scholarly journals CD8+ Tumour-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Tumour Microenvironment Immune Types as Biomarkers for Immunotherapy in Sinonasal Intestinal-Type Adenocarcinoma

Vaccines ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 202
Author(s):  
Rocío García-Marín ◽  
Sara Reda ◽  
Cristina Riobello ◽  
Virginia N. Cabal ◽  
Laura Suárez-Fernández ◽  
...  

Background. Intestinal-type adenocarcinoma (ITAC) is a rare tumour occurring in the ethmoid sinus. Recent years have brought advances in endoscopic surgery and precision radiotherapy; however, five-year overall survival has not improved and remains at 35–80%, depending on tumour stage and histology. Therefore, there is a need for new therapeutic options. Methods. We evaluated CD8+ tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and tumour microenvironment immune type (TMIT, combining CD8+ TILs and PD-L1) as predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy in a series of 133 ITAC. All results were correlated to clinical and follow-up data. Results. The presence of intratumoural CD8+ TILs was low in 57% of cases and high in 8% of cases. Tumoural PD-L1 positivity was observed in 26% of cases. CD8+ TILs and TMIT correlated with the histological subtype of ITAC and with better overall survival. The presence of stromal PD-L1-positive macrophages was related to intratumoural CD8+ TILs. PD-L1 expression on tumour cells or macrophages did not show prognostic value. Conclusions. TMIT classification did not have additional prognostic value over CD8+ TILs alone. The modest percentage of CD8high/PD-L1pos cases indicates that ITAC is a lowly immunogenic tumour type. Nevertheless, a proportion of ITAC, especially the papillary and colonic subtypes, could benefit from therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Byeong-Joo Noh ◽  
Jae Young Kwak ◽  
Dae-Woon Eom

Abstract Background Colorectal adenocarcinoma is the third most common cancer worldwide and a leading cause of cancer-related death. The recent emergence of diverse immunotherapeutic agents has made it crucial to interpret a complex tumour microenvironment intermingled with tumour-infiltrating immune cells to predict the immunotherapeutic response rate. However, in colorectal adenocarcinoma, studies are lacking that provide detailed analyses of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) to elucidate their prognostic values and to identify immunotherapy-targetable subgroups, preferably with multiple immune-related biomarkers. In the present study, we categorize colorectal adenocarcinomas into four types of tumour immune microenvironments according to PD-L1 expression and TIL, analyse their prognostic values, and propose an immunotherapy-targetable subgroup.Methods Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples of surgically resected primary colorectal adenocarcinomas (n = 489) were obtained and arrayed on tissue microarray blocks. Immunohistochemical stains for PD-L1, programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), cluster of differentiation 8 (CD8), and microsatellite instability (MSI) were performed and evaluated.Results Tumour microenvironment immune type (TMIT) I (PD-L1-positive tumour cells and CD8-high TIL) and type II (PD-L1-negative tumour cells and CD8-low TIL) showed the best and worst prognoses, respectively. PD-L1 overexpression was significantly associated with MSI status. PD-L1 immunoreactivity was positively correlated with TIL having CD8 or PD-1 overexpression.Conclusions TMIT I subgroup showed stronger CD8/PD-L1/PD-1 signalling interaction compared to the other TMIT. Therefore, we propose that the TMIT I subgroup is a candidate TMIT to predict effective response rate for existing immune checkpoint inhibitors and determine targetable subgroups for emerging therapies.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Byeong-Joo Noh ◽  
Jae Young Kwak ◽  
Dae-Woon Eom

Abstract Background Colorectal adenocarcinoma is the third most common cancer worldwide and a leading cause of cancer-related death. The recent emergence of diverse immunotherapeutic agents has made it crucial to interpret a complex tumour microenvironment intermingled with tumour-infiltrating immune cells to predict the immunotherapeutic response rate. However, in colorectal adenocarcinoma, studies are lacking that provide detailed analyses of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) to elucidate their prognostic values and to identify immunotherapy-targetable subgroups, preferably with multiple immune-related biomarkers. In the present study, we categorize colorectal adenocarcinomas into four types of tumour immune microenvironments according to PD-L1 expression and TIL, analyse their prognostic values, and propose an immunotherapy-targetable subgroup.Methods Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples of surgically resected primary colorectal adenocarcinomas (n = 489) were obtained and arrayed on tissue microarray blocks. Immunohistochemical stains for PD-L1, programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), cluster of differentiation 8 (CD8), and microsatellite instability (MSI) were performed and evaluated.Results Tumour microenvironment immune type (TMIT) I (PD-L1-positive tumour cells and CD8-high TIL) and type II (PD-L1-negative tumour cells and CD8-low TIL) showed the best and worst prognoses, respectively. PD-L1 overexpression was significantly associated with MSI status. PD-L1 immunoreactivity was positively correlated with TIL having CD8 or PD-1 overexpression.Conclusions TMIT I subgroup showed stronger CD8/PD-L1/PD-1 signalling interaction compared to the other TMIT. Therefore, we propose that the TMIT I subgroup is a candidate TMIT to predict effective response rate for existing immune checkpoint inhibitors and determine targetable subgroups for emerging therapies.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Byeong-Joo Noh ◽  
Jae Young Kwak ◽  
Dae-Woon Eom

Abstract Background Colorectal adenocarcinoma is the third most common cancer worldwide and a leading cause of cancer-related death. The recent emergence of diverse immunotherapeutic agents has made it crucial to interpret a complex tumour microenvironment intermingled with tumour-infiltrating immune cells to predict the immunotherapeutic response rate. However, in colorectal adenocarcinoma, studies are lacking that provide detailed analyses of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) to elucidate their prognostic values and to identify immunotherapy-targetable subgroups, preferably with multiple immune-related biomarkers. In the present study, we categorize colorectal adenocarcinomas into four types of tumour immune microenvironments according to PD-L1 expression and TIL, analyse their prognostic values, and propose an immunotherapy-targetable subgroup.Methods Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples of surgically resected primary colorectal adenocarcinomas (n = 489) were obtained and arrayed on tissue microarray blocks. Immunohistochemical stains for PD-L1, programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), cluster of differentiation 8 (CD8), and microsatellite instability (MSI) were performed and evaluated.Results Tumour microenvironment immune type (TMIT) I (PD-L1-positive tumour cells and CD8-high TIL) and type II (PD-L1-negative tumour cells and CD8-low TIL) showed the best and worst prognoses, respectively. PD-L1 overexpression was significantly associated with MSI status. PD-L1 immunoreactivity was positively correlated with TIL having CD8 or PD-1 overexpression.Conclusions TMIT I subgroup showed stronger CD8/PD-L1/PD-1 signalling interaction compared to the other TMIT. Therefore, we propose that the TMIT I subgroup is a candidate TMIT to predict effective response rate for existing immune checkpoint inhibitors and determine targetable subgroups for emerging therapies.


Author(s):  
Gudrun Absenger ◽  
Angelika Terbuch

SummaryMalignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare tumour that originates from the inner linings of the pleural cavity. The majority of cases are associated with exposure to asbestos for what was banned in the European Union in 1991. Due to the long latency between exposure and onset (20–40 years) the peak of MPM in Western Europe will be reached within the next years. Often diagnosed at an unresectable stage, treatment options remain palliative in the majority of cases. The highly aggressive nature of MPM leads to a dismal prognosis with a median overall survival of approximately one year.Platinum-based chemotherapy in combination with pemetrexed has been the mainstay of first line treatment in unresectable MPM for many years. Only recently, check point inhibitors have found their way into MPM treatment. The results of the phase III CheckMate 743 trial last year have finally led to a paradigm shift in the treatment of unresectable MPM. This trial showed a significant overall survival benefit for the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab over standard chemotherapy, especially in nonepithelioid histology. Apart from histology, predictive biomarkers have not been identified for the treatment of MPM so far. Several trials investigating combination therapies with checkpoint inhibitors are currently ongoing and give hope to further improve prognosis for our patients.


2017 ◽  
Vol 70 (10) ◽  
pp. 860-867 ◽  
Author(s):  
António Polónia ◽  
Regina Pinto ◽  
Jorge F Cameselle-Teijeiro ◽  
Fernando C Schmitt ◽  
Joana Paredes

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18056-e18056
Author(s):  
Julie Elaine McGrath ◽  
Punita Grover ◽  
Joanne Xiu ◽  
Chadi Nabhan ◽  
Jennifer Hsing Choe ◽  
...  

e18056 Background: Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignancy of glandular tissue with a high rate of local recurrence and metastatic disease. Despite being regarded as an indolent disease, the clinical course of recurrent and metastatic ACC (R/M ACC) is highly variable. Responses to chemotherapy (chemo) are uniformly poor. Several multi-targeted tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (mTKIs), EGFR inhibitors (EGFRi) and other targeted agents have been studied in single-arm early phase trials with response rates ranging from 0-16% and progression free survival ranging from 2.5-17 months. However, there have been no comparative clinical trials and it is not known if one treatment strategy is superior. We undertook this retrospective study to assess the real-world clinical outcomes in patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma using the Caris Life Sciences database. Methods: Real world overall survival (rwOS) for cases of ACC was obtained from insurance claims data and Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated from the date of collection to the date of last contact. Cases were divided into subgroups based on treatment received – chemo (including platinum agents, taxanes, 5FU, topoisomerase inhibitors, anthracyclines), EGFRi (cetuximab, erlotinib, lapatinib), mTKIs (pazopanib, axitinib, sunitinib, cabozantinib, lenvatinib, sorafenib) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) (atezolizumab, ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab). Results: 368 patients (pts) were identified with ACC, 16 were locally recurrent and 216 tumors were taken from metastatic sites. 50 pts received chemo, 6 were treated with EGFRi and 15 with mTKIs. Pts who received combination EGFRi and chemo or mTKI and chemo were excluded. The median overall survival (mOS) all patients with metastatic ACC was 2.8 years (yrs). The mOS of pts with R/M ACC was 3 yrs for chemo, 2.9 yrs for EGFRi and 1.5 yrs for mTKIs. There was no significance in mOS between chemo vs mTKIs (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.3 - 2, p = 0.72) and chemo vs EGFRi (HR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.3 - 2.5, p = 0.78). We further compared the outcomes of those treated with EGFRi (n = 8) with mTKIs (n = 19) in the entire cohort. For most pts, these agents were given as front line therapy. 25% (2/8) of patients had received treatment prior to EGFRi and 20% (4/9) prior to mTKIs (p = 1). There was no significant difference in mOS with HR 0.6 (95% CI 0.16 - 2.6), p = 0.6. We also compared the mOS of patients who received ICIs (n = 22) with those who did not (n = 346) but there was no significant difference (mOS 3.19 vs 3.17 yrs respectively, HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.47- 1.61, p = 0.65). Conclusions: There was no significant difference in the mOS between pts with R/M ACC who were treated with chemo, EGFRi or TKIs and in those who received ICIs compared to those who did not in our limited patient population. This highlights the need for predictive biomarkers for better patient selection with the goal of personalizing treatment strategies for this disease.


2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (7) ◽  
pp. 1095-1101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Talia L Fuchs ◽  
Angela Chou ◽  
Loretta Sioson ◽  
Amy Sheen ◽  
Anthony J Gill

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 3153
Author(s):  
Makito Miyake ◽  
Shunta Hori ◽  
Takuya Owari ◽  
Yuki Oda ◽  
Yoshihiro Tatsumi ◽  
...  

Over the past decade, an “immunotherapy tsunami”, more specifically that involving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has overtaken the oncological field. The interaction and cross-talk among tumor cells and several immune cells in the tumor microenvironment are dynamic and complex processes. As immune contexture can vary widely across different types of primary tumors and tumor microenvironments, there is still a significant lack of clinically available definitive biomarkers to predict patient response to ICIs, especially in urogenital malignancies. An increasing body of evidence evaluating urological malignancies has proven that tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are a double-edged sword in cancer. There is an urgent need to shed light on the functional heterogeneity in the tumor-infiltrating immune system and to explore its prognostic impact following surgery and other treatments. Notably, we emphasized the difference in the immunological profile among urothelial carcinomas arising from different primary origins, the bladder, renal pelvis, and ureter. Significant differences in the density of FOXP3-positive TILs, CD204-positive tumor-infiltrating macrophages, PD-L1-positive cells, and colony-stimulating factors were observed. This review discusses two topics: (i) the prognostic impact of TILs and (ii) predictive biomarkers for ICIs, to shed light on lymphocyte migration in four solid tumors, the urothelial carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, prostate cancer, and retroperitoneal sarcoma.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS11075-TPS11075
Author(s):  
Viktor Grünwald ◽  
Sebastian Bauer ◽  
Barbara Hermes ◽  
Philipp Ivanyi ◽  
Lars H Lindner ◽  
...  

TPS11075 Background: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumors and exhibit substantial histological diversity. Efficacious targeted 1st line treatment for advanced or metastatic STS is not available, and the standard therapy has been anthracycline-based for decades. This strategy shows poor efficacy, as demonstrated by a median Overall Survival (OS) of 12-20 months. Several STS subtypes, however, have been shown to express PD-L1, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have demonstrated principle anti-tumor activity in pretreated STS. Our ongoing clinical trial tests the activity and safety of ICI combination therapy in the first-line setting. We hypothesize that the dual checkpoint blockade with Durvalumab (PD-L1) and Tremelimumab (CTLA-4) improves overall survival in STS when compared to the standard of care doxorubicin. Methods: MEDISARC is a multi-center phase II trial that is enrolling adult treatment-naïve patients with histologically confirmed STS of intermediate or high grade (FNCLCC grade 2 or 3) not amenable to surgery with curative intent and ECOG performance status 0-2. Chemosensitive histologic STS are eligible. 100 patients will be randomized 1:1, stratified by ECOG status (0 vs. 1/2). Patients in the experimental arm are treated with fixed doses of durvalumab (1.5 g Q4W) and tremelimumab (75 mg Q4W for 3 cycles, then Q12W) until Progressive Disease (PD) or for a maximum of 12 months. Doxorubicin treatment in the standard arm is at 75 mg/m2 Q3W and limited to 6 cycles. OS is the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints include 2-year OS rate, PFS, ORR according to conventional and modified RECIST 1.1, safety and tolerability and health-related quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30). OS analysis may be performed when the required number of events (E=70) has been observed. All randomized and treated subjects will be included in the efficacy and safety analysis. The accompanying translational research aims to identify prognostic and predictive biomarkers in blood and tumor tissue. Enrollment of patients started in April 2018 and is ongoing. As of February 2019, 32 patients have been enrolled. The study is sponsored by AIO-Studien-gGmbH, Berlin, Germany. Clinical trial information: 2016-004750-15.


1997 ◽  
Vol 182 (3) ◽  
pp. 318-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsi M. Ropponen ◽  
Matti J. Eskelinen ◽  
Pertti K. Lipponen ◽  
Esko Alhava ◽  
Veli-Matti Kosma

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document