scholarly journals PENGARUH MEKANISME CORPORATE GOVERNANCE TERHADAP TRANSPARANSI

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-67
Author(s):  
Dian Ramadhani ◽  
Raja Adri Satriawan Surya ◽  
Arumega Zarefar

This study aims to examine the influence of corporate governance mechanisms to transparency. Corporate governance mechanisms examined in this study include internal mechanism consisting of: commissioners, managerial ownership, foreign ownership, debt financing, and audit quality. The population in this study is a registered company in Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2015 - 2018. The sample in this research determined by purposive sampling method with a total sample of 103 annual reports. Statistical tests showed that the board of directors, managerial ownership, foreign ownership, debt financing has no effect on the performance of the company while the quality of the audit have an impact on transparency.

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-120
Author(s):  
Karina Karina ◽  
Sutarti Sutarti

The purpose of this research is to provide empirical evidence of the affect of ownership concetration, firms size, and corporate governance mechanisms on earnings management. Ownership concetration was measure by the biggest stock of individual or organization, firms size was measure by natural logaritma of net assets, and corporate governance mechanisms were measure by three variabels (composition of board of commisioner, audit quality were measure by industry specialize audit firm, and composition of audit committee). Earnings management was measure by discretionary accruals use Modified Jones Method. The population of this research is 41 companies in the banking sector which were listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX). The research data were collected from banking companies financial statement for the period of 2016 to 2018. Based on purposive sampling method. The reseacrh hypotesis were tested using multiple regression analysis. The results of this research show that firm size, firm of commissioner and proportion of commissioner have significant relationships with earnings management. Next, variables composition of board of commissioner, ownership concetration and specialize audit firm have no significant relationship with earnings management. Keywords: ownership concetration, firms size, corporate governance, earnings management


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 82
Author(s):  
Erwin Saraswati ◽  
Alfizah Azzahra ◽  
Ananda Sagitaputri

Corporate disclosure and corporate governance are two inseparable instruments of investor protection. This research sought to find evidence on how corporate governance mechanisms affect the extent of voluntary disclosures. Voluntary disclosures were measured using content analysis on published annual reports. The sample of this research consisted of 81 firm-year observations from 27 firms of consumer goods sector listed on Indonesian Stock Exchange from 2016 to 2018. Using multiple regression method, the result has shown that board size and board independence increase voluntary disclosures, indicating that the commissioners have effectively represented the interests of shareholders by monitoring and encouraging the management to increase disclosure. This research provided new evidence that family ownership increases voluntary disclosure, suggesting that family firms are more concerned by the costs of non-disclosure. Meanwhile, institutional ownership does not significantly affect voluntary disclosure. 


2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anyta, Siti Mutmainah

The purposes of this research are (1) to know the importance level of voluntary corporate governance disclosure (VCGD) in investor version and (2) to know the factual VCGD which is done by public companies in Indonesia and (3) to test determinants of VCGD existence in annual reports of public companies in Indonesia. The determinant of VCGD is a set of corporate governance mechanisms i.e. ownership structure and control mechanisms of the organ of the company, including (1) the concentration of ownership, (2) institutional ownership, (3) the percentage of tradable shares, (4) the proportion of independent commissioners, and (5) the independence of the audit committee. To know the rate of VCGD’s importance, the questionaires was distributed to investors by email. The mean score was used to indicate the importance level of each VCGD’s item in investors version. Based on this result then the relative disclosure index was calculated. A total of 74 annual reports of companies which was chosen by purposive sampling method. To test the determinants of level of VCGD, regression analysis was used. The results show that: (1)The capability and integrity of board of director and public access of companies’ information are the two most important items based on investor ’s opinions; (2) As a whole, public companies in Indonesia have higher level of VCGD then China’s which has shown by Yuen, et al. (2009); (3) The percentage of tradable shares (public ownership) is the only independent variable that has a positive and significant, while the other independent variables show no significant effect. This study provides empirical evidence for policy makers and regulators of Indonesia to improve the corporate governance mechanisms and transparency of public companies. These findings also contribute to improving the understanding of disclosure behavior among companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI).


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 65
Author(s):  
Kazbarani Alvino ◽  
Nurzi Sebrina

The purpose of this research is to examine the effect of corporate governance mechanisms that are moderated by fair value on the level of accounting conservatism. The corporate governance mechanism consists of an independent commissioner, an institutional ownership structure, a foreign ownership structure and audit quality.  Research conducted on manufacturing companies and financial companies listed on the Stock Exchange period 2016-2018, purposive sampling method was used to determine the research sample so that 93 manufacturing companies and 52 financial companies was obtained. Hypothesis testing is done by multiple regression methods. The results showed that the independence of commissioners had a positive effect on the level of accounting conservatism. In manufacturing companies, institutional ownership structure does not affect the level of conservatism, whereas in financial companies, institutional ownership structure influences the level of accounting conservatism. Other corporate governance mechanisms, foreign ownership and audit quality, do not influence the level of accounting conservatism in both manufacturing and financial companies. The intensity of fair value in both sectors of the company has a negative effect, or weakens the relationship of corporate governance mechanisms to the level of accounting conservatism Keywords: Accounting Conservatism; Fair Value; Corporate Governance


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 28-35
Author(s):  
Lulus Kurniasih ◽  
Sulardi Sulardi ◽  
Sri Suranta

Objective - This study aims to determine the effect of earning management and corporate governance mechanisms on corporate tax avoidance. Methodology/Technique - Corporate governance mechanisms use institutional ownership, the size of the board of commissioners, the percentage of independent commissioners, auditing committees, and audit quality as proxies. Meanwhile, earnings management uses the modified Jones model. The sample of this study include non-financial companies that are listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX) between 2014 and 2016. Findings - Corporate tax avoidance can be detected by using the effective tax rate (ETR), which is the ratio of income to tax expenses. This sample was chosen using a purposive sampling method, resulting in 871 firms. The results suggest that earnings management has a significant impact on ETR. Novelty - This study identifies that only independent commissioners and audit quality have a significant influence on ETR. Type of Paper - Empirical Keywords: Tax Avoidance; Earnings Management; Corporate Governance; Effective Tax Rate; Audit Quality. JEL Classification: G3, G39, G39.


2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 311-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonas Oliveira ◽  
Rogério Serrasqueiro ◽  
Sara Nunes Mota

Purpose This paper aims to assess the risk reporting practices extent to which firm’s and corporate governance characteristics explain risk-related disclosures (RRD) motivations across two European Latin countries (Portugal and Spain). Moreover, drawn on elements of agency, legitimacy, resources-based perspectives and institutional theory, this study also intends to assess whether the influence of corporate governance mechanisms on risk reporting is mediated by strategic/institutional legitimacy interests. Design/methodology/approach From a sample of 60 non-finance Portuguese and Spanish companies with securities traded on the Euronext Lisbon stock exchange market and on the Madrid stock exchange market, respectively, at December, 2011, the Corporate Governance reports and the “risk/risk management” sections of the Management reports included on consolidated annual reports for 2011 were manually content analysed, according to prior literature. Further, multiple linear regressions were used to assess the potential relationships between corporate governance mechanisms and risk reporting. The paper’s theoretical framework draws on elements of agency, legitimacy, resources-based perspectives and institutional theory. To understand the risk reporting practices of Portuguese and Spanish non-finance listed companies, the paper conducts a content analysis of 60 consolidated annual reports for 2011. Findings Results indicate that visible companies, operating in a country with a weaker legal environment, and during periods of financial distress disclose more discretionary RRD, basically to contextualize their negative outcomes. Some corporate governance mechanisms were crucial to improve risk information. Originality/value The paper goes beyond prior literature work and assesses whether the theoretical framework grounded on agency, legitimacy, resources-based perspective and institutional theory is suitable in explaining RRD in an under-researched setting (European Latin countries, such as Portugal and Spain, with low agency costs and different corporate governance models). Moreover, the analysis embraces a wider and homogeneous range of internal and external corporate governance mechanisms and uses a period in which both countries were severely affected by a sovereign debt crisis with negative impacts on company’s liquidity and financial risks. A research setting like this has not been studied hitherto.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 267
Author(s):  
Alvin Pranata Nanang ◽  
Hendang Tanusdjaja

Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk menguji bagaimana pengaruh mekanisme tata kelola perusahaan (corporate governance) dalam hal ini yaitu: kepemilikan institusional, kepemilikan manajerial, komite audit, dan dewan komisaris independen terhadap kualitas laba dengan manajemen laba sebagai variabel intervening. Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini ialah data sekunder yang diperoleh melalui laporan keuangan dan laporan tahunan dari masing-masing perusahaan. Laporan keuangan dan laporan tahunan tersebut diperoleh melalui www.idx.co.id.  Analisis data dalam penelitian ini yaitu analisis jalur dengan SEM dengan menggunakan SMARTPLS 3. Populasi dalam penelitian ini ialah seluruh perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di BEI pada periode 2015-2017, dengan total sampel sebesar 28 perusahaan. Hasil penelitian ini membuktikan bahwa mekanisme corporate governance dalam hal ini yaitu: kepemilikan institusional, kepemilikan manajerial, komite audit, dan dewan komisaris independen tidak memiliki pengaruh signifikan baik terhadap manajemen laba maupun kualitas laba. Manajemen laba berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kualitas laba. Mekanisme corporate governance dalam penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa hanya kepemilikan institusional dan dewan komisaris independen yang memiliki pengaruh signifikan terhadap kualitas laba dengan manajemen laba sebagai variabel intervening, sedangkan kepemilikan manajerial dan komite audit tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kualitas laba dengan manajemen laba sebagai variabel intervening. This study was conducted to examine how the influence of corporate governance mechanisms in this case, namely: institutional ownership, managerial ownership, audit committee, and independent board of commissioners on earnings quality with earnings management as an intervening variable. The data used in this study are secondary data obtained through financial reports and annual reports from each company. The financial statements and annual reports are obtained through www.idx.co.id. Analysis of the data in this study is path analysis with SEM using SMARTPLS 3. The population in this study are all manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the period 2015-2017, with a total sample of 28 companies. The results of this study prove that corporate governance mechanisms in this case are: institutional ownership, managerial ownership, audit committee, and the independent board of commissioners do not have a significant effect both on earnings management and earnings quality. Earnings management has a significant effect on earnings quality. The corporate governance mechanism in this study shows that only institutional ownership and independent board of commissioners have a significant influence on earnings quality with earnings management as an intervening variable, while managerial ownership and audit committees do not significantly influence earnings quality with earnings management as an intervening variable.


2021 ◽  
pp. 57-79
Author(s):  
Cheng-Wen Lee Lee ◽  
Yi Tang Hu

The present study examines the impact of corporate governance mechanisms on compliance with IFRS and financial reporting quality, especially focusing on non-audit service and accountant’s tenure. The adoption of IFRS is launched in Taiwan since 2012. The study aims to investigate this issue using a sample of 3997 data gathered from listed companies traded on the Taiwan Stock Exchange and OTC over the period from 2012 up to 2019. The results show the evidence to support that the collective effect of non-audit services/accountant’s tenure on audit quality has changed to be more influential. This research findings also open valuable insights to regulators, stock markets, practitioners, and academicians in this issue. JEL classification numbers: D22, G32, M41. Keywords: IFRS, Non-audit services, Accountant’s tenure.


2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-70
Author(s):  
Rhesa Theodorus Hanani ◽  
Christiana Fara Dharmastuti

The purpose of this thesis is to understand the effects of corporate governance mechanisms on the potential for bankruptcy. This study is done by utilizing the linear regression fixed effect vector decomposition model on 30 listed firms from the consumer goods sector of Indonesia Stock Exchange during the 2010-2012 periods. The results of the study indicate that: the board of commissioners’ independence and size of the commissioners’ board pose a significant positive effect on the potential for bankruptcy; the presence of an audit committee and the presence of a nomination and remuneration committee pose a significant negative effect and institutional ownership and managerial ownership do not significantly affect the potential for bankruptcy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1578-1596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thi Xuan Trang Nguyen

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of internal corporate governance mechanisms, including interest alignment and control devices, on the unrelated diversification level in Vietnam. Additionally, the moderation of free cash flow (FCF) on these relationships is also tested. Design/methodology/approach The study is based on a balanced panel data set of 70 listed companies in both stock markets, Ho Chi Minh Stock Exchange and Hanoi Stock Exchange, in Vietnam for the years 2007–2014, which gives 560 observations in total. Findings The results show that if executive ownership for CEOs is increased, then the extent of diversification is likely to be reduced. However, the link between unrelated diversification level and executive stock option, another interest alignment device, cannot be confirmed. Among three control devices (level of blockholder ownership, board composition and separation of CEO and chairman positions), the study finds a positive connection between diversification and blockholder ownership, and statistically insignificant relations between the conglomerate diversification level and board composition, or CEO duality. Additionally, this study discovers a negative link between diversification and state ownership, although there is no evidence to support the change to the effect of each internal corporate governance mechanism on the diversification level of a firm between high and low FCF. Practical implications The research can be a useful reference not only for investors and managers but also for policy makers in Vietnam. This study explores the relationship among corporate governance, diversification and firm value in Vietnam, where the topics related to effectiveness of corporate governance mechanisms to public companies has been increasingly attractive to researchers since the default of Vietnam Shipbuilding Industry Group (Vinashin) happened in 2010 and the Circular No. 121/2012/TT-BTC on 26 July 2012 of the Vietnamese Ministry of Finance was issued with regulations on corporate governance applicable to listed firms in this country. Originality/value This research, first, enriches current literature on the relationship between corporate governance and firm diversification. It can be considered as a contribution to the related topic with an example of Vietnam, a developing country in Asia. Second, the research continues to prove non-unification in results showing the relationship between corporate governance and conglomerate diversification among different nations. Third, it provides a potential input for future research works on the moderation of FCF to the effects of corporate governance on diversification.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document