scholarly journals PENGARUH PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK-PAIR-SHARE (TPS) DAN NUMBERED-HEADS-TOGETHER (NHT) TERHADAP MOTIVASI DAN HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-128
Author(s):  
Gunawan Maryoto
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Mathematics Achievement ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Experimental Research ◽  
Student Motivation ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Motivation To Learn ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
And Control

This quasi – experimental research aims to determinethe effect of cooperative learning model Think Pair Share (TPS) and Numbered Heads Together (NHT) on students' mathematics achievement, and the effect ofcooperative learning model TPSand NHT on student motivation.Three classes were randomly selected for experiment and control groups, each class consists of 32 students. A questionnaire of 26 items is used to measure motivation test, and a test consisting of nine questions is used for measuring mathematics achievement. T-test was used for data analysis. The findings show that there is significant effect of both cooperative learningTPS model and NHT model onstudent mathematics achievement. However, the effect of  TPS and NHT models on student motivation to learn mathematics is not significant.   Penelitian ini dimaksudkan untuk menganalisis  pengaruh pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TPS dan tipe NHT terhadap motivasi dan hasil belajar matematika. Penelitian ini melibatkan 3 kelas experimen dan kelas control, masing-masing terdiri dari 32 siswa. Instrumen yang digunakan berupa tes motivasi yang terdiri dari 26 indikator, dan tes matematika yang terdiri dari 9 pertanyaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan penggunaan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TPS terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa, demikian pula penggunaan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT juga berpengaruh positif terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa.  Namun tidak ada perbedaan signifikan hasil belajar matematika menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TPS dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT. Di samping itu ditemukan pengaruh yang signifikan penggunaan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TPSdan Tipe NHT terhadap motivasi belajar matematika siswa.

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE GI (GROUP INVESTIGATION) TERHADAP KETERAMPILAN GENERIK SAINS SISWA

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 297
Author(s):  
Sari’ah Sari’ah ◽  
Saiful Prayogi ◽  
Sukainil Ahzan
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
T Test ◽  
Generic Skills ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
And Control

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of cooperative learning model of group investigation type against scince generic skills of students. This research was a quasi-experimental. The population in the study was a grade VIII MTS Nurul Falah NW Lajut with 36 students. Sampling was derived by random sampling where the 16 students of VIII A as on experimental class and VIII B as a control class with 20 students.Based on pretest data analysis, obtained an average value of 31,25 experimental class and control class was 42,2.Posttest analysis showed an average grade of 65,75 experimental and control class was 61,6.  The data analysis technique was t-test. It show t- test= 5,80 and t-table = 1,67. Because of  t-count is greater than the  t- table, it can be concluded that there were the effect of cooperative learning model of group investigation generic against science skills of student.

scholarly journals Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Team Achievement Divisions (STAD) dan Think Pair Share (TPS) Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika Ditinjau Dari Motivasi Berprestasi

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Erny Untari
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Achievement ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Achievement Motivation ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Difficulty Level ◽  
Low Achievement ◽  
Discrimination Power ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
And Mathematics

The purposes of this study are to determine: (1) which one have a better mathematics achievement, students who taught by cooperative learning model STAD or TPS type. (2) which one have a better mathematics achievement, students who have high, middle, or low achievement motivation. (3) is there any interaction between learning model and achievement motivation towards mathematics achievement. This study is a quasi experimental research with 2x3 factorial design. The population of this study is all students XI Grade SMA N 1 Kwadungan in academic year 2016/2017. Sampling was done by random technique. The total of sample is 28 students, with details of 14 students for class experiment one and 14 students for class experiment two. The instruments used to collect data are test of prior knowledge in mathematics, achievement motivation questionnaire and mathematics achievement test. The trial of test instrument includes content validity, difficulty level, discrimination power, and reliability. The testing of hypothesis uses two-way analysis of variance with unequal cell. The testing of hypothesis concludes that (1) Students who taught by cooperative learning model of TPS type have better mathematics achievement than students who taught by cooperative learning model of STAD type. (2) Students who have high achievement motivation have better mathematics achievement than students who have middle and low achievement motivation, also students who have middle achievement motivation have better mathematics achievement than students who have low achievement motivation. (3) There isn’t interaction between learning model and achievement motivation towards mathematics achievement.

scholarly journals Motivasi Belajar Pendidikan Jasmani: Penerapan Teknik Memotivasi Teaching by Invitation pada Pendekatan Teknis

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 31-36
Author(s):  
Lutfi Nur ◽  
Arief Abdul Malik
Keyword(s):  
Physical Education ◽  
Student Motivation ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Learning Activities ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Technical Approach ◽  
Reliability Score ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
And Control ◽  
Experimental Group

In physical education learning activities, motivational factors become one of the key activeness of students in moving. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of a technical approach using techniques to motivate teaching by invitation to learning motivation in physical education learning. This research is a quasi-experimental study involving the dick group consisting of 25 students (12 male and 13 female) and the experimental group consisting of 23 students (11 male and 12 female). The instrument used was a motivation questionnaire with a reliability score of alpha Cronbah 0.896. The results showed that there were significant differences between the experimental and control groups with a t value of 3.022 and a significance of 0.004 0.05. The technique of motivating teaching by invitation effectively can increase student motivation in participating in physical education learning. AbstrakPada kegiatan pembelajaran pendidikan jasmani (penjas), faktor motivasi menjadi salah satu kunci keaktifan siswa dalam bergerak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui efektivitas pendekatan teknis menggunakan teknik memotivasi teaching by invitation terhadap motivasi belajar dalam pembelajaran penjas. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuasi eksperimen dengan melibatkan kelompok kontrol sebanyak 25 siswa (12 laki-laki dan 13 perempuan) dan kelompok eksperimen terdiri dari 23 siswa (11 laki-laki dan 12 perempuan). Instrumen yang digunakan adalah angket motivasi dengan reliabilitas skor alpha Cronbah 0.896. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan antara kelompok eksperimen dan kelompok kontrol dengan nilai t hitung 3,022 dan signifikansi 0,004 0,05. Teknik memotivasi teaching by invitation secara efektif mampu meningkatkan motivasi siswa dalam mengikuti pembelajaran penjas.

scholarly journals EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PROBLEM POSING PADA POKOK BAHASAN PELUANG DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) SISWA KELAS XI SMK DI KABUPATEN BOYOLALI TAHUN AJARAN 2013/2014

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidayat Bahktiar ◽  
Budi Usodo ◽  
Riyadi Riyadi
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Achievement ◽  
Experimental Research ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Group Technology ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Problem Posing ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

<p><strong>Abstract:</strong> This research aimed to find out: (1) which one gives better in mathematics learning achievement, learning model of Think Pair Share (TPS) with Problem Posing, Think Pair Share (TPS) or conventional, (2) which one have better in mathematics learning achievement, students having climbers, campers or quitters of Adversity Quotient, (3) in each learning model, which one have better mathematics learning achievement, students having climbers, campers or quitters of Adversity Quotient, (4) in each student’s level of Adversity Quotient which one gives better in mathematics learning achievement, learning model of TPS with Problem Posing, TPS or conventional. This research was a quasi-experimental research with 3 x 3 factorial design. The population of the research was all students class XI majors group technology, health and agriculture of SMK in Boyolali. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments that were used to collect the data were the documentation of mathematics achievement, questionnaire of Adversity Quotient and test of mathematics achievement. The technique of analyzing the data was two-ways ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The result of research showed as follows: (1) learning model of TPS with Problem Posing provided better learning achievement than model of TPS and conventional, learning model of TPS provided better learning achievement than conventional, (2) the students having climbers and campers had same achievement, and the students having climbers and campers had better  achievement than those having quitters, (3) in each learning model, the students having climbers and campers had the same achievement, and the students having climbers and campers had better achievement than those having quitters, (4) in each Adversity Quotient, learning model of TPS with Problem Posing provided better learning achievement than TPS and conventional, learning model of TPS provided better learning achievement than conventional.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Think Pair Share (TPS), Problem Posing, and Adversity Quotient (AQ)</p>

scholarly journals EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DAN NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER PADA POKOK BAHASAN BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN INTERPERSONAL SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KOTA MADIUN

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiki Riska Ayu Kurniawati ◽  
Budiyono Budiyono ◽  
Dewi Retno Sari S
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Achievement ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Direct Learning

<p><strong>Abstract</strong>: The aims of this research were to find out the different effect of each categories of learning model, students interpersonal intelligence and their interaction towards students mathematics learning achievement on the subject of plane geometry. The research was quasi experimental with 3×3 factorial design. The population was all students of grade VIII State Junior High School in Madiun City on the second semester of 2013/2014 academic years. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The sample of this research consisted of the students of SMP N 3 Madiun, SMPN 7 Madiun, and SMPN 10 Madiun. The sample consisted of 260 students. The hypothesis test used unbalanced two ways analysis of variance at the significance level of 0,05. Based on hypothesis test, it can be concluded that: (1) the cooperative learning model of <em>Jigsaw</em> type gives a better mathematics achievement than cooperative learning model of NHT type and direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of NHT type gives a better mathematics achievement than direct learning model; (2) students with the high interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the medium interpersonal intelligence, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had better achievement than students with the low interpersonal intelligence and the students with the medium interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the low interpersonal intelligence; (3) on the cooperative learning model of <em>Jigsaw</em> type, NHT type and direct learning model, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the medium interpersonal intelligence, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had better achievement than students with the low interpersonal intelligence and the students with the medium interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the low interpersonal intelligence; and (4) on students interpersonal intelligence high, medium and low, the cooperative learning model of <em>Jigsaw</em> type gives a better mathematics achievement than cooperative learning model of NHT type and direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of NHT type gives a better mathematics achievement than direct learning model.</p><p><strong>Keywords</strong>:  <em>Jigsaw</em>, NHT, interpersonal intelligence</p>

scholarly journals HASIL BELAJAR FISIKA MODEL PEMBELAJARAN LESSON STUDY DAN KOOPERATIF TYPE STAD SISWA MAN 1 KONAWE SELATAN

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 153
Author(s):  
Syafrial Syafrial
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Experimental Research ◽  
Lesson Study ◽  
Lesson Plan ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Average Score ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Model Type ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Quasi Experimental

This study aims to know the students’ learning achievement after studying under Lesson Study learning model at MAN 1 Konawe Selatan, under cooperative learning model type STAD and to investigate the significant difference between Lesson Study learning model and cooperative learning model type STAD.  The subject of the study is the students of MAN 1 Konawe Selatan class XI IPA. This study is a quasi experimental research which means that it is not a real experimental research because it included the basic steps of experiment but exclude the control class. The result indicates that there is different students’ physics learning achievement between using Lesson Study learning model and coopertive learning model type STAD. The students learning under lesson study model obtained 87 as their average score, while those with cooperative model type STAD obtained 67.3. In other words, learning by lesson plan model contributes more positively to students’ learning achievement than STAD model. This indicates that there are differences in physiscs learning achievement between lesson study learning model and cooperative learning model type STAD at students class XI-Science MAN 1 South of Konawe

scholarly journals THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE COLLABORATIVE LEARNING MODEL ON TRIGONOMETRY TOPIC OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT GRADUATE X USING OPEN-ENDED APPROACH

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Nurhayati Nurhayati
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Data Analysis ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Collaborative Learning ◽  
Experimental Research ◽  
High School Student ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Science Students ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Quasi Experimental

This study aimed to describe the effectiveness of collaborative learning using open-ended approach and open-ended approach in terms of problem solving skillss students. This study is a quasi-experimental research with the entire population of ten graduate science students of SMA Negeri 2 Ngaglik, Sleman, Yogyakarta which consists of four classes. The research samples were randomly selected from the four existing classes, in order to obtain class X MIPA 3 to be given collaborative learning model using open-ended approach and class X MIPA 1 to be given open-ended approach. Data analysis technique consists of one sample t-test used to investigate the effectiveness of collaborative learning model using open-ended approach and open-ended approach. The results show that collaborative learning model using open-ended approach is effective in terms of student’s problem solving skillss of SMA Negeri 2 Ngaglik, Sleman, Yogyakarta. But, open-ended approach isn’t effective in terms of student’s problem solving skillss of SMA Negeri 2 Ngaglik, Sleman, Yogyakarta.

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DAN MOTIVASI BELAJAR TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP PPKN PADA SISWA KELAS IV SEKOLAH DASAR

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-144
Author(s):  
Nazirin Nazirin
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Control Design ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Anova Test ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
The Subject ◽  
And Control

The research analyses the effect of cooperative learning model Jigsaw type and learning motivation on student’s understanding on citizenship subject. The research method uses quasi experimental design with post test only control design. The subject of research was 44 students which constitutes two classes, experiment and control classes. The data collection employs test and questionnaire. The data was analyzed using Two-way Anova test. The results show that cooperative learning model Jigsaw type hasa significant effect on student’s conceptual understanding. The ANOVA test produce significant level below 0.05, which indicates there is significant effect of the Jigsaw model and learning motivation on student achievement. It can be concluded that the cooperative learning model contributes better to learning achievement than conventional learning model, and a high learning motivation contributes better to students learning achievement in citizentship subject than a low learning motivation.   Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw dan motivasi terhadap kemampuan pemahaman konsep PPKn siswa sekolah dasar. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah quasi eksperimen dengan post test only control design. Subjek penelitian sebanyak 44 siswa yang terdiri dari 22 siswa sebagai kelas eksperimen dan 22 siswa sebagai kelas kontrol. Data dianalisis menggunakan uji Anova 2 jalur. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw yang positif dan signifikan terhadap hasil belajar siswa berupa pemahaman konsep PPKn siswa. Siswa dengan tingkat motivasi yang tinggi lebih baik dalam hal penggunaan model Jigsaw dan hasil belajar, dibandingkan dengan siswa yang mempunyai motivasi rendah. Terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan motivasi belajar terhadap kemampuan pemahaman konsep PPKn. Dengan demikian dapat disimpulkan bahwa model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw lebih baik daripada model pembelajaran ceramah untuk mencapai  hasil belajar yang lebih baik, dan bahwa siswa dengan motivasi belajar yang tinggi lebih baik daripada siswa dengan motivasi belajar yang rendah dalam penggunaan atau pemanfaatan model pembelajaran Jigsaw dan hasil belajarnya.

scholarly journals Model Cooperative Learning Tipe Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD): Dampaknya terhadap Motivasi Belajar Siswa

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Erly Erly
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Student Motivation ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Simple Random Sampling ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Electrochemical Reactions ◽  
Motivation To Learn ◽  
Student Teams ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
High Motivation

High motivation to learn will encourage and move students to always move and achieve the best results. The purpose of this study was to see an increase in student motivation through the cooperative learning model Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) type. The method used in this study is the Classroom Action Research (CAR) method. The population in this study were all students of class XII Science in SMA 2 Bandar Lampung. Sampling is done by simple random sampling technique. The sample in this study was 38 people. The analysis technique uses an independent sample t-test. The results showed that the implementation of the Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) type of cooperative learning model on the principles of redox and electrochemical reactions were used to test student learning. The results of this study also discussed increasing students' motivation to learn including motivation to cooperate with each other, discuss, help each other, and ask questions

scholarly journals Eksperimentasi Pembelajaran Interaktif Setting Kooperatif (PISK) dan Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) pada Materi Peluang ditinjau dari Aktivitas Belajar Siswa Tahun Pelajaran 2012/2013

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fhela Vhantoria Ningrum
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Achievement ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Analysis Of Variance ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Conventional Model ◽  
Balance Test ◽  
Student Activities ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Low Activity

The aim of the research was to determine the effect of PISK, STAD and conventional approach to the mathematics achievement viewed from student activities. This research was a quasi experimental using 3x3 factorial design. The populations of the research were all students of senior high school in Sukoharjo Regency. The sampel was 9 classes and it was taken using stratified random sampling technique. The instruments used to collect data were student activities questionnaire and mathematics achievement test. The requirements test for data included the population normality test using Lilliefors method and the population homogenity variance test using Bartlett method. The balance test toward student’s early ability in mathematics data using unbalance one-way analysis of variance and it was concluded that experimental and control classes had balance prior knowledge in  mathematics. The testing of hypotesis using unbalance two-way analysis of variance. The conclusion of this research shows as follows. (1) Students taught by PISK cooperative learning model had better mathematics achievements than students taught by STAD cooperative learning model and conventional model. In addition, STAD cooperative learning model and conventional model gave the same mathematics achievement. (2) Students in high activity had better mathematics achievement than students in middle and low activity; also students in middle activity had better mathematics achievements than students in low activity. (3) There was an interaction between learning model and activity toward mathematics achievement

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document