Faculty Opinions recommendation of Making the first fracture the last fracture: ASBMR task force report on secondary fracture prevention.

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Task Force ◽  
Fracture Prevention ◽  
Secondary Fracture ◽  
Task Force Report ◽  
Secondary Fracture Prevention

Making the first fracture the last fracture: ASBMR task force report on secondary fracture prevention

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 2039-2046 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A Eisman ◽  
Earl R Bogoch ◽  
Rick Dell ◽  
J Timothy Harrington ◽  
Ross E McKinney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Task Force ◽  
Fracture Prevention ◽  
Secondary Fracture ◽  
Task Force Report ◽  
Secondary Fracture Prevention

scholarly journals Clinical Guideline Highlights for the Hospitalist: Secondary Fracture Prevention for Hospitalized Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-101
Author(s):  
Evan Siau ◽  
Matthew Harrington ◽  
Daniel Steinberg ◽  
Alfred Burger
Keyword(s):  
Technology Policy ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Hospital Medicine ◽  
Fracture Prevention ◽  
Target Population ◽  
Mineral Research ◽  
Secondary Fracture ◽  
Secondary Fracture Prevention ◽  
American Society ◽  
Policy Target

GUIDELINE TITLE: Secondary Fracture Prevention: Consensus Clinical Recommendations from a Multistakeholder Coalition RELEASE DATE: September 20, 2019 PRIOR VERSION: Not applicable DEVELOPER: American Society for Bone and Mineral Research Task Force and Multistakeholder Coalition FUNDING SOURCE: American Society for Bone and Mineral Research and the Center for Medical Technology Policy TARGET POPULATION: Adults 65 years or older with a hip or vertebral fracture. This review will focus on the core recommendations and their application in the practice of hospital medicine.

scholarly journals Low-Energy Pelvic Ring Fractures: A Care Conundrum

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 215145932098540
Author(s):  
Bailey R. Abernathy ◽  
Lisa K. Schroder ◽  
Deborah C. Bohn ◽  
Julie A. Switzer
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
Patient Population ◽  
Pelvic Ring ◽  
Fracture Prevention ◽  
Low Energy ◽  
Care Pathways ◽  
Secondary Fracture ◽  
Secondary Fracture Prevention ◽  
Pelvic Ring Fractures ◽  
Rehabilitative Care

Introduction: A need exists for improved care pathways for patients experiencing low-energy pelvic ring fractures. A review of the current literature was performed to understand the typical patient care and post-acute rehabilitation pathway within the US healthcare system. We also sought to summarize reported clinical outcomes worldwide. Significance: Low-energy pelvic ring fracture patients usually do not qualify for inpatient admission, yet they often require post-acute rehabilitative care. The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ (CMS) 3-day rule is a barrier to obtaining financial coverage of this rehabilitative care. Results: Direct admission of some patients to post-acute care facilities has shown promise with decreased cost, improved patient outcomes, and increased patient satisfaction. Secondary fracture prevention programs may also improve outcomes for this patient population. Conclusions: Post-acute care innovation and secondary fracture prevention should be prioritized in the low-energy pelvic fragility fracture patient population. To demonstrate the effect and feasibility of these improved care pathways, further studies are necessary.

scholarly journals Secondary Fracture Prevention

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 145-161
Author(s):  
Robert B. Conley ◽  
Gemma Adib ◽  
Robert A. Adler ◽  
Kristina E. Åkesson ◽  
Ivy M. Alexander ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Prevention ◽  
Secondary Fracture ◽  
Secondary Fracture Prevention

scholarly journals PAO22 REFILL ADHERENCE IN OSTEOPOROTIC WOMEN WITH PRIMARY AND SECONDARY FRACTURE PREVENTION

2002 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-186
Author(s):  
CD Beilfuss ◽  
MJ Wall ◽  
JS Graff ◽  
CR McBurney ◽  
AM Fendrick
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Prevention ◽  
Secondary Fracture ◽  
Secondary Fracture Prevention ◽  
Refill Adherence

scholarly journals Early benefits of a secondary fracture prevention programme

2021 ◽  
pp. 112070002110274
Author(s):  
Gershon Zinger ◽  
Noa Sylvetsky ◽  
Yedin Levy ◽  
Kobi Steinberg ◽  
Alexander Bregman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Fracture Risk ◽  
Fragility Fracture ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Fracture Prevention ◽  
Intervention Programme ◽  
Secondary Fracture ◽  
Secondary Fracture Prevention ◽  
Randomised Study ◽  
Dexa Scan

Introduction: The most successful programme for secondary fracture prevention is the FLS (fracture liaison service) model. Our orthopaedic department carried out a prospective randomised study to measure the effectiveness of a 4-step intervention programme. The findings in this study reveal important additional clinical benefits to having an orthopaedic-based FLS programme and evaluates the usefulness of fracture risk tools. Methods: We carried out a prospective study to evaluate patients with a fragility fracture of the hip. There were 2 groups, intervention and control (each 100 patients). Of these, 20 were either removed from the study or dropped out, leaving 180 for analysis. In addition to routine preoperative blood tests, albumin and thyroid function levels were obtained and PTH (parathyroid hormone) levels when indicated. The intervention group (83 patients) had a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan performed and fracture risk (FRAX) was calculated. Results: 12 patients (6.7%) had blood results which showed a potentially treatable cause for osteoporosis and 36 (20%) had blood results that changed their medical care. FRAX scores (180 patients) showed that the major osteoporotic fracture score correctly predicted the hip fracture in only 49%. The hip fracture score correctly predicted the hip fracture in 83%. DEXA scores (65 patients) showed osteoporosis in only 46% of hips and in only 26% of spines. An abnormal FRAX score or DEXA scan would have predicted a fragility fracture 93% of the time. Conclusions: In addition to reducing secondary fractures, FLS programmes can provide fundamental benefits to the health of the patient. The intervention programme in this study identified patients with underlying treatable causes, correctable clinical conditions and patients with an unusually low bone density. When used together, FRAX and DEXA are more sensitive predictors for hip fracture risk than either are individually. Trial registry: 201497CTIL ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02239523 )

Therapeutic Approaches to Secondary Fracture Prevention in High Risk Populations

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. e104-e114
Author(s):  
Huei-Wen Lim ◽  
Melissa Chamblain ◽  
Benny Wong ◽  
Siddharth Raghavan
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Fracture Prevention ◽  
Therapeutic Approaches ◽  
Secondary Fracture ◽  
Secondary Fracture Prevention ◽  
High Risk Populations
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document