scholarly journals HUKUM LINGKUNGAN EFFEKTIVITAS SANKSI PIDANA DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM LINGKUNGAN

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-148
Author(s):  
Sahat Maruli Tua Situmeang
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Environmental Crime ◽  
Environmental Laws ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Administrative Sanctions ◽  
Careful Assessment ◽  
Environmental Crimes

ABSTRACT   Application sanctions for the perpetrators of environmental crime whether committed by individuals and carried out by the corporation can be executed by means of administrative law, civil law or through criminal law. Of some sanctions in its application should be through a thorough and careful assessment in accordance with the characteristics, objectives and benefits of the application of sanctions. In this study, the authors conducted a study on the application of sanctions for perpetrators of environmental crimes, either in the form of administrative sanctions, and sanctions in the form of a court decision which is done through a civil action or criminal sanctions proposed by puitusan court investigator, so they will know particularly the effectiveness of any sanctions to be imposed criminal sanctions against the perpetrators of environmental crimes. The research method used in this research using normative juridical research method, by studying legal norms that exist that can be used as a guide for the implementation of laws that already exist. Through this study, the researcher has an opinion that the sanctions that are considered most effective to be applied to the perpetrators of environmental crime and the enforcement of environmental laws, namely by means of administrative law with the form of sanctions to freeze and / or revoke the business license of each corporation who have committed crimes environment.   Keywords: Environmental Crimes, Penalties Law, Environmental Law Enforcement   ABSTRAK   Penegakan hukum bagi para pelaku kejahatan lingkungan hidup telah diatur dalam bentuk sanksi sebagaimana yang telah dimuat dalam Undang-undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup.  Penerapakan sanksi bagi para pelaku kejahatan lingkungan hidup  baik yang dilakukan oleh perorangan maupun yang diakukan oleh korporasi dapat dijalankan melalui sarana hukum adminstrasi, hukum perdata maupun melalui hukum pidana. Dari beberapa sanksi yang telah diatur dalam Undang-undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 tersebut dalam penerapannya haruslah melalui suatu kajian secara seksama dan cermat sesuai dengan karakteristik, tujuan dan manfaat dari penerapan sanksi tersebut. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui efektifitas dari suatu sanksi, terlebih sanksi pidana yang akan dijatuhkan terhadap para pelaku kejahatan lingkungan hidup melalui metode penelitian yuridis normatif,  yaitu dengan mempelajari norma-norma hukum yang ada yang dapat digunakan sebagai suatu  panduan untuk terlaksananya undang-undang yang telah ada. Melalui penelitian ini, peneliti  memiliki suatu pendapat bahwa penerapan sanksi yang dianggap paling effektif  untuk diterapkan bagi para pelaku kejahatan lingkungan hidup dan dalam rangka penegakan hukum lingkungan yaitu melalui sarana hukum administrasi dengan bentuk sanksi membekukan dan/atau mencabut ijin usaha setiap korporasi yang melakukan kejahatan lingkungan. Kata kunci : Kejahatan Lingkungan Hidup, Sanksi Hukum, Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan

scholarly journals ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTION IN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 22-37
Author(s):  
H. Bachrul Amiq
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Environmental Pollution ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Environmental Laws ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Public ◽  
Administrative Sanction ◽  
Administrative Sanctions ◽  
Better Than

Enforcement of administrative sanctions is part of the enforcement of administrative environmental laws. Law enforcement of the administrative environment itself can be done in a preventive and repressive manner. Administrative law enforcement that is preventive is done through supervision, while repressive law enforcement is done through the application of administrative sanctions. Supervision and application of administrative sanctions aims to achieve the adherence of the public to the legal norms of the administrative environment. Good supervision as part of preventive environmental law enforcement will prevent the violation of administrative law norms. Thus, environmental pollution resulting from such breaches can be avoided. This is better than the enforcement of repressive administrative sanctions after the offense. However, it does not mean that the review of enforcement of administrative sanctions is unimportant.

scholarly journals PENGATURAN TINDAK PIDANA DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 32 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN DAN PENGELOLAAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP (Tinjauan Fiqh Al- Bi’ah)

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 173
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ridwansyah
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Protection ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Environmental Governance ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government

The setting of environmental law in Indonesia has started to improve since the Law Number 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management contains criminal act for every person who violates the provisions. It is stated in Article 98, 99, 100. This research method is a library or literature research which is conducted to gather secondary data in the field of environmental law and fiqh al-bi’ah. This research is normative law research while the nature of this research is descriptive analysis. It aimed to give a systematic illustration on legal norms that was found in law number 32 of 2009 and environmental fiqh accurately and the criminal sanctions review used in both arrangements. In this study there were two questions first, how is the arrangement of criminal act in Law No. 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection Management. The second is whether the concept of fiqh al bi’ah is in line with Law No. 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection Management. The result from this study is that the criminal act contained in the Law No. 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection Management has not been enough to trap the environmental destroyer so that the government is expected to revise the unsuitable articles. Furthermore, the result of this research shows the similarity concept between fiqh al bi’ah and environmental governance in Indonesia. The concept offered by fiqh al bi’ah is a part of maqashidul syari’ah where Islam strongly recommended to maintain the environment. Keywords: environment, Fiqh Al-Bi’ah, Maqashidul Syari’ah

scholarly journals Penormaan dan Pelaksanaan Kewajiban Ingkar Notaris

2020 ◽  
pp. 113-138
Author(s):  
Qonitah Annur Aziza ◽  
Aprilia Trisanti ◽  
Kiki Aristyanti
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Limit Set ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Existing Problems ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Administrative Sanctions

The notary is obliged to keep all legal deeds outlined in the contents of the deed and all information given to the notary in making the deed. the appointment of a notary as a witness in a case causes the violation of this obligation to be violated a lot. Strong legal protection is needed from the Honorary Board of Notaries (MKN) so that investigators and prosecutors are not arbitrary. The formulation of the problem taken by the author is the normalization of notary liability based on UUJN. And the application of sanctions from the notary obligation in the community.The writing of this thesis uses a normative juridical research method, namely by reviewing the legal norms contained in legislation, legal theories and jurisprudence related to the issues discussed. This research approach uses a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The purpose of this study is to explain more deeply about the norms of denial obligations in the UUJN and their application in the community with the existence of permission from MKN. Based on the results of the study, the author obtained answers to existing problems, namely the notary has a broken obligation that must be obeyed and regulated in Article 4 paragraph (2) and Article 16 paragraph (1) letter f UUJN-P. This breach obligation has a limit set out in UUJN in Article 66 paragraph (1) concerning a notary appointed as a witness can talk about the deed with the approval of the permit from MKN. But it also needs to be known if the broken obligation is violated without permission, the notary may be subject to administrative sanctions in the form of termination of employment, civil sanctions in the form of compensation and criminal sanctions in the form of prison sentences.

scholarly journals PENEGAKAN HUKUM DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENCEMARAN LINGKUNGAN (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 55/Pid.B/LH/2016/PN.Pwk)

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Indrianita Melissa Purnamasari
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Pollution ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
Environmental Crime ◽  
Corporate Management ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Case Number ◽  
Environmental Crimes ◽  
Laws And Regulations

AbstrakArtikel ini membahas mengenai pengaturan pertanggungjawaban pidana pengurus korporasi dalam kejahatan lingkungan serta bagaimana penegakan hukum lingungan hidup dalam tindak pidana pencemaran lingkungan  Adapun dalam penelitian ini akan menggunakan sebuah kasus dengan nomor perkara  55/Pid.B/LH/2016/PN.Pwk sebagai acuan. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian normative yuridis dengan bentuk preskriptif, yang melakukan identifikasi pokok-pokok permasalahan yang hendak dibahas secara tuntas dengan norma hukum yang terdapat dalam peraturan perundang-undangan terkait. Hasil penelitian ini menemukan bahwa pengurus dalam kasus lingkungkan hidup dapat  dimintakan pertanggungjawaban pidana karena sebagai pihak yang menjalankan perusahaan yang melakukan tindak pidana lingkungan hidup. Namun banyak dari penegakan kasus tindak pidana lingkungan hidup justru tidak meminta pertanggungjawaban korporasi sehingga memungkinkan korporasi yang sama melakukan tindak pidana lingkungan hidup. AbstractThis article discusses the regulation of criminal responsibility for corporate management in environmental crimes and how to enforce the environmental law in criminal acts of environmental pollution. In this study, we will use a case with case number 55 / Pid.B / LH / 2016 / PN.Pwk as a reference. This research is a juridical normative research in a prescriptive form, which identifies the main issues to be discussed thoroughly with the legal norms contained in the relevant laws and regulations. The results of this study found that management in environmental cases can be held responsible for the crime because they are the party who runs the company who has committed an environmental crime. However, many cases of environmental crime do not hold corporations accountable, allowing the same corporations to commit environmental crimes. 

Unearthing Under-Governed Territory

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Stoett
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
International Organizations ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
Environmental Crime ◽  
International Environmental Law ◽  
Mitigating Factor ◽  
Environmental Crimes

This chapter looks at whether and how international organizations and criminal law can help us deal effectively with transnational environmental crimes and, more broadly, with environmental insecurity and injustice. It explores the question of whether the climate change justice agenda can benefit from the expanded pursuit of transnational environmental crime. The chapter asks whether international environmental law, refurbished, act as a mitigating factor in climate change. It concludes that while current international legal instruments can help spur additional action, by themselves, they will prove inadequate. Consequently, one idea proposed is a new international environmental court to deter all forms of ecocide.

scholarly journals Aspek Hukum dalam Penyelenggaraan Bisnis Perhotelan

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 1033
Author(s):  
Hernawati RAS ◽  
Dani Durahman
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
National Development ◽  
Environmental Issues ◽  
Law Reform ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Consumer Rights ◽  
Hospitality Business ◽  
Administrative Sanctions

The development of the law as part of a national development known as law reform is carried out thoroughly and integratedly. The hospitality business is growing rapidly as the economy develops, within the restrictions on the scope of the Hotel's business, there is a legal device that regulates the permit and protection of consumers. Hospitality businesses that do not have amdal permits Environmental law enforcement can be done by sanctioning administrative sanctions. Administrative sanctions, settlement of environmental issues outside the court and even criminal sanctions have been stipulated in Law No. 32 of 2009. The aspect of protection to Hospitality Consumers must be in accordance with the provisions of Law No. 8 of 1999, hospitality business must provide legal certainty in providing protection to consumers where currently there are still many hotels that do not provide information about consumer rights and obligations and the development of social responsibility (social responsebility). 

scholarly journals Penyelenggaraan Pariwisata Olahraga: Perspektif Rekomendasi Pemerintah Daerah

Acta Comitas ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 213
Author(s):  
Aditya Putra Thama ◽  
Ni Ketut Supasti Dharmawan
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
The People ◽  
Sports Tourism ◽  
Administrative Sanctions ◽  
Sports Activities

Current sports activities are quite closely related to tourism. Tourism is the main source of livelihood for the people of Bali. Along with the development of sports in Bali, the implementation of sports tourism was also developed as an option in the development of local tourism. Bali Provincial Sports Regulation regulates sports tourism in Bali. However, the provisions of Article 14 paragraph (2) of the regulation require regional government recommendations prior to the implementation of sports tourism, which if not fulfilled can be subject to criminal sanctions in contravention of the SKN Law and the implementing regulations give rise to norm conflicts. The purpose of this study is to study the implementation of sports tourism based on the Bali Province Sports Regulations and analyze criminal sanctions for not being given the recommendations of the regional government by the organizers. The method used in this study is a normative legal research method with a statutory approach. The results of the study show that based on the Bali Provincial Sports Regulations the implementation of sports tourism must obtain recommendations from the regional government as Article 14 paragraph (2) of the Provincial Regulation on Sport in Bali. However, higher legal provisions related to sports, namely the SKN Law does not regulate this. The SKN Law which is a reference for organizing sports only requires a recommendation from the relevant organization of sports branch as Article 51 paragraph (2). The criminal provisions as Article 65 paragraph (1) of the Bali Province Sports Regulations for organizers who do not have a recommendation from the regional government are irrelevant and seem excessive considering the recommendation is an administrative requirement for an activity, it will be more relevant if administrative sanctions are imposed rather than criminal sanctions. In the event that this occurs, it will refer to the provisions of the SKN Law as well as the implementation rules. Kegiatan olahraga saat ini cukup erat kaitannya dengan pariwisata. Pariwisata merupakan sumber mata pencaharian utama bagi masyarakat Bali. Seiring dengan berkembangnya olahraga di Bali, penyelenggaraan pariwisata olahraga juga dikembangkan sebagai salah satu pilihan dalam pengembangan pariwisata lokal. Perda Keolahragaan Provinsi Bali mengatur pariwisata olahraga di Bali. Namun ketentuan Pasal 14 ayat (2) pada perda tersebut yang mewajibkan rekomendasi pemerintah daerah sebelum penyelenggaraan pariwisata olahraga, yang apabila tidak dipenuhi dapat dikenakan sanksi pidana bertentangan dengan UU SKN maupun peraturan pelaksanaannya memunculkan konflik norma. Tujuan studi ini yakni untuk mengkaji penyelenggaraan pariwisata olahraga berdasarkan Perda Keolahragaan Provinsi Bali dan menganalisis sanksi pidana atas tidak dikantonginya rekomendasi pemerintah daerah oleh penyelenggara. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa berdasarkan Perda Keolahragaan Provinsi Bali penyelenggaraan pariwisata olahraga wajib mendapatkan rekomendasi dari pemerintah daerah sebagaimana Pasal 14 ayat (2) Perda Keolahragaan Provinsi Bali. Namun ketentuan perundang-undangan yang lebih tinggi terkait dengan keolahragaan, yakni UU SKN tidak mengatur demikian. UU SKN yang merupakan acuan dari penyelenggaraan keolahragaan hanya mewajibkan adanya rekomendasi dari induk cabang olahraga yang bersangkutan sebagaimana Pasal 51 ayat (2). Adapun ketentuan pidana sebagaimana Pasal 65 ayat (1) Perda Keolahragaan Provinsi Bali bagi penyelenggara yang tidak mengantongi rekomendasi dari pemerintah daerah tidaklah relevan dan terkesan berlebihan mengingat rekomendasi adalah sebuah syarat administrasi dari sebuah penyelenggaraan kegiatan, maka akan lebih relevan jika dikenakan sanksi administratif daripada sanksi pidana. Dalam hal itu terjadi, maka akan mengacu pada ketentuan UU SKN maupun aturan pelaksanaannya.

scholarly journals IMPLIKASI POLITIK KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PIDANA DALAM UUPLH

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 147
Author(s):  
David Aprizon Putra
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Management ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Political Elites ◽  
Political Choice ◽  
Environmental Laws ◽  
Set Up

Political Law is one of the discourses that control the existence of law.One of the realm of law that has recently received the spotlight and serious attention. Particularly related to the legal political option is the environment law that increasingly strong day include criminal law enforcement in law enforcement. There are some weak things that then have negative implications, against the enforcement of environmental laws related to the lack of cautious political choice. Since 1982 in Law No. 4 of 1982 on the Principles of Environmental Management which was changed in 1997 into Law No. 27 of 1997 on Environmental Management, the legal politics of criminal law policy has been conducted, that the criminal law policy in the realm of the environment is already a choice of legal politics in the realm of environmental law. Law Number 32 Year 2009 About PPLH as the latest generation, adds Chapter XV of the Criminal Code in its charge of 23 Articles. Law Number 32 Year 2009 contains a much more complete criminal provision than Law Number 23 Year 1997. Although there is still much to be fixed on the provisions of Law Number 32 Year 2009. Base on research shows that there are special procedural laws that regulate formal law enforcement. It is based on the principle of ultimum remedium which means that the implementation of the criminal law must wait until the effectiveness of administrative law is upheld. To minimize obstacles in enforcing environmental laws which are sometimes used by political elites to seek profit, formal laws against environmental crimes should be set up specifically with the Act.

Time for a Protocol on Transnational Environmental Crime?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory L. Rose
Keyword(s):  
20Th Century ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
Transnational Crime ◽  
Organised Crime ◽  
Environmental Crime ◽  
Environmental Treaties ◽  
International Harmonisation ◽  
Voluntary Guidelines ◽  
Environmental Crimes

Environmental law became global through the adoption of environmental treaties in the last quarter decade of the 20th century. Similarly, globalisation of criminal law accelerated when the Convention on Transnational Organised Crime 2000 (CTOC) deepened international legal cooperation between States to combat transnational crime. A protocol to the CTOC, complemented by voluntary guidelines and model legislation, could promote international harmonisation of laws against environmental crimes. This article argues that the time is right to bring together certain elements of international environmental and transnational criminal law.

scholarly journals Criminal Sanctions against Taxpayer Who are Negligent to Register Land and Building Taxes

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-78
Author(s):  
Made Putri Pradnya Parahita ◽  
Simon Nahak ◽  
I Ketut Widia
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Common Problems ◽  
Administrative Sanctions

One of the most common problems related to land and building tax is where there are citizens who are aware of their obligation to pay taxes by registering their objects, but due to certain circumstances, the taxpayer does not register the tax object he owns. This study aims to find out the regulation of criminal sanctions against taxpayers who do not register land and building tax and to find out the criminal liability of taxpayers who do not register the object of land and building tax. This study uses normative research that starts with an indication of the obscurity of legal norms. The results of this study showed that the provision of sanctions is needed as a form of the last effort to realize the certainty of tax activities going well. Sanctions given can be in the form of administrative sanctions in the form of fines to criminal sanctions in the form of prison or confinement, which can be imposed on taxpayers and related officials. Criminal liability in the field of taxation arises when each taxpayer is indicated to have committed a tax crime. The intended taxpayer is an individual taxpayer or legal entity or corporation. Likewise, it has been regulated that starting from the taxpayer, tax officials/employees, to third parties have their respective criminal liabilities. The legal basis is Law Number 28 of 2007 concerning General Provisions and Tax Procedures. The advice given is the need for strict rules regarding criminal sanctions against land and building tax registration.  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document