from primary care

European Psychiatry ◽

10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.858 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 41 (S1) ◽

pp. S576-S576

Author(s):

B. Mata Saenz ◽

V. Muñoz Martinez ◽

L. Nuevo Fernández ◽

E. Lopez Lavela ◽

L.M. Asensio Aguerri

Keyword(s):

Mental Health ◽

Primary Care ◽

Prospective Study ◽

Geographical Distribution ◽

Significant Relationship ◽

Geographical Origin ◽

Demographic Data ◽

Place Of Residence ◽

Area 5 ◽

Competing Interest

IntroductionThe distribution of the demand from primary care in the mental health units could be a way of facilitating the coordination and improving the attention to patients. For this reason, in our unit we have made a repartition of the areas among the different psychiatrists.ObjectivesTo analyze if there was a correlation between the geographical origin of the patients or their primary care areas and the referrals, and between them and their attendance.MethodsThis is an epidemiological, analytic, prospective study of patients referred to our department. The following variables were collected: (1) referral protocol, (2) reason, (3) demographic data (origin, gender, age), (4) Primary Care area, (5) attendance to appointment, (6) diagnosis impression and (7) destination of referral. The SPSS 19.0 was used to analyze the data.ResultsA total of 1048 patients were sampled. A statistically significant relationship hasn’t been found between place of residence, primary care area or areas of distribution in the Unit and attendance (Chi2). If we analyze the population of each distribution, we can describe similar percentages depending on the size of these.ConclusionsAlthough a different distribution and a relationship is thought between some areas and the attendance or the number of referrals, we didn’t find out them in our sample.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Download Full-text

Fool’s Gold: Psychologists Using Disingenuous Reasoning to Mislead Legislatures into Granting Psychologists Prescriptive Authority

American Journal of Law & Medicine ◽

10.1017/s0098858800002586 ◽

2003 ◽

Vol 29 (4) ◽

pp. 489-524

Author(s):

Brent Pollitt

Keyword(s):

Primary Care ◽

Mental Illness ◽

Nurse Practitioners ◽

Primary Care Physicians ◽

American Psychological Association ◽

The United States ◽

Psychotropic Medications ◽

American Psychological ◽

Training Requirements ◽

Prescriptive Authority

Mental illness is a serious problem in the United States. Based on “current epidemiological estimates, at least one in five people has a diagnosable mental disorder during the course of a year.” Fortunately, many of these disorders respond positively to psychotropic medications. While psychiatrists write some of the prescriptions for psychotropic medications, primary care physicians write more of them. State legislatures, seeking to expand patient access to pharmacological treatment, granted physician assistants and nurse practitioners prescriptive authority for psychotropic medications. Over the past decade other groups have gained some form of prescriptive authority. Currently, psychologists comprise the primary group seeking prescriptive authority for psychotropic medications.The American Society for the Advancement of Pharmacotherapy (“ASAP”), a division of the American Psychological Association (“APA”), spearheads the drive for psychologists to gain prescriptive authority. The American Psychological Association offers five main reasons why legislatures should grant psychologists this privilege: 1) psychologists’ education and clinical training better qualify them to diagnose and treat mental illness in comparison with primary care physicians; 2) the Department of Defense Psychopharmacology Demonstration Project (“PDP”) demonstrated non-physician psychologists can prescribe psychotropic medications safely; 3) the recommended post-doctoral training requirements adequately prepare psychologists to prescribe safely psychotropic medications; 4) this privilege will increase availability of mental healthcare services, especially in rural areas; and 5) this privilege will result in an overall reduction in medical expenses, because patients will visit only one healthcare provider instead of two–one for psychotherapy and one for medication.

Download Full-text