scholarly journals Uneven spatial development of municipalities in the Far Eastern borderland

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-77
Author(s):  
V. V. Lazareva ◽  
N. Yu. Vlasova ◽  
V. N. Dyachenko
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 2256-2275
Author(s):  
V.N. D'yachenko ◽  
V.V. Lazareva

Subject. This article explores the changes in the region's rural settlement system driven by certain transformations in agriculture. Objectives. The article aims to assess the impact of the transformations in agricultural production of the Amur Oblast on the settlement structure of the Far Eastern agricultural region. Methods. For the study, we used the methods of logical, comparative, and statistical analyses, and typology. A set of spatial development theories is the methodological basis of the study. Results. The article presents a database that helps understand the history of agricultural settlements of the area, as well as demographic processes and trends differentiation. Conclusions. The mechanisms to stabilize the area's population should be used alongside with spatial development policies that are in line with the development of agricultural settlements.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 56-71
Author(s):  
Boris Krasnopolski ◽  

The problems of studying the role of the main infrastructure as the most important «framework» in the formation of the spatial structure of the country are considered and the main regularities of its influence on the systemic efficiency of spatial formations are substantiated. The methods of regional research, the issues of systemic balance of spatial development, numerical methods for assessing the emergence of spatial systems, the problems of development of territories and water areas of the Far Eastern Arctic, etc. are analyzed


2021 ◽  
pp. 42-48
Author(s):  
Н.Р. ЗАНГЕЕВА ◽  
В.С. БАТОМУНКУЕВ ◽  
В.Г. АЮШЕЕВА

Российская урбанизация по своему содержанию и региональному развитию является крайне актуальным предметом научного анализа. В настоящее время большой интерес вызывают перспективы формирования и развития крупных городских агломераций в Азиатской России, в связи с чем возникают проблемы, обусловленные системой расселения, которая в своем пространственном аспекте является весьма неоднородной. В административно-территориальном делении Азиатская Россия включает в себя субъекты трех федеральных округов – Уральского, Сибирского и Дальневосточного. Регионы между собой отличаются по степени освоенности, по уровню социально-экономического развития и урбанизации. Основной зоной концентрации населения являются крупные города, ведущие транспортные узлы Транссибирской железнодорожной магистрали. При этом большая часть территорий азиатской части страны характеризуется слабой заселенностью. Это, как правило, периферийные районы, крайне отдаленные от основной транспортной оси, полностью или частично утратившие свою специализацию, которые на сегодняшний день не имеют устойчивых социально-экономических перспектив развития и интенсивно теряют свое население. Низкий уровень урбанизированности восточных регионов ставит под угрозу национальную безопасность страны. В связи с чем особого внимания заслуживает анализ процессов урбанизации азиатской части России с целью выявления современных особенностей трансформации пространственного развития. Для понимания макрорегиональной ситуации авторы основывались на обобщении результатов оценки уровня урбанизации, социально-экономического анализа крупных региональных центров азиатской части России и индекса человеческого развития. В рамках исследования выявлены основные факторы трансформации современного пространственного развития в регионе. Russian urbanization, in its content and regional development, is an extremely relevant subject of scientific analysis. Currently, the prospects of formation and development of large urban agglomerations in Asian Russia are of great interest, for which cause the problems arise due to the settlement system, which in its spatial aspect is very heterogeneous. The administrative-territorial division of Asiatic Russia includes subjects of three federal districts: Ural, Siberian and Far Eastern. The regions differ between themselves in the degree of development and the level of socio-economic development and urbanization. The main areas of population concentration are large cities, the leading transport hubs of the Trans-Siberian Railway. At the same time, most of the territories in the Asian part of the country are sparsely populated. As a rule, these are peripheral areas, extremely distant from the main transport axis, fully or partially lost their specialization and which today do not have sustainable socio-economic prospects for development and are intensively losing their population. The low level of urbanization of the eastern regions threatens the national security of the country. In this regard, the analysis of urbanization processes in the Asian part of Russia deserves special significance in order to identify modern features of transformation of spatial development. To understand the macro-regional situation, the authors were founded on the generalization of the estimation results of the level of urbanization, and socio-economic analysis of major regional centers of the Asian part of Russia and the human development index. The study identified the main factors in the transformation of modern spatial development in the region.


Author(s):  
Igor A. Seleznev ◽  
◽  
Nikolay Yu. Mikryukov ◽  
Timur R. Miriazov ◽  
◽  
...  

The article presents the results of a sociological study of the problems of regional spatial development of the regions of the Siberian Federal district (SFD). There are the materials of the survey of residents of four regions of the SFD are analyzed, the socio-demographic and socio-economic situation in Western and Eastern Siberia is compared, and the opinions and assessments of the population of the main socio-economic indicators of regional development are considered; General and special in the social self-feeling, demographic and migration situation, lifestyle of the population of Western and Eastern Siberia. The research was carried out under the project “Modeling scenarios of spatial development of Siberia and the Russian Far East until 2030: features of the settlement system”, which won the RFBR competition. The main goal is to assess the current state of the resettlement system, develop strategic prospects and model alternative scenarios for the spatial development of the regions of the Siberian and Far Eastern Federal Districts. Based on the author's development of an empirical research model, a survey of respondents living in four Siberian regions was conducted in August 2019. The results of the survey allowed us to identify differences in migration preferences, a number of features of the economic potential and quality of infrastructure and social sphere.


2020 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-233
Author(s):  
M. V. Fomin ◽  
V. A. Bezverbny ◽  
I. A. Seleznev ◽  
I. S. Shushpanova ◽  
E. A. Lukashenko ◽  
...  

The purpose of the article is to identify the features and problems of spatial development of the regions of the North of the Russian Far East. The research was carried out under the project “Modeling the spatial development scenarios of Siberia and the Far East of Russia until 2030: features of the resettlement system” (RFBR grant No. 19-010-00836 A), which won the RFBR competition “Fundamental Scientific Research Projects”. The study is being conducted by the team of the Department of Geourbanistics & Spatial Development of ISPR FCTAS RAS since 2019 and is intended to last for three years. The main goal is to assess the current state of the resettlement system, develop strategic prospects and model alternative scenarios for the spatial development of the regions of the Siberian and Far Eastern Federal Districts. A key feature is the use of interdisciplinary methods based on a combination of economic, mathematical, sociological, statistical and scenario approaches to research. From a practical point of view, the project results will help to plan more rationally the spatial development the spatial development of the country’s regions. The analysis shows that the sociological methods of spatial research have large reserves but are not yet used to the full capacity. This article discusses the current problems of spatial development of the north of the Russian Far East. On the basis of the authors’ development of the empirical research model by a group of scientists of ISPR FCTAS RAS, in August 2019, the survey of respondents of the Kamchatka Krai, the Magadan Oblast` and the Chukotka Autonomous Okrug was conducted. The results of the opinion poll made it possible to identify differences in migration preferences, a number of features of the economic potential capacity and the quality of infrastructure, and the social sphere of the Far Eastern regions of the country.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 71-78
Author(s):  
Anton Kireev ◽  

The article raises a number of scientific and practical problems, actualized by the widespread use of the «agglomeration» category in the text of «Spatial development strategy of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2025». The author presents his views on the place of agglomerations in the spatial structure of society, the difficulties of their interdisciplinary study, the methods for identifying agglomerations and describing their structure, the approaches to regulating agglomeration processes in Russia and its Far Eastern region. Attention is drawn to the risks associated with the high uncertainty of the consequences of strategic transformations of the Russian space


1975 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 981-981
Author(s):  
JOHN H. FLAVELL
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nora S. Newcombe ◽  
Frances Balcomb ◽  
Alexandra Twyman
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
pp. 53-58
Author(s):  
S. Afontsev ◽  
N. Zubarevich

The questions of spatial development as a modernization driver (the Kazakhstan case) are considered in this article. The analysis of the regional economic differences makes possible to work out the development guidelines, based on the advantages combination of the basic goods specialization and the policy of transferring growth impulses from the raw materials sector to the industry and service ones. Current challenges and opportunities, which face the Kazakhstan economy, the questions of economic diversification drive up the importance of the connection between spatial development and the cluster priorities. The analytical scheme of macro-regions and diversification through the dynamic focal networks can settle up these challenges.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document