Conserving Histories: Chivalry, Science and Liberty

Author(s):  
Fiona Price

Chapter Four explores how, in the years leading up to the publication of Waverley, historical novelists recuperate the radical and reformist readings of history that had emerged during the post-French Revolution debate. Two overlapping strategies of reclamation emerge. First, as in the works of Anna Maria Porter, Jane Porter and Sarah Green, the radical emphasis on (non-chivalric) sensibility becomes an emphasis on chivalric morality. Second, the radical emphasis on rational historiography is co-opted, as seen, for all their differences in political perspective, in works by Elizabeth Hamilton and Jane West, which gesture towards scientific history. This absorption of reformist and radical energies into more conservative or cautious historical fictions facilitated a myth of modern gradualism against a background of secure commerciality; this myth would be problematized by Walter Scott.

Author(s):  
Mike Goode

Goode explores how Scott’s “potent historical fictions,” their “historically resigned but elegiac narrative of the Jacobite rebellions,” are deployed by Jefferson Davis, former President of the Southern Confederacy, to make sense of the “noble lost cause” of the American Civil War. For Goode, Scott’s own narrative “revivification” is best understood as an “ontological project of historical reenactment,” one that not only found resonance with apologists of the vanquished Confederacy but that is literalized in the long-running fantasy spectacle of the “living history museum” at “colonial” Williamsburg, Virginia.


2013 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 466-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon Graham

The aspiration to find a theological perspective from which to view political life is a very old one. The converse – seeking to view theology from a political perspective – is new. It is one indication, perhaps, of an important cultural reversal of religion and politics. In what, retrospectively, has come to be known as ‘Christendom’, people subjected political philosophies to the test of faithfulness to biblical truth because, they supposed, the ways of politics are, and should be, subservient to the ways of God. In the long shadow of the French Revolution, however, democratic consensus and human rights have become the touchstones by which religious practices, and even Christian doctrines, are commonly assessed and regulated. In short, the content of anything called a ‘Christian’ political philosophy is judged acceptable or unacceptable by secular standards.


IUSTA ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (37) ◽  
Author(s):  
JHON ANGEL ROZO

<p>La Declaración de los Derechos del Hombre y del Ciudadano de 1789 es un documento histórico que contieneun gran valor desde el punto de vista filosófico, jurídico y político. El presente trabajo es un esfuerzopor esclarecer cuáles son las fuentes que dan lugar a la redacción de dicho documento. Concretamente sedestaca el iusnaturalismo como modelo de fundamentación, y en él se enfatiza en el análisis de algunosde los pensadores más notables que influyeron en las ideas allí decantadas. Se concluye con la mencióna los debates generados acerca de las fuentes que dieron lugar a su redacción.</p><p>Palabras clave: Revolución francesa, Declaración de los Derechos del hombre y del Ciudadano, iusnaturalismo,doctrina.</p><p>Abstract</p><p>The 1789 Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen is a historical document containing a great valuefrom the philosophical, legal and political perspective. The present work is an effort to clarify the sourcesthat lead to the writing of the document. In particular, natural law stands out as a foundation model, andit is emphasized in the analysis of some of the most remarkable thinkers who influenced the ideas theredecanted. This article concludes with the mention of the debates about the sources that led to its writing.</p><p>Keywords: French Revolution, Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, natural law, doctrine.</p><p>Resumo:A Declaração dos Direitos do Homem e do Cidadão de 1789 é um documento histórico que contém umgrande valor do ponto de vista filosófico, jurídico e político. O presente trabalho é um esforço para esclareceras fontes que levam à redação do documento. Em particular destaca-se como um modelo de fundaçãode direito natural, e é enfatizado na análise de alguns dos pensadores mais notáveis, que influenciaram asidéias não decantadas. Conclui-se com a menção dos debates sobre as fontes que levaram à sua escrita.</p><p>Palavras-chave: Revolução Francesa, a Declaração dos Direitos do Homem e do Cidadão, a lei natural, adoutrina.</p><p> </p>


2016 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 137
Author(s):  
Dani Napton ◽  
A. D. Cousins

Few would deny Charles I’s uniqueness in British history. The voluminous interpretations of Charles since his execution amply indicate the impact of his myth on subsequent generations. This essay considers mythologizings of the executed monarch by Edmund Burke, Jane Austen and Walter Scott. These three writers, albeit to different degrees and in different ways, saw his pertinence to then-current debates against revolution, that is to say, to advocacy of counter-revolution at the time of or in the shadow of the French Revolution. Specifically this essay focuses initially on Burke’s Reflections on the Revolution in France which shaped the framework of much conservative thinking from 1790. Thereafter the essay considers affinities between Burke’s text (and his text’s divergences from) non-fiction and fiction by the politically conservative Jane Austen and Walter Scott. The focus is on two pre-eminent myths authored or authorised by the monarch himself which endured into and beyond the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries: Charles as the Royal Martyr and Charles as Christ (and, hence, as intercessor for his people).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document