scholarly journals Impact and Sustainability of Antibiotic Stewardship on Antibiotic Prescribing in Visceral Surgery

Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1518
Author(s):  
Magdalena Monika Gruber ◽  
Alexandra Weber ◽  
Jette Jung ◽  
Jens Werner ◽  
Rika Draenert
Keyword(s):  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Antibiotic Consumption ◽  
Visceral Surgery ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Core Element ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Ward Rounds ◽  
The Impact

Background: Antibiotic stewardship (AS) ward rounds are a core element in clinical care for surgical patients. Therefore, we aimed to analyze the impact of surgical AS ward rounds on antibiotic prescribing, and the sustainability of the effect after the AS interventions are no longer provided. Methods: On four wards of the department of visceral surgery, we conducted two independent retrospective prescribing analyses (P1, P2) over three months each. During the study periods, the level of AS intervention differed for two of the four wards (ward rounds/no ward rounds). Results: AS ward rounds were associated with a decrease in overall antibiotic consumption (91.1 days of therapy (DOT)/100 patient days (PD) (P1), 70.4 DOT/100PD (P2)), and improved de-escalation rates of antibiotic therapy (W1/2: 25.7% (P1), 40.0% (P2), p = 0.030; W3: 15.4 (P1), 24.2 (P2), p = 0.081). On the ward where AS measures were no longer provided, overall antibiotic usage remained stable (71.3 DOT/100PD (P1), 74.4 DOT/100PD (P2)), showing the sustainability of AS measures. However, the application of last-resort compounds increased from 6.4 DOT/100PD to 12.1 DOT/100PD (oxazolidinones) and from 10.8 DOT/100PD to 13.2 DOT/100PD (carbapenems). Conclusions: Antibiotic consumption can be reduced without negatively affecting patient outcomes. However, achieving lasting positive changes in antibiotic prescribing habits remains a challenge.

Scope of Antibiotic Stewardship Programs in Pediatrics

2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 1291-1301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie Grammatico-Guillon ◽  
Lukman Abdurrahim ◽  
Kimberley Shea ◽  
Pascal Astagneau ◽  
Stephen Pelton
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Resistance ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antibiotic Consumption ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Large Variability ◽  
Search Terms ◽  
Inpatient Settings ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
The Impact

This review of pediatric antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs) summarized the antibiotic prescribing interventions and their impact on antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance. We reviewed studies of pediatric ASP, including the search terms “antimicrobial stewardship,” “antibiotic stewardship,” “children,” and “pediatric.” The articles’ selection and review were performed independently by 2 investigators, according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Twenty-one studies were included, from the past 15 years, increasing after the 2007 IDSA (Infectious Diseases Society of America) guidelines for ASP with a large variability of the programs, and the virtual exclusive focus on inpatient settings (90%): 16 formalized ASP and 5 non-ASP actions. A reduction in antibiotic prescribing in ASP has been demonstrated in the studies reporting pediatric ASP, but only one ASP showed a significant impact on antimicrobial resistance. However, the impact on antibiotic consumption in pediatrics demonstrated the important contribution of these strategies to improve antibiotic use in children, without complications or negative issues.

scholarly journals 229. Hospitalists Antimicrobial Scorecard Improves Antibiotic Prescribing at a Community Teaching Hospital

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S116-S116
Author(s):  
Julia Sessa ◽  
Helen Jacoby ◽  
Bruce Blain ◽  
Lisa Avery
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Rank Order ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Measuring antimicrobial consumption data is a foundation of antimicrobial stewardship programs. There is data to support antimicrobial scorecard utilization to improve antibiotic use in the outpatient setting. There is a lack of data on the impact of an antimicrobial scorecard for hospitalists. Our objective was to improve antibiotic prescribing amongst the hospitalist service through the development of an antimicrobial scorecard. Methods Conducted in a 451-bed teaching hospital amongst 22 full time hospitalists. The antimicrobial scorecard for 2019 was distributed in two phases. In October 2019, baseline antibiotic prescribing data (January – September 2019) was distributed. In January 2020, a second scorecard was distributed (October – December 2019) to assess the impact of the scorecard. The scorecard distributed via e-mail to physicians included: Antibiotic days of therapy/1,000 patient care days (corrected for attending census), route of antibiotic prescribing (% intravenous (IV) vs % oral (PO)) and percentage of patients prescribed piperacillin-tazobactam (PT) for greater than 3 days. Hospitalists received their data in rank order amongst their peers. Along with the antimicrobial scorecard, recommendations from the antimicrobial stewardship team were included for hospitalists to improve their antibiotic prescribing for these initiatives. Hospitalists demographics (years of practice and gender) were collected. Descriptive statistics were utilized to analyze pre and post data. Results Sixteen (16) out of 22 (73%) hospitalists improved their antibiotic prescribing from pre- to post-scorecard (χ 2(1)=3.68, p = 0.055). The median antibiotic days of therapy/1,000 patient care days decreased from 661 pre-scorecard to 618 post-scorecard (p = 0.043). The median PT use greater than 3 days also decreased significantly, from 18% pre-scorecard to 11% post-scorecard (p = 0.0025). There was no change in % of IV antibiotic prescribing and no correlation between years of experience or gender to antibiotic prescribing. Conclusion Providing antimicrobial scorecards to our hospitalist service resulted in a significant decrease in antibiotic days of therapy/1,000 patient care days and PT prescribing beyond 3 days. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Development of an Electronic Algorithm to Identify Inappropriate Antibiotic Prescribing for Pediatric Pharyngitis

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s188-s189
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Gerber ◽  
Robert Grundmeier ◽  
Keith Hamilton ◽  
Lauri Hicks ◽  
Melinda Neuhauser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Predictive Value ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Urgent Care ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
The Impact

Background: Antibiotic overuse contributes to antibiotic resistance and unnecessary adverse drug effects. Antibiotic stewardship interventions have primarily focused on acute-care settings. Most antibiotic use, however, occurs in outpatients with acute respiratory tract infections such as pharyngitis. The electronic health record (EHR) might provide an effective and efficient tool for outpatient antibiotic stewardship. We aimed to develop and validate an electronic algorithm to identify inappropriate antibiotic use for pediatric outpatients with pharyngitis. Methods: This study was conducted within the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) Care Network, including 31 pediatric primary care practices and 3 urgent care centers with a shared EHR serving >250,000 children. We used International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes to identify encounters for pharyngitis at any CHOP practice from March 15, 2017, to March 14, 2018, excluding those with concurrent infections (eg, otitis media, sinusitis), immunocompromising conditions, or other comorbidities that might influence the need for antibiotics. We randomly selected 450 features for detailed chart abstraction assessing patient demographics as well as practice and prescriber characteristics. Appropriateness of antibiotic use based on chart review served as the gold standard for evaluating the electronic algorithm. Criteria for appropriate use included streptococcal testing, use of penicillin or amoxicillin (absent β-lactam allergy), and a 10-day duration of therapy. Results: In 450 patients, the median age was 8.4 years (IQR, 5.5–9.0) and 54% were women. On chart review, 149 patients (33%) received an antibiotic, of whom 126 had a positive rapid strep result. Thus, based on chart review, 23 subjects (5%) diagnosed with pharyngitis received antibiotics inappropriately. Amoxicillin or penicillin was prescribed for 100 of the 126 children (79%) with a positive rapid strep test. Of the 126 children with a positive test, 114 (90%) received the correct antibiotic: amoxicillin, penicillin, or an appropriate alternative antibiotic due to b-lactam allergy. Duration of treatment was correct for all 126 children. Using the electronic algorithm, the proportion of inappropriate prescribing was 28 of 450 (6%). The test characteristics of the electronic algorithm (compared to gold standard chart review) for identification of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing were sensitivity (99%, 422 of 427); specificity (100%, 23 of 23); positive predictive value (82%, 23 of 28); and negative predictive value (100%, 422 of 422). Conclusions: For children with pharyngitis, an electronic algorithm for identification of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing is highly accurate. Future work should validate this approach in other settings and develop and evaluate the impact of an audit and feedback intervention based on this tool.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

scholarly journals Surgeon-led 7-VINCut Antibiotic Stewardship Intervention Decreases Duration of Treatment and Carbapenem Use in a General Surgery Service

Antibiotics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
Josep M. Badia ◽  
Maria Batlle ◽  
Montserrat Juvany ◽  
Patricia Ruiz-de León ◽  
Maria Sagalés ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Sharp Decrease ◽  
Antibiotic Consumption ◽  
Source Control ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Development Of Resistance ◽  
Multiresistant Bacteria ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Improve Patient ◽  
Therapy Treatment

Antibiotic stewardship programs optimize the use of antimicrobials to prevent the development of resistance and improve patient outcomes. In this prospective interventional study, a multidisciplinary team led by surgeons implemented a program aimed at shortening the duration of antibiotic treatment <7 days. The impact of the intervention on antibiotic consumption adjusted to bed-days and discharges, and the isolation of multiresistant bacteria (MRB) was also studied. Furthermore, the surgeons were surveyed regarding their beliefs and feelings about the program. Out of 1409 patients, 40.7% received antibiotic therapy. Treatment continued for over 7 days in 21.5% of cases, and, as can be expected, source control was achieved in only 48.8% of these cases. The recommendations were followed in 90.2% of cases, the most frequent being to withdraw the treatment (55.6%). During the first 16 months of the intervention, a sharp decrease in the percentage of extended treatments, with R2 = 0.111 was observed. The program was very well accepted by surgeons, and achieved a decrease in both the consumption of carbapenems and in the number of MRB isolations. Multidisciplinary stewardship teams led by surgeons seem to be well received and able to better manage antibiotic prescription in surgery.

scholarly journals Clinical impact of pharmacist-led antibiotic stewardship programs in outpatient settings in the United States: A scoping review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
James St. Louis ◽  
Arinze Nkemdirim Okere
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
The United States ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Pharmacist Interventions ◽  
Outpatient Settings ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Disclaimer In an effort to expedite the publication of articles related to the COVID-19 pandemic, AJHP is posting these manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. Purpose To provide an overview of the impact of pharmacist interventions on antibiotic prescribing and the resultant clinical outcomes in an outpatient antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) in the United States. Methods Reports on studies of pharmacist-led ASP interventions implemented in US outpatient settings published from January 2000 to November 2020 and indexed in PubMed or Google Scholar were included. Additionally, studies documented at the ClinicalTrials.gov website were evaluated. Study selection was based on predetermined inclusion criteria; only randomized controlled trials, observational studies, nonrandomized controlled trials, and case-control studies conducted in outpatient settings in the United States were included. The primary outcome was the observed differences in antibiotic prescribing or clinical benefits between pharmacist-led ASP interventions and usual care. Results Of the 196 studies retrieved for full-text review, a cumulative total of 15 studies were included for final evaluation. Upon analysis, we observed that there was no consistent methodology in the implementation of ASPs and, in most cases, the outcome of interest varied. Nonetheless, there was a trend toward improvement in antibiotic prescribing with pharmacist interventions in ASPs compared with that under usual care (P &lt; 0.05). However, the results of these studies are not easily generalizable. Conclusion Our findings suggest a need for a consistent approach for the practical application of outpatient pharmacist-led ASPs. Managed care organizations could play a significant role in ensuring the successful implementation of pharmacist-led ASPs in outpatient settings.

scholarly journals 1033. Effectiveness of a Physician-Driven Automated Antibiotic Time Out in the Setting of Gram-negative Bacteremia

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S363-S364
Author(s):  
Sana Mohayya ◽  
Navaneeth Narayanan ◽  
Daniel Cimilluca ◽  
Parth Vaidya ◽  
Alexander Malanowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Broad Spectrum ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Time Out ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteremia ◽  
Secondary Outcomes ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background In an effort to minimize complications associated with over-utilization of antibiotics, many antimicrobial stewardship programs have incorporated an antibiotic time out (ATO). Despite the increasing adoption of the ATO, limited data are available to support its effectiveness. This study was designed to assess the impact of an automated ATO integrated into the electronic medical record (EMR) on the rate of antibiotic modification in patients receiving broad-spectrum antibiotic(s) for Gram-negative bacteremia (GNB). Methods This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of inpatients from January 2017 to June 2018 conducted at a large academic medical center. ATO was implemented on October 31, 2017. Adult patients with GNB who received at least 72 hours of a systemic antibiotic were included. Patients with neutropenia or polymicrobial infections were excluded. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who received a modification of therapy within 24 hours of final culture results. Secondary outcomes included modification at any point in therapy, time to modification of therapy, time to de-escalation, and days of therapy of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Results There was a total of 88 patients who met inclusion criteria, 37 patients pre-ATO and 51 patients post-ATO. The primary outcome of modification of therapy within 24 hours of final culture results was not significantly different for patients in the pre-ATO and post-ATO groups (19% vs. 20%, P = 0.94, respectively). The secondary outcome of modification of therapy at any point in therapy was not significantly different between the two groups (62% vs. 66%, P = 0.67). Of the 47 patients who received a modification of therapy, the mean time to modification was significantly shorter in the post-ATO group (52.8 hours vs. 45.26 hours, P < 0.05,). All other secondary outcomes were not significantly different between study groups. Conclusion The ATO alert was not associated with a higher rate of antibiotic modification within 24 hours of culture results in patients with GNB, although there was a significant reduction in the time to antibiotic modification. Further efforts are needed to improve the time to modification and optimize antibiotic prescribing practices. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals 1119. Implementation of Pediatric Antimicrobial Stewardship Rounds in a Children’s Hospital

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S397-S398
Author(s):  
Natalie Tucker ◽  
Ezzeldin Saleh ◽  
Marcela Rodriguez
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antibiotic Consumption ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Custom Made ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Individual

Abstract Background Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) are required in all acute care hospitals per The Joint Commission. ASP must adhere to the recommendations laid out by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, but how each ASP chooses to implement these recommendations is left to the individual program. In January 2018, we began formal antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) walking rounds, led by infectious diseases trained physician and pharmacist, in our 99-bed pediatric hospital. Methods In January 2018, we started twice-weekly AMS rounds on the pediatric hospitalist service. A custom-made “Antimicrobial Stewardship Patient List” was designed in our electronic medical record (EMR) to generate a list of all patients receiving antibiotics. The ASP team (comprised of an infectious diseases pharmacist and a pediatric infectious diseases physician) reviewed EMR charts to determine antibiotic prescribing appropriateness and design recommended interventions. Any recommendations and teaching points were then discussed with the hospitalist team in person. After piloting the hospitalist service, AMS rounds were extended to include the general surgery patients and finally the intensive care unit. Data on number of charts reviewed, proposed interventions, and acceptance rates were collected throughout the process. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the intervention data. Results In the first year of the program, 427 patient charts were reviewed with 186 identified interventions. In total, 156 (84.3%) of the interventions were accepted and implemented by the primary team. The most common types of interventions were the duration of therapy (29%), antibiotic discontinuation (16.7%), intravenous to oral conversion (11.3%), de-escalation (10.2%), and infectious diseases consult (5.9%). Conclusion Pediatric AMS rounds led to the successful implementation of the majority of recommended interventions. Future goals of the program include calculating days of therapy per 1000 patient-days to assess antibiotic consumption before and after AMS rounds and to expand into other services to further promote appropriate antibiotic use in hospitalized pediatric patients. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Impact of an Antibiotic Stewardship Program in Long-term Care Facilities: A Nursing Home Network Experience

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S63-S63
Author(s):  
Fabian Andres Romero ◽  
Evette Mathews ◽  
Ara Flores ◽  
Susan Seo
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) implementation is paramount across the healthcare spectrum. Nursing homes represent a challenge due to limited resources, complexity of medical conditions, and less controlled environments. National statistics on ASP for long-term care facilities (LTCF) are sparse. Methods A pilot ASP was launched in August 2016 at a 270-bed nursing home with a 50-bed chronic ventilator-dependent unit. The program entailed a bundle of interventions including leadership engagement, a tracking and reporting system for intravenous antibiotics, education for caregivers, Infectious Disease (ID) consultant availability, and implementation of nursing protocols. Data were collected from pharmacy and medical records between January 2016 and March 2017, establishing pre-intervention and post-intervention periods. Collected data included days of therapy (DOT), antibiotic costs, resident-days, hospital transfers, and Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) rates. Variables were adjusted to 1,000 resident-days (RD) and findings between periods were compared by Mann–Whitney U test. Results A total of 47,423 resident-days and 1,959 DOT were analyzed for this study. Antibiotic use decreased from 54.5 DOT/1000 RD pre-intervention to 27.6 DOT/1000 RD post-intervention (P = 0.017). Antibiotic costs were reduced from a monthly median of US $17,113 to US $7,073 but was not statistically significant (P = 0.39). Analysis stratified by individual antibiotic was done for the five most commonly used antibiotics and found statistically significant reduction in vancomycin use (14.4 vs. 6.5; P = 0.023). Reduction was also found for cefepime/ceftazidime (6.9 vs. 1.3; P = 0.07), ertapenem (6.8 vs. 3.6; P = 0.45), and piperacillin/tazobactam (1.8 vs. 0.6; P = 0.38). Meropenem use increased (1.3 vs. 3.2; P = 0.042). Hospital transfers slightly trended up (6.73 vs. 7.77; P = 0.065), and there was no change in CDI (1.1 s 0.94; P = 0.32). Conclusion A bundle of standardized interventions tailored for LTCF can achieve successful reduction of antibiotic utilization and costs. Subsequent studies are needed to further determine the impact on clinical outcomes such as transfers to hospitals and CDI in these settings. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Assessing Effectiveness of Antibiotic Therapy Against Gram-Negative Bacteria in a Saudi Hospital Using a Drug Resistance Index

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s130-s131
Author(s):  
Muhammad Yaseen ◽  
Abdulhakeem Althaqafi ◽  
Majid Alshamrani ◽  
Asim Alsaedi ◽  
Farahat Fayssal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Resistance Index ◽  
Antibiotic Consumption ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Single Measure ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Impact

Background: Assessing the effectiveness of antibiotics and communicating the problem of resistance is essential when devising antimicrobial stewardship programs in hospital settings. The drug resistance index (DRI) is a useful tool that combines antibiotic consumption and bacterial resistance into a single measure. In this study, we used the DRI to assess the impact of introducing a new antibiotic restriction form on antibiotic effectiveness for the treatment of gram-negative infections in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: We conducted a before-and-after intervention study from 2015 to 2017 at King Abdulaziz Medical City, a tertiary-care facility in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The antibiotic susceptibility of gram-negative bacteria and antibiotic prescribing rates for antibiotics indicated for gram-negative bacteria were assessed to evaluate the impact of a new antibiotic restriction form introduced in the ICU in July 2016. Changes in antibiotic effectiveness before and after the intervention were evaluated by calculating the DRI for 4 of the most common gram-negative pathogens and 8 commonly used antibiotic classes. Results: The overall DRI for the adult ICU (59.45) was higher than the hospital-wide DRI (47.96). A higher DRI was evident for carbapenems and antipseudomonal penicillins + β-lactamase inhibitors. A. baumannii had the highest DRI, followed by K. pneumoniae in both the adult ICU and hospital-wide. After implementation of antibiotic restriction in the adult ICU, the DRI for carbapenems was significantly lower in the postintervention phase, from 31.61 to 26.05 (P = 0.031). Conclusions: DRI is a useful tool for tracking the effectiveness of antibiotics over time. The results highlight the importance of having effective antibiotic stewardship program in healthcare settings as well as regular feedback of antibiotic consumption data to the stakeholders to keep the antibiotic prescriptions in check, thereby ensuring their sustained effectiveness.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

scholarly journals 50. Impact of Antibiotic Stewardship Interventions on Colistin Use and Acinetobacter Resistance

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S145-S145
Author(s):  
Khalid Eljaaly
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Antibiotic Consumption ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Consultant Physician ◽  
Acinetobacter Spp ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Before And After Study

Abstract Background Our hospital had a widespread use of colistin and tigecycline, and very high resistance of Acinetobacter Spp. to colistin. The hospital did not have any infectious disease (ID) pharmacist and had only one ID consultant physician. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of our intervention on the utilization of colistin and tigecycline and resistance of Acinetobacter Spp. Methods This was a before an observational before-and-after study at a tertiary medical center. An ID pharmacist trained in antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) was invited by a tertiary hospital to help create an ASP. The hospital also hired four ID assistant consultants to help the primary ID consultant and pharmacists. The ASP started by restriction of colistin and tigecycline. The study outcomes were antibiotic consumption and resistance of Acinetobacter spp. Results Colistin utilization decreased by 60%, and the resistance of Acinetobacter spp. to colistin significantly decreased from 31% to 3% in a year. In addition, tigecycline utilization decreased by 46%. On the other hand, there were no significant changes in carbapenem utilization and resistance, which could be explained by switching from colistin and tigecycline to carbapenems. Conclusion Adding an ID pharmacist and ID assistant consultants to the ASP team, and the strict restriction of colistin use was associated with significant reduction in colistin use and Acinetobacter resistance. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document