scholarly journals Numerical Study of the Intensity Correlation between Secondary Flow and Heat Transfer of Circle Tube-Finned Heat Exchanger with Vortex Generators

2020 ◽  
Vol 123 (1) ◽  
pp. 237-256
Author(s):  
Yong Guan ◽  
Wanling Hu ◽  
Yun Zhang ◽  
Kewei Song ◽  
Liangbi Wang
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Exchanger ◽  
Secondary Flow ◽  
Numerical Study ◽  
Vortex Generators ◽  
Intensity Correlation ◽  
Flow And Heat Transfer ◽  
Circle Tube

Flow and Heat Transfer From the Annular Fin Heat Exchanger Using Winglet Type Vortex Generators

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Basanta Kumar Rana ◽  
Amaresh Dalal ◽  
Gautam Biswas
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Heat Exchanger ◽  
Thermal Boundary Layer ◽  
Numerical Study ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Vortex Generators ◽  
Flow And Heat Transfer ◽  
Finned Tube Heat Exchanger ◽  
Annular Fin

A numerical study of three-dimensional flow and heat transfer from the annular finned tube heat exchanger with built-in delta winglets is carried out. The delta winglets type vortex generators which are placed on the annular fin surface in the neighborhood of the cylinder are used to enhance the heat transfer. The winglets are placed in common flow orientation. Longitudinal vortices develop along the side edge of the delta winglets due to the pressure difference between the front surface (facing the flow) and back surface. These vortices interact with thermal boundary layer and produce a three dimensional swirling flow that mixes near wall fluid with the midstream. Thus the thermal boundary layer is disrupted and heat transfer is enhanced. The investigations are carried out for four different Reynolds number (100, 500 and 1000) and four different angles of attack (35°, 40°, 45°, 50°) for common flow up (CFU) configuration. It is found that heat transfer increases about 11% for Re = 1000 with angle of attack 40°.

Effects of Upstream Step Geometry on Axisymmetric Converging Vane Endwall Secondary Flow and Heat Transfer at Transonic Conditions

2018 ◽  
Vol 140 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhigang Li ◽  
Luxuan Liu ◽  
Jun Li ◽  
Ridge A. Sibold ◽  
Wing F. Ng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Secondary Flow ◽  
Thermal Load ◽  
Numerical Study ◽  
Guide Vane ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Step Height ◽  
Temperature History ◽  
Flow And Heat Transfer ◽  
High Thermal Load

This paper presents a detailed experimental and numerical study on the effects of upstream step geometry on the endwall secondary flow and heat transfer in a transonic linear turbine vane passage with axisymmetric converging endwalls. The upstream step geometry represents the misalignment between the combustor exit and the nozzle guide vane endwall. The experimental measurements were performed in a blowdown wind tunnel with an exit Mach number of 0.85 and an exit Re of 1.5×106. A high freestream turbulence level of 16% was set at the inlet, which represents the typical turbulence conditions in a gas turbine engine. Two upstream step geometries were tested for the same vane profile: a baseline configuration with a gap located 0.88Cx (43.8 mm) upstream of the vane leading edge (upstream step height = 0 mm) and a misaligned configuration with a backward-facing step located just before the gap at 0.88Cx (43.8 mm) upstream of the vane leading edge (step height = 4.45% span). The endwall temperature history was measured using transient infrared thermography, from which the endwall thermal load distribution, namely, Nusselt number, was derived. This paper also presents a comparison with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) predictions performed by solving the steady-state Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes with Reynolds stress model using the commercial CFD solver ansysfluent v.15. The CFD simulations were conducted at a range of different upstream step geometries: three forward-facing (upstream step geometries with step heights from −5.25% to 0% span), and five backward-facing, upstream step geometries (step heights from 0% to 6.56% span). These CFD results were used to highlight the link between heat transfer patterns and the secondary flow structures and explain the effects of upstream step geometry. Experimental and numerical results indicate that the backward-facing upstream step geometry will significantly enlarge the high thermal load region and result in an obvious increase (up to 140%) in the heat transfer coefficient (HTC) level, especially for arched regions around the vane leading edge. However, the forward-facing upstream geometry will modestly shrink the high thermal load region and reduce the HTC (by ∼10% to 40% decrease), especially for the suction side regions near the vane leading edge. The aerodynamic loss appears to have a slight increase (0.3–1.3%) because of the forward-facing upstream step geometry but is slightly reduced (by 0.1–0.3%) by the presence of the backward upstream step geometry.

scholarly journals Numerical Study on Flow and Heat Transfer Mechanisms in the Heat Exchanger Channel with V-Orifice at Various Blockage Ratios, Gap Spacing Ratios, and Flow Directions

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amnart Boonloi ◽  
Withada Jedsadaratanachai
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Exchanger ◽  
Numerical Study ◽  
Numerical Results ◽  
Blockage Ratio ◽  
Maximum Heat ◽  
Flow And Heat Transfer ◽  
Maximum Heat Transfer ◽  
Smooth Channel ◽  
Gap Spacing

Numerical assessments in the square channel heat exchanger installed with various parameters of V-orifices are presented. The V-orifice is installed in the heat exchanger channel with gap spacing between the upper-lower edges of the orifice and the channel wall. The purposes of the design are to reduce the pressure loss, increase the vortex strength, and increase the turbulent mixing of the flow. The influence of the blockage ratio and V-orifice arrangement is investigated. The blockage ratio, b/H, of the V-orifice is varied in the range 0.05–0.30. The V-tip of the V-orifice pointing downstream (V-downstream) is compared with the V-tip pointing upstream (V-upstream) by both flow and heat transfer. The numerical results are reported in terms of flow visualization and heat transfer pattern in the test section. The thermal performance assessments in terms of Nusselt number, friction factor, and thermal enhancement factor are also concluded. The numerical results reveal that the maximum heat transfer enhancement is found to be around 26.13 times higher than the smooth channel, while the optimum TEF is around 3.2. The suggested gap spacing for the present configuration of the V-orifice channel is around 5–10%.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document