scholarly journals Experimental Study of Counter to Cross Flow Air-Cooled Heat Exchanger using different Fins pitch with Internal Circular Grooving

Author(s):  
Rishi Kumar ◽  
Parag Mishra ◽  
Ajay Singh

In this manuscript we have presented seven variation of Air-Cooled Heat Exchanger (ACHE) design with internal grooving annular tube, all of them are having variable number of aluminum rectangular fins with different distances between the fins. In the proposed design we get the value of heat transfer rate of a counter to cross flow ACHE is 7062.95 watt, 3969.78 watt, 2724.15 watt, 2149.25 watt, 1785.03 watt, 1533.43 watt, and 1325.34 watt in natural convection (without fan) for 5 mm, 10 mm, 15mm, 20 mm, 25 mm, 30 mm and 35 mm respectively. On the other hand the value of heat transfer rate in forced convection (with fan) are 7100.40 watt, 3995.30 watt, 2740.54 watt, 2162.26 watt, 17897.63 watt, 1540.00 watt, and 1331.60 watt for 5 mm, 10 mm, 15mm, 20 mm, 25 mm, 30 mm and 35 mm respectively.

Author(s):  
Rakesh Kumar Tiwari ◽  
Ajay Singh ◽  
Parag Mishra

In this manuscript we have presented eight variation of Air-Cooled Heat Exchanger (ACHE) design with internal spiral grooving, all of them are having variable number of rectangular copper fins with different distances between the fins. In the proposed design we get the value of heat transfer rate of a counter to cross flow ACHE is 7833.77 watt, 4068.13 watt, 2736.95 watt, 2161.49 watt, 1802.89 watt, 1546.44 watt, 1336.51 watt and 1165.74 watt in natural convection (without fan) for 0.5 cm, 1.0 cm, 1.5 cm, 2.0 cm, 2.5 cm, 3.0 cm, 3.5 cm and 4.0 cm respectively. Then again, value of rate of heat transfer in forced convection (with fan) are 8007.46 watt, 4084.81 watt, 2754.69 watt, 2205.98 watt, 1809.24 watt, 1555.39 watt, 1352.88 watt and 1172.78 watt for 0.5 cm, 1.0 cm, 1.5cm, 2.0 cm, 2.5 cm, 3.0 cm, 3.5 cm and 4.0 cm respectively.


2013 ◽  
Vol 388 ◽  
pp. 149-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mazlan Abdul Wahid ◽  
Ahmad Ali Gholami ◽  
H.A. Mohammed

In the present work, laminar cross flow forced convective heat transfer of nanofluid over tube banks with various geometry under constant wall temperature condition is investigated numerically. We used nanofluid instead of pure fluid ,as external cross flow, because of its potential to increase heat transfer of system. The effect of the nanofluid on the compact heat exchanger performance was studied and compared to that of a conventional fluid.The two-dimensional steady state Navier-Stokes equations and the energy equation governing laminar incompressible flow are solved using a Finite volume method for the case of flow across an in-line bundle of tube banks as commercial compact heat exchanger. The nanofluid used was alumina-water 4% and the performance was compared with water. In this paper, the effect of parameters such as various tube shapes ( flat, circle, elliptic), and heat transfer comparison between nanofluid and pure fluid is studied. Temperature profile, heat transfer coefficient and pressure profile were obtained from the simulations and the performance was discussed in terms of heat transfer rate and performance index. Results indicated enhanced performance in the use of a nanofluid, and slight penalty in pressure drop. The increase in Reynolds number caused an increase in the heat transfer rate and a decrease in the overall bulk temperature of the cold fluid. The results show that, for a given heat duty, a mas flow rate required of the nanofluid is lower than that of water causing lower pressure drop. Consequently, smaller equipment and less pumping power are required.


Author(s):  
Ahmad Fakheri

The heat exchanger efficiency is defined as the ratio of the actual heat transfer in a heat exchanger to the optimum heat transfer rate. The optimum heat transfer rate, qopt, is given by the product of UA and the Arithmetic Mean Temperature Difference, which is the difference between the average temperatures of hot and cold fluids. The actual rate of heat transfer in a heat exchanger is always less than this optimum value, which takes place in an ideal balanced counter flow heat exchanger. It has been shown that for parallel flow, counter flow, and shell and tube heat exchanger the efficiency is only a function of a single nondimensional parameter called Fin Analogy Number. The function defining the efficiency of these heat exchangers is identical to that of a constant area fin with an insulated tip. This paper presents exact expressions for the efficiencies of the different cross flow heat exchangers. It is shown that by generalizing the definition of Fa, very accurate results can be obtained by using the same algebraic expression, or a single algebraic expression can be used to assess the performance of a variety of commonly used heat exchangers.


2013 ◽  
Vol 448-453 ◽  
pp. 3259-3269
Author(s):  
Zhi Wei Li ◽  
Hong Zhou He ◽  
Huang Huang Zhuang

The characteristics of the external heat exchanger (EHE) for a 4 MWth circulation fluidized bed combustor were studied in the present paper. The length, width and height of EHE were 1.5 m, 0.8 m and 9 m, respectively. The circulating ash flow passing the heating surface bed could be controlled by adjusting the fluidizing air flow and the heating transferred from the circulating ash to the cooling water. The ash flow rate passing through the heat transfer bed was from 0.4 to 2.2 kg/s. The ash average temperature was from 500 to 750 °C. And the heat transfer rate between the ash and the cooling water was between 150 and 300 W/(m2·°C). The relationships among the circulating ash temperature, the heat transfer, heat transfer rate, the heat transfer coefficient and the circulating ash flow passing through the heating exchange cell were also presented and could be used for further commercial EHE design.


2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (02) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Sikindar Baba ◽  
◽  
Oddarapu Kalyani ◽  

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (18) ◽  
pp. 7345
Author(s):  
Linlin Zhang ◽  
Zhonghua Shi ◽  
Tianhao Yuan

In this paper, a dynamic heat transfer model for the vertical double U-tube borehole heat exchanger (BHE) was developed to comprehensively address the coupled heat transfer between the in-tube fluid and the soil with groundwater advection. A new concept of the heat transfer effectiveness was also proposed to evaluate the BHE heat exchange performance together with the index of the heat transfer rate. The moving finite line heat source model was selected for heat transfer outside the borehole and the steady-state model for inside the borehole. The data obtained in an on-site thermal response test were used to validate the physical model of the BHE. Then, the effects of soil type, groundwater advection velocity, inlet water flow rate, and temperature on the outlet water temperature of BHE were explored. Results show that ignoring the effects of groundwater advection in sand gravel may lead to deviation in the heat transfer rate of up to 38.9% of the ground loop design. The groundwater advection fosters the heat transfer of BHE. An increase in advection velocity may also help to shorten the time which takes the surrounding soil to reach a stable temperature. The mass flow rate of the inlet water to the BHE should be more than 0.5 kg·s−1 but should not exceed a certain upper limit under the practical engineering applications with common scale BHE. The efficiency of the heat transfer of the double U-tube BHE was determined jointly by factors such as the soil’s physical properties and the groundwater advection velocity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document