Abstract
Aim
Elective surgery is becoming increasingly common in geriatric patients, particularly as the population is aging. The incidence of inguinal hernia in the elderly is also increasing. Lichtenstein inguinal hernioplasty is the most frequent procedure for the elective repair. There is ambiguity about the usefulness of antibiotic prophylaxis in inguinal mesh hernioplasty and the evidence for its value is still a matter of debate. Our aim was to evaluate the outcomes of Lichtenstein inguinal hernioplasty without antibiotic prophylaxis in geriatric patients.
Material and Methods
A database of patients aged 70 and more undergoing elective Lichtenstein inguinal hernioplasty was established. Patients were randomly categorized in antibiotic (received antibiotics) and placebo group (received placebo). Demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, comorbidity, hernia type, operating time and hospitalisation were analyzed. Infections were evaluated 1 week, 2 weeks and 1 month postoperatively according to Center for Disease Control criteria.
Results
Between 2015.-2019., 400 patients were evaluated, 200 patients in each group. All patients were operated under local anaesthesia with 24-hours hospitalisation. Groups were well matched regarding demographics, ASA-type, comorbidity, hernia type, operation time. Superficial surgical site infection developed in 16 patients from the antibiotic and 19 from the placebo group. Three from each group developed deep infection. Two mesh removal was required in the placebo group.
Conclusions
Prophylactic antibiotic usage in geriatric patients undergoing Lichtenstein inguinal hernioplasty did not show any significant beneficial efects in reduction of surgical site infection. Our results do not support the routine use of antibiotics for elective inguinal hernioplasty.