Crowdsourcing Public Participation Process for Solve Hoaks

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Musfiah Saidah
Keyword(s):  
Public Participation ◽  
Participation Process

What Is a Good Public Participation Process? Five Perspectives from the Public

2001 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 435-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
ROB KRUEGER ◽  
SETH TULER ◽  
THOMAS WEBLER
Keyword(s):  
Public Participation ◽  
The Public ◽  
Participation Process

Administering Public Participation

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Eckerd ◽  
Roy L. Heidelberg
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Policy ◽  
Environmental Impact ◽  
Public Participation ◽  
Impact Analysis ◽  
The Other ◽  
Public Administrators ◽  
National Environmental Policy Act ◽  
Environmental Impact Analysis ◽  
Participation Process ◽  
National Environmental

Participation and administration have long had an uneasy coexistence. On one hand, public participation in decisions that affect citizens is consistent with citizenship and democracy; on the other hand, much of what government does is complex and requires some level of technical understanding to make decisions. In this article, we report on public administrators’ perceptions of public participation and the ways that they understand the participation process. We find that public participation is managed by public administrators; they determine the extent of participation, shape the ways that the participation takes place, and decide whether or not participation is valuable for their work. In some cases, the process is rather democratic, whereas in others, it is not. We find that it is up to administrators to shape the spaces for participation and select the participants in a manner consistent with their understanding of the task to be accomplished. We explore this process in the context of Environmental Impact Analysis under the National Environmental Policy Act.

scholarly journals Public Participation Process at Local Government Administration: A Case Study of the Seremban Municipal Council, Malaysia

2015 ◽  
Vol 211 ◽  
pp. 505-512
Author(s):  
Suzie Mat Nurudin ◽  
Rugayah Hashim ◽  
Shamsinar Rahman ◽  
Nursyahida Zulkifli ◽  
Ahmad Shah Pakeer Mohamed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Local Government ◽  
Public Participation ◽  
Government Administration ◽  
Municipal Council ◽  
Participation Process

scholarly journals A Theoretical Framework for the Evaluation of Massive Digital Participation Systems in Urban Planning

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathias Hofmann ◽  
Sander Münster ◽  
Jörg Rainer Noennig
Keyword(s):  
Urban Planning ◽  
Urban Development ◽  
Public Participation ◽  
Continuous Improvement ◽  
Collaborative Design ◽  
Theoretical Framework ◽  
Digital Tools ◽  
Additional Criterion ◽  
Participation Process ◽  
Diverse Groups

AbstractUrban development that strives to meet democratic ideals and the needs of all stakeholders must incorporate public participation. Contemporary participation processes may employ digital tools that open new possibilities regarding the range of participants and the intensity of participation. In particular, they can uniquely allow for large and diverse groups of participants to be involved in collaborative design processes. Evaluating such processes is important because it allows for the justification of the necessary costs and efforts, as well as continuous improvement. Using the phases specified in the minimal viable process of the U_CODE project as an example, this paper aims at describing criteria for the evaluation of participation processes and propose several possible methods for their assessment. While the majority of these criteria resemble criteria traditionally used to assess public participation in general, this paper proposes an additional criterion, as well as ways of applying all of the criteria to digital participation methods. In addition, the criteria and methods described in this paper not only may be used for evaluative purposes during or after a digital participation process but may also be useful guidelines during the planning stages of participation processes. Hence, it may help to consider these criteria to assess the value of the process during its inception stage to avoid mistakes and to enhance the democratic value of the participation process.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document