Detection of hepatic steatosis using the controlled attenuation parameter: a comparative study with liver biopsy

2014 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 611-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusuf Yilmaz ◽  
Atakan Yesil ◽  
Fatma Gerin ◽  
Rabia Ergelen ◽  
Hakan Akin ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 62 (9) ◽  
pp. 2569-2577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor de Lédinghen ◽  
Jean-Baptiste Hiriart ◽  
Julien Vergniol ◽  
Wassil Merrouche ◽  
Pierre Bedossa ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (01) ◽  
pp. 36-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna Galaski ◽  
Lisa Schulz ◽  
Jenny Krause ◽  
Ansgar Lohse

Abstract Objective The controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) measured by transient elastography allows for the noninvasive assessment of hepatic steatosis. However, discrepant results between CAP values and histological evaluation have been reported in particular with high CAP values. We therefore investigated the diagnostic validity of high CAP measurements. Methods Forty patients with liver disease and CAP measurements > 300 dB/m that underwent ultrasound-guided or minilaparoscopic liver biopsy were retrospectively enrolled. CAP values were compared with the respective histological and macroscopic evaluation and correlated with clinical parameters. Results CAP values > 300 dB/m had an 87.5 % specificity for detection of hepatic steatosis but failed to discriminate between steatosis grade S1 – S3. Discordant results, defined as a discrepancy of at least 2 steatosis grades between transient elastography and liver biopsy, were observed in 40 % of cases. The interquartile range (IQR) of CAP was confirmed as a predictor of discrepant findings. Macroscopic evaluation as part of minilaparoscopy detected hepatic steatosis in 74 % of patients with histological grade S2 – S3 in contrast to only 10 % classified as histological grade S0 – S1. Conclusion High CAP measurements need to be interpreted with care and with regard to clinical parameters, in particular when high IQR values are registered.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. e0251487
Author(s):  
Dieter Broering ◽  
Mohamed Shawkat ◽  
Ali Albenmousa ◽  
Faisal Abaalkhail ◽  
Saleh Alabbad ◽  
...  

Introduction Hepatic steatosis (HS) negatively impacts transplant outcomes in living liver donors. To date, liver biopsy is preferred for HS evaluation. This study aims to evaluate the measurement of controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) as a diagnostic tool of HS in living liver donors. Methods Candidates recruited to this study, conducted from April 2016 to February 2020, were potential donors who had undergone transient elastography using Fibroscan® and CAP measurements at liver segments VI and VII, followed by liver biopsy. The HS grades from liver biopsy were classified as S0 (<5%), S1 (5–33%), S2 (33–66%), and S3 (>66%). For CAP, they were S0 (≤218dB/m), S1 (218-249dB/m)), S2 (250-305dB/m)), and S3 (>305dB/m)). The CAP measurements were compared with the liver biopsy results. Results Of the 150 potential donors [male, 73.3%; mean age, 30.0±7.0 years; body mass index (BMI), 24.7±3.5kg/m2], 92 (61.3%) had no or mild HS, while 58 (38.7%) and 10% had moderate to severe HS based on CAP and liver biopsy, respectively. Subjects with moderate to severe HS per CAP were mostly males (0.014), and had higher BMI (p = .006), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (.001), gamma-glutamyl transferase (.026), and high-density lipoprotein (.008). On multivariate analysis, high ALT (OR, 1.051; 95% CI, 1.016–1.087; p = .004) was a predictor of significant HS. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of CAP to detect significant HS were 93.3%, 67.4, 24.1%, and 98.9%, respectively. Conclusion The high sensitivity and negative predictive values of CAP make it a good screening test to exclude significant HS in potential living liver donors which, in turn, can help avoid unnecessary liver biopsies.


2016 ◽  
Vol 173 ◽  
pp. 160-164.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nirav K. Desai ◽  
Sarah Harney ◽  
Roshan Raza ◽  
Alyaa Al-Ibraheemi ◽  
Nick Shillingford ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (10) ◽  
pp. 3533-3538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y.H. Yen ◽  
F.Y. Kuo ◽  
C.C. Lin ◽  
C.L. Chen ◽  
K.C. Chang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document