Comparing the semantic networks of children with cochlear implants and children with typical hearing: Extending Kenett et al. (2013) by considering Hearing Age.
Purpose: Kenett et al. (2013) report that the sematic network of children with CI is less structured compared to the sematic network of children with TH. This study aims to evaluate if such differences are only evident if children with CI are compared to children with TH matched on chronological age, or also if they are compared to children with TH matched on hearing age. Method: The performance of a group of children with CI on a verbal fluency task was compared to the performance of a group of chronological-age matched children with TH. Subsequently, computational network analysis was used to compare the semantic network structure of the groups. The same procedure was applied to compare a group of children with CI to a group of hearing-age matched children with TH. Results: Children with CI performed significantly more poorly than children with TH matched on chronological age on a semantic fluency task and exhibited a significantly less structured semantic network. No significant difference in performance on a semantic fluency task was found between children with CI and children with TH matched on hearing-age. However, the structure of the semantic network differed significantly for the hearing age matched groups. Conclusions: Although the groups perform on the same level on a sematic fluency task, the semantic network for spoken language of children with CI is less structured compared to children with TH matched on hearing age. Reasons for this might be differences in the (perceptual) quality and the quantity of spoken language input.