scholarly journals Comparison of Postoperative Coronal Leg Alignment in Customized Individually Made and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 549
Author(s):  
Felix Wunderlich ◽  
Maheen Azad ◽  
Ruben Westphal ◽  
Thomas Klonschinski ◽  
Patrick Belikan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Postoperative Outcome ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Target Zone ◽  
Leg Alignment ◽  
Conventional Instrumentation ◽  
Cutting Guides ◽  
Total Knee

Neutral coronal leg alignment is known to be important for postoperative outcome in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Customized individually made implants (CIM) instrumented with patient-specific cutting guides are an innovation aiming to increase the precision and reliability of implant positioning and reconstruction of leg alignment. We aimed to compare reconstruction of the hip–knee–ankle angle (HKA) of the novel CIM system iTotal™ CR G2 (ConforMIS Inc.) to a matched cohort of the off-the-shelf (OTS) knee replacement system Vanguard™ CR (Zimmer Biomet). Retrospective analysis of postoperative coronal full-leg weight-bearing radiographs of 562 TKA (283 CIM TKA, 279 OTS TKA) was conducted. Via a medical planning software, HKA and rotation of the leg were measured in postoperative radiographs. HKA was then adjusted for rotational error, and 180° ± 3° varus/valgus was defined as the target zone HKA. Corrected postoperative HKA in the CIM group was 179.0° ± 2.8° and 179.2° ± 3.1° in the OTS group (p = 0.34). The rate of outliers, outside of the ±3° target zone, was equal in both groups (32.9%). Our analysis showed that TKA using patient-specific cutting guides and implants and OTS TKA implanted with conventional instrumentation resulted in equally satisfying restoration of the coronal leg alignment with less scattering in the CIM group.

A Multi-Planar CT-Based Comparative Analysis of Patient-Specific Cutting Guides With Conventional Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 1138-1142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kanniraj Marimuthu ◽  
Darren B. Chen ◽  
Ian A. Harris ◽  
Emma Wheatley ◽  
Carl J. Bryant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Conventional Instrumentation ◽  
Cutting Guides ◽  
Total Knee

scholarly journals Patient-specific cutting guides for total knee arthroplasty

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel MacDessi ◽  
Kanniraj Marimuthu ◽  
Venkatesan S Kumar ◽  
Darren Chen ◽  
Ian A Harris
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Cutting Guides ◽  
Total Knee

scholarly journals Intra-Operative Experience using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Based Patient Specific Cutting Guides during Total Knee Arthroplasty

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 22-26
Author(s):  
Ryan K. Albrecht ◽  
Alexander C.M. Chong ◽  
Paul H. Wooley ◽  
Tarun Bhargava
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Joint Replacement ◽  
Tibial Slope ◽  
New Technique ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Cutting Guides ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Operative Experience

Background. The incidence of malalignment in total knee arthroplasty(TKA) using conventional instrument has beenreported as high as 25%. A relatively new TKA system involvesthe use of a preoperative magnetic resonance image(MRI) to obtain accurate implant placement more consistently.For broad acceptance of this new technique, it iscrucial to analyze the initial intra-operative experience. Thespecific aim of this study was to evaluate the initial intra-operativeexperience of a single surgeon using this new technique. Methods. A total of 15 knees (12 patients: 6 female and 6male) were reviewed from TKA procedures using the selectedmanufacturer’s patient specific cutting guides between January2011 and April 2013 at a single institution. Patient demographicand specific parameters and intra-operative alterationsof component positioning were recorded and evaluated.Results. The preoperative plan was able to predict correctly thesize of the implanted femoral component in 87% (n = 13) andtibial component in 80% (n = 12) of the cases. However, 60% (n= 9) of cases required additional intra-operative corrections onfemoral resection, and 73% (n = 11) required an additional 2 - 4mm correction on the tibial proximal resection. Twenty percent(n = 3) required additional tibial varus/valgus correction, butthere were no tibial slope corrections for any of the 15 cases. Conclusions. The initial intra-operative experience of a singlesurgeon using current patient specific cutting guides for a selectedmanufacturer to align femoral and tibial components duringTKA has raised some concerns. We agreed with previous studiesthat caution should be taken when using patient specific cuttingguides without supportive data. The findings of this study providedadditional evidence to contest the accuracy of patient specificcutting guides with respect to the initial experience of an orthopaedicsurgeon who is trained in total joint replacement. Theresults provided more evidence to assist orthopaedic surgeonsin the decision of whether to use these patient specific systemsversus conventional TKA methods. KS J Med 2016;9(2):22-26.

CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL RESULTS OF TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT USING PATIENT-SPECIFIC POSITIONING GUIDES WITH AT LEAST 5 YEARS OF FOLLOW-UP

2020 ◽  
pp. 2050020
Author(s):  
Xabier Foruria ◽  
Jesús Moreta ◽  
Carlos Jaramillo ◽  
Ane Anton ◽  
Isidoro Calvo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Knee Score ◽  
Conventional Instrumentation ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Clinical And Radiological Results ◽  
Coronal Malalignment

Objective: Patient-specific positioning guides have been designed to improve precision in total knee arthroplasty. The aim of this study is to evaluate the medium-term clinical and radiological outcomes with magnetic resonance imaging-based patient-specific positioning guides. Material and methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients from two centers treated with total knee arthroplasty performed with patient-specific positioning guides. We enrolled patients operated on between January 2011 and December 2013, with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Preoperative and postoperative hip knee angle (HKA) and position of each component in the coronal plane were assessed. Overall malalignment was defined as an outlier of more than [Formula: see text] from the neutral mechanical axis and specific malalignment as when any component showed more than [Formula: see text] of deviation. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee Score. Results: This study included 68 patients with a mean age of 72 years. The mean postoperative alignment (HKA) was [Formula: see text] and 26.5% of patients showed coronal malalignment [Formula: see text]. Regarding femoral components, 19.1% showed specific malalignment [Formula: see text], while 11.7% of tibial components were classified as outliers. The mean HSS Knee Score at final follow up was 89.2. Patients whose implants were mechanically aligned did not obtain better functional outcomes ([Formula: see text]). Conclusion: In our series, the use of patient-specific positioning guides resulted in a range of mechanical malalignment, similar to conventional instrumentation results reported in the literature.

scholarly journals Patient-specific instrumentation improved three-dimensional accuracy in total knee arthroplasty: a comparative radiographic analysis of 1257 total knee arthroplasties

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leo Pauzenberger ◽  
Martin Munz ◽  
Georg Brandl ◽  
Julia K. Frank ◽  
Philipp R. Heuberer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Mechanical Axis ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Mobile Bearing ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Limb Alignment ◽  
Patient Specific Instrumentation ◽  
Conventional Instrumentation ◽  
Total Knee

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to compare restoration of mechanical limb alignment and three-dimensional component-positioning between conventional and patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Methods Radiographic data of patients undergoing mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty (n = 1257), using either conventional (n = 442) or patient-specific instrumentation (n = 812), were analyzed. To evaluate accuracy of axis restoration and 3D-component-positioning between conventional and patient-specific instrumentation, absolute deviations from the targeted neutral mechanical limb alignment and planned implant positions were determined. Measurements were performed on standardized coronal long-leg and sagittal knee radiographs. CT-scans were evaluated for accuracy of axial femoral implant rotation. Outliers were defined as deviations from the targeted neutral mechanical axis of > ± 3° or from the intraoperative component-positioning goals of > ± 2°. Deviations greater than ± 5° from set targets were considered to be severe outliers. Results Deviations from a neutral mechanical axis (conventional instrumentation: 2.3°± 1.7° vs. patient-specific instrumentation: 1.7°± 1.2°; p < 0.001) and numbers of outliers (conventional instrumentation: 25.8% vs. patient-specific instrumentation: 10.1%; p < 0.001) were significantly lower in the patient-specific instrumentation group. Significantly lower mean deviations and less outliers were detected regarding 3D-component-positioning in the patient-specific instrumentation compared to the conventional instrumentation group (all p < 0.05). Conclusions Patient-specific instrumentation prevented from severe limb malalignment and component-positioning outliers (> ± 5° deviation). Use of patient-specific instrumentation proved to be superior to conventional instrumentation in achieving more accurate limb alignment and 3D-component positioning, particularly regarding femoral component rotation. Furthermore, the use of patient-specific instrumentation successfully prevented severe (> 5° deviation) outliers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document