scholarly journals TELAAH KETENTUAN PIDANA KEKARANTINAAN KESEHATAN BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 6 TAHUN 2018 BAGI KESEHATAN NOTARIS DAN MASYARAKAT ERA PANDEMI COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 74
Author(s):  
M. Aris Munandar ◽  
Audyna Mayasari Muin ◽  
Hijrah Adhyanti Mirzana
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Policy ◽  
Penal Policy ◽  
Public Health Emergencies ◽  
Integrative System ◽  
Legal Uncertainty ◽  
Legal Policies ◽  
The Ideal

 Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kebijakan hukum pidana yang menghambat penerapan status darurat kesehatan masyarakat pada saat diselenggarakan kekarantinaan kesehatan dan menganalisis sistem pemidanaan yang ideal untuk diterapkan bagi pelaku tindak pidana kekarantinaan kesehatan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara teoretis kebijakan hukum pidana dalam darurat kesehatan masyarakat sulit untuk diterapkan. Substansi Pasal 93 UU Kekarantinaan Kesehatan memuat 2 (dua) jenis delik, yaitu delik formil dan delik materiel. Namun, terdapat penggunaan kata yang masih abstrak di antaranya: perbuatan “menghalang-halangi” serta menempatkan “kedaruratan kesehatan” sebagai “sebab” dalam peraturan tersebut merupakan sebuah kerancuan. Seharusnya rumusan kausalitas pidana dalam sebuah produk hukum pidana dirumuskan sesuai dengan konsepsi awalnya. Oleh karena itu, rumusan delik yang abstrak atau luas akan menghasilkan ketidakpastian hukum, berpotensi tidak dapat diterapkan, dan bertentangan dengan penafsiran yang menyatakan bahwa hukum pidana harus ditafsirkan secara sempit. Merujuk pada keadaan tersebut, maka sistem pemidanaan yang ideal diterapkan ketika terjadi pelanggaran penyelenggaraan kekarantinaan kesehatan, yaitu sistem pemidanaan yang bersifat restoratif dan integratif.Kata kunci: Pandemi Covid-19, Kekarantinaan Kesehatan, Kebijakan Hukum Pidana AbstractThis study aims to determine the legal policy policies that apply Law Number 6 of 2018 concerning Health Quarantine and analyze the ideal punishment system to be applied to health quarantine crimes. The research method used, namely normative research through an invited approach (statute approach). The results show that legal policies in public health emergencies are difficult to implement. The substance of Article 93 of the Health Quarantine Law contains 2 types of offenses, namely formal offenses and material offenses. However, there is a use of the word which is still abstract beside: the act of "obstructing" and placing "health emergency" as "cause" in the regulation is a confusion. The formulation of criminal causality in a criminal law product should be formulated in accordance with its initial conception. Therefore, the abstract or broad formulation of offenses will provide legal uncertainty, which cannot be applied, and contradicts the interpretation which states that criminal law must be interpreted narrowly. Referring to this situation, the ideal punishment system is applied when implementing health quarantine, namely a restorative and integrative system of punishment.Keywords: Covid-19 Pandemic, Health Quarantine Act, Penal Policy

scholarly journals THE LEGAL STRATEGY OF TREATING TELEMATICS CRIMES IN THE FIELD OF ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS IN GLOBAL TRADE

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 374
Author(s):  
Dian Alan Setiawan ◽  
Abdul Rohman ◽  
Fabian Fadhly Jambak ◽  
Alfiyan Umbara ◽  
Mia Oktafiani Mulia Oktafiani Mulia
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Global Trade ◽  
Penal Policy ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Electronic Transactions ◽  
Border Trade ◽  
Legal Strategy ◽  
Legal Policies ◽  
Two Stages ◽  
Transaction Activities

Economic globalization that is sweeping the world today began with the development of transportation facilities and cross-border trade. One of the facilities in the internet world to support economic activity is Electronic Transactions. In Indonesia, problems that arise due to the use of transaction media through telematics technology continue without being followed by the existence of laws that regulate it (cyber law). This study aims to determine legal policies against crime in electronic transaction activities in various sources of positive criminal law in Indonesia and to determine strategies for overcoming telematics crimes in the field of electronic transactions in global trade. This research is a normative legal research that is finding a rule of law, legal principles, and legal doctrines in order to answer the legal issues faced. The results of this study explain the legal policy against crime in electronic transaction activities in various sources of positive criminal law in Indonesia carried out in two stages, namely the Applicative Stage and the Formulation Stage and explain the Legal Strategy for Combating Telematics Crime in the Field of Electronic Transactions in Global Trade which is carried out through the Penalty Policy and non-penal policy.

scholarly journals Pembaruan Pilar Hukum Pidana Dalam RUU KUHP

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 291
Author(s):  
Faisal Faisal ◽  
Muhammad Rustamaji
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Research Study ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Law Reform ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Discussion Section ◽  
The Ideal

The basic idea underlying the reform of  the Criminal Code Bill has an impact on reforming the pillars of criminal law. The purpose of this research is to find out the new direction of criminal law policy regarding criminal acts, criminal responsibility and punishment. The research method uses normative legal research. The results of the research study in the discussion section are the reform of the pillars of criminal law, namely criminal acts, criminal liability, and punishment oriented to the basic idea of ??the value of balance. The reform of the pillars of criminal acts is aimed at broadening the meaning of the legality principle which provides space for living law as a source of law and also creates juridical terminology regarding criminal acts. The pillar of criminal responsibility accommodates the principle of no crime without error. The pillar of punishment is that the purpose of punishment is no longer synonymous with retaliation, but there are efforts to improve the behavior of the perpetrators of crime. The changes in the three pillars are influenced by the basic idea of ??balancing the values ??of Pancasila, namely the values ??of Divinity, Humanity, and Society. Recommendations in strengthening the direction of criminal law reform are needed in formulating criminal provisions outside the Draft Criminal Code that must be in accordance with the basic idea of ??balance which is the ideal of criminal law reform law. Ide dasar yang melandasi pembaruan RUU KUHP berdampak pada pembaruan pilar hukum pidana. Tujuan penelitian untuk mengetahui arah baru kebijakan politik hukum pidana mengenai tindak pidana, pertanggungjawaban pidana dan pemidanaan. Metode penelitian menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil kajian penelitian dalam bagian pembahasan ialah pembaruan pilar hukum pidana yakni tindak pidana, pertanggungjawaban pidana, dan pemidanaan berorientasi pada ide dasar nilai keseimbangan. Pembaruan pilar tindak pidana tertuju pada perluasan makna asas legalitas yang memberikan ruang pada hukum yang hidup sebagai sumber hukum dan melahirkan pula terminologi yuridis mengenai tindak pidana. Pilar pertangungjawaban pidana mengakomodasi asas tiada pidana tanpa kesalahan. Pilar pemidanaan bahwa tujuan pemidanaan tidak lagi identik pembalasan akan tetapi ada upaya memperbaiki perilaku dari pelaku kejahatan. Perubahan ketiga pilar tersebut dipengaruhi oleh ide dasar keseimbangan nilai Pancasila yaitu nilai Ketuhanan, Kemanusiaan, dan Kemasyarakatan. Rekomendasi dalam memperkuat arah pembaruan hukum pidana diperlukan dalam merumuskan ketentuan pidana di luar RUU KUHP harus sesuai dengan ide dasar keseimbangan yang menjadi cita hukum pembaruan hukum pidana

scholarly journals CRIMINAL-LEGAL POLICY OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION IN THE SPHERE OF counteraction to crime IN THE CONDITIONS OF GLOBALIZATION

2018 ◽  
pp. 9-17
Author(s):  
Vadim Avdeevich Avdeev ◽  
Olga Anatolyevna Avdeeva
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Social Adaptation ◽  
Urgent Problem ◽  
Legal Policy ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Policies ◽  
Law Making

The subject of the study is the mechanism for counteracting crime in the Russian Federation, taking into account the criminal legal policy implemented in the context of the globalization of international life. The purpose of the study is to study the effectiveness of modern criminal law policy, the methodological basis of which is to analyze the ongoing novelization of the criminal law and its effectiveness based on the state of crime at the federal and regional levels. The main results of the research reflect the problems of implementing criminal and legal policies in the sphere of combating crime at the federal and regional levels. Conclusions are drawn regarding the priority areas of the criminal legal policy related to the balance of criminalization (decriminalization) and penalization (depenalization). The scientific and practical validity of law-making processes was noted as an urgent problem. The problems of the implementation of the criminal law in the context of the accelerating rates of recidivism are discussed. They actualize the practical-orientational re-socialization and social adaptation of persons who have served a criminal sentence, improve the quality of the activities of institutions executing criminal punishment, and strengthen control by state authorities, self-governing bodies and civil society institutions.

scholarly journals Yuridis Tindak Pidana Tanpa Hak Membawa Senjata Tajam pada Putusan Nomor 538/PID.SUS/2018/PN.MDN

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 1057-1065
Author(s):  
Bram Candra ◽  
Ediwarman Ediwarman ◽  
Taufik Siregar
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Public Awareness ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Penal Policy ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right ◽  
National Police ◽  
The City

This study aims to find out about criminal acts without the right to carry sharp weapons in Medan City and criminal law policies against people without the right to carry sharp weapons in Medan City. This study uses a normative juridical research method with descriptive analysis with a case approach and a statutory approach, then the data analysis is carried out qualitatively. The results of the study indicate that the legal rules regarding the crime of carrying sharp weapons are regulated in the Emergency Law Number 12 of 1951 concerning the Regulation of Sharp Weapons, Law no. 2 of 2002 concerning the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia and Law Number 1 of 1946 concerning Regulations concerning Criminal Law. The driving faktors for the occurrence of criminal acts without the right to carry sharp weapons in the city of Medan are divided into internal faktors and external faktors. The criminal law policy against people who carry sharp weapons in Medan City consists of a penal policy and a non-penal policy where the penal policy is carried out by legally processing the perpetrators, followed by examining the defendant at trial. The non-penal policy is carried out by increasing public awareness through socialization, carrying out strict supervision by increasing raids and patrols, as well as the importance of parents' attention to their children.

Politik Hukum Pidana Indonesia: Analisis Korelasi Siyasah Syar’iyah dan Pencegahan Korupsi

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-31
Author(s):  
Edi Rosman ◽  
Aidil Alfin ◽  
Bustamar Bustamar
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Moral Values ◽  
Religious Communities ◽  
Legal Policy ◽  
Corruption Index ◽  
Legal Policies ◽  
Corruption Prevention ◽  
Positive Effect ◽  
Better Than

Corruption as an extraordinary crime is treated extraordinarily in Indonesia. The state’s treatment of corruption is part of the legal policies of the country. Indonesia is an anti-corruption country, but the corruption index is relatively high. The presence of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) seems more repressive as a representation of the current Indonesian criminal law politics. Indonesia is an anti-corruption country, but the corruption index is relatively high. The presence of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) seems more repressive in handling corruption cases as a representation of the current Indonesian criminal law politics. But prevention efforts have received little attention. Why have Indonesian criminal law policies not been oriented to the prevention of corruption? Ideally, efforts to prevent corruption in Indonesia use criminal law policies that are based on religious and moral values. Correlatively according to Islamic law, siyāsah syar’iyyah (Islamic legal policy) will have a positive effect on corruption prevention. Institutionalizing siyāsah syar’iyyah for prevention of corruption in Indonesia is relevant to the sociological conditions of religious communities. Is it preventing better than giving punishment? Emergency in dealing with corruption is the same as an emergency in dealing with morality. siyāsah syar’iyyah is used as a way of dealing with moral emergencies. Indonesian criminal law policy that is based on siyāsah syar’iyyah is the main solution in efforts to prevent corruption.

scholarly journals Kebiri Kimia sebagai Sanksi Tindakan dalam Double Track System

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 63-80
Author(s):  
Ahmad Jamaludin
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
Legal Policy ◽  
Chemical Castration ◽  
Sexual Crimes ◽  
Track System ◽  
Legal Sanctions ◽  
Double Track

The punishment policy in the form of chemical castration for perpetrators of sexual crimes is a confusing policy when viewed from the perspective of a double-track system. The application of castration sanctions is contrary to the purpose of action sanctions in the double-track system because it does not aim to restore the perpetrators, but rather to provide a deterrent effect and retaliation. So that the chemical castration policy is wrong because it is not in accordance with following the principle of action sanctions in the double-track system. The research method used is normative juridical using primary and secondary data and then analyzed qualitatively. This study aims to find out about the double-track system and to determine the action of chemical castration in the perspective of the double-track system. The results of this study show, First in the double-track system, the criminal system is known in two ways, namely, through legal sanctions and witnesses of action, legal sanctions are oriented towards revenge for their behavior while action sanctions are oriented towards improving the perpetrators so that they can be accepted back in the community. The two sanctions for castration are not included as witnesses for acts in the double-track system, because the basic idea is to improve the perpetrators, while chemical castration is more directed at retaliation. This research can be a reference for criminal law policymakers so that the legal policy does not get out of the basic idea of criminal law itself. Kebijakan pemidanaan berupa sanksi tindakan kebiri kimia bagi palaku kejahatan seksual menjadi kebijakan yang membingungkan jika dilihat dalam perpektif double track system. Penerapan sanksi tindakan kebiri kimia bertolak belakang dengan tujuan dari sanksi tindakan dalam sistem double track system dikarenakan tidak bertujuan memulihkan pelaku, namun lebih kepada pemberian efek jera dan pembalasan. Sehingga kebijakan kebiri kimia menjadi kebijakan yang keliru karena tidak sesuai dengan prinsip sanksi tindakan dalam sistem double track system. Penelitian ini menggunakan yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan data primer dan sekunder kemudian dianalisis secara kualitatif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tentang double track system dan untuk mengetahui tindakan kebiri kimia dalam per­spektif double track system. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan, Pertama dalam sistem double track system, sistem pemidanaan dikenal dengan dua jalan yakni melalui sanksi hukum dan saksi tindakan, sanksi hukum berorientasi pada upaya balas dendam terhadap prilakunya sedangkan sanksi tindakan berorientasi pada perbaikan pelaku agar bisa diterima kembali di masyarakat. Kedua saknsi tindakan kebiri tidak terma­suk saksi tindakan dalam double track system, sebab ide dasarnya perbaikan terhadap pelaku sedangkan kebiri kimia lebih mengarah kepada pembalasan. Penelitian ini dapat menjadi referensi pembuat kebijakan hukum pidana agar kebijakan hukum tersebut tidak keluar dari ide dasarnya hukum pidana itu sendiri.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document