scholarly journals Analisis Semantik Inkuisitif Peribahasa Bahasa Melayu (Inquisitive Semantics Analysis in the Malay Language Proverbs)

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (Number 2) ◽  
pp. 227-253
Author(s):  
Mohd Ridzuan Bin Md Nasir ◽  
Mary Fatimah Subet
Keyword(s):  
Inquisitive Semantics

Tujuan - Aspek pengajaran peribahasa harus dianggap sama penting dengan aspek-aspek lain dalam proses pembelajaran bahasa di sekolah. Peribahasa yang melambangkan kebijaksanaan masyarakat Melayu ini semakin terpinggir dalam sistem pendidikan dan menyebabkan falsafah dan akal budi penutur jati tidak dapat diekplorasi sepenuhnya. Semantik inkuisitif merupakan pendekatan kajian makna peribahasa yang melibatkan data, teori, kognitif, falsafah dan akal budi yang digunakan untuk memahami makna peribahasa dengan lebih mendalam dan menyeluruh. Kajian ini bertujuan menggabungjalinkan pendekatan semantik inkuisitif dengan kandungan pengajaran peribahasa melalui pendidikan Bahasa Melayu. Metodologi - Kajian berbentuk kualitatif ini menggunakan data-data peribahasa yang diambil daripada sukatan mata pelajaran Bahasa Melayu tingkatan satu hingga lima. Data-data peribahasa ini dikelaskan mengikut tema-tema yang diperoleh daripada kamus peribahasa. Seterusnya, Rangka Rujuk Silang (RRS) diaplikasikan mengikut kesesuaian konteks pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu. Penganalisisan ini berpandukan data korpus di Pangkalan Korpus Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka (DBP) dan buku-buku teks Bahasa Melayu sekolah menengah, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM). Dapatan - Hasil kajian ini mendapati dengan penggabung jalinan semantik inkuisitif ke dalam pengajaran peribahasa, pengkaji dapat mencungkil falsafah dan akal budi penutur jati di sebalik makna harfiah peribahasa tersebut dan menjadikan pengajaran dan pembelajaran peribahasa lebih bermakna. Kepentingan - Semantik inkuisitif dilihat dapat digunakan untuk mendalami makna peribahasa sehingga ke akar umbi di samping membantu guru Bahasa Melayu untuk mempelbagaikan kaedah pengajaran peribahasa.

scholarly journals When-questions and tense in Inquisitive Semantics

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
Jos Tellings
Keyword(s):  
Present Perfect ◽  
Inquisitive Semantics ◽  
Tense And Aspect ◽  
Semantics Of Questions ◽  
Present Tense

Temporal questions with when and their counterparts in other languages display tense restrictions: they are incompatible with the present tense that is interpreted as 'currently ongoing', and English when-questions are incompatible with the present perfect. The existence of tense restrictions is one of the reasons why a theory of the semantics of questions should include an account of tense and aspect. I first propose an explanation of the tense restrictions based on the pragmatics of questions and partial answers. Then, I discuss how tense and aspectual operators can be added to Inquisitive Semantics (Ciardelli, Groenendijk & Roelofsen 2018).

Lifting conditionals to inquisitive semantics

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 732 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivano Ciardelli
Keyword(s):  
Inquisitive Semantics

This paper describes how any theory which assigns propositions to conditional sentences can be lifted to the setting of inquisitive semantics, where antecedents and consequents may be associated with multiple propositions. We show that the lifted account improves on the original account in two ways: first, it leads to a better analysis of disjunctive antecedents, which are treated as introducing multiple assumptions; second, it extends the original account to cover two further classes of conditional constructions, namely, unconditionals and conditional questions. 

SUBSTRUCTURAL INQUISITIVE LOGICS

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 296-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
VÍT PUNČOCHÁŘ
Keyword(s):  
Fuzzy Logic ◽  
General Theory ◽  
Propositional Logic ◽  
Substructural Logics ◽  
Substructural Logic ◽  
Fuzzy Logics ◽  
Inquisitive Semantics ◽  
Semantic Framework ◽  
Noncommutative Version ◽  
Image Position

AbstractThis paper shows that any propositional logic that extends a basic substructural logic BSL (a weak, nondistributive, nonassociative, and noncommutative version of Full Lambek logic with a paraconsistent negation) can be enriched with questions in the style of inquisitive semantics and logic. We introduce a relational semantic framework for substructural logics that enables us to define the notion of an inquisitive extension of λ, denoted as ${\lambda ^?}$, for any logic λ that is at least as strong as BSL. A general theory of these “inquisitive extensions” is worked out. In particular, it is shown how to axiomatize ${\lambda ^?}$, given the axiomatization of λ. Furthermore, the general theory is applied to some prominent logical systems in the class: classical logic Cl, intuitionistic logic Int, and t-norm based fuzzy logics, including for example Łukasiewicz fuzzy logic Ł. For the inquisitive extensions of these logics, axiomatization is provided and a suitable semantics found.

M-fuzzifying basic inquisitive semantics

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 7711-7723
Author(s):  
Li-Li Xie ◽  
Xiu-Yun Wu
Keyword(s):  
Inquisitive Semantics

ellipsis in inquisitive semantics

2018 ◽  
pp. 232-252
Author(s):  
Scott AnderBois
Keyword(s):  
Semantic Content ◽  
Inquisitive Semantics ◽  
Differential Behavior

Work in inquisitive semantics has developed an alternative-rich notion of semantic content which is uniform across questions and assertions. This chapter explores the ramifications of this view for the theory of ellipsis. It examines these issues primarily by focusing on the analysis of a particular ellipsis process in English: sluicing. Empirically, it reviews a number of arguments in favor of an account of sluicing incorporating inquisitive semantics, most notably cases where truth-conditionally equivalent sentences have differential behavior for sluicing. Theoretically, the chapter demonstrates how a theory of ellipsis building on Merchant (2001) but based on an inquisitive semantics helps address this data. Beyond this, it briefly discusses motivations for extending this sort of approach to other ellipsis processes and compares the proposed account with other potential ways of incorporating inquisitive semantics into a theory of ellipsis.

Weak Negation in Inquisitive Semantics

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 323-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vít Punčochář
Keyword(s):  
Inquisitive Semantics

scholarly journals Inferential erotetic logic meets inquisitive semantics

Synthese ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 192 (6) ◽  
pp. 1585-1608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrzej Wiśniewski ◽  
Dorota Leszczyńska-Jasion
Keyword(s):  
Inquisitive Semantics ◽  
Erotetic Logic ◽  
Inferential Erotetic Logic
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document