Avrasya ekonomi birliği (AEB) Ve Tek Kuşak Tek Yol (TKTY) projelerinin karşilaştirmali analizi

2019 ◽  
pp. 80-82
Author(s):  
Moldir ISAHANOVA
Keyword(s):  
Central Asia ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Economic Indicators ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
One Belt One Road ◽  
The World ◽  
Road Projects ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Economic Union ◽  
The One

Özet: Rusya Federasyonu Avrasya alanında büyük bir devlettir. Çin ise dünyada en güçlü ekonomi göstergelere sahiptir. "Avrasya Ekonomik Birlik" ve "Tek Kuşak Tek Yol" (bundan sonra AEB, TKTY) projelerinin ilan edildiği günden beri uzmanlar arasında yoğun bir şekilde incelenmektedir. Bu iki proje iki büyük devlet tarafından sunulan gün- cel projelerindendir. Dahası bu iki projenin birleştirilmesi yüzerinde çalışmalar da hız kazanmaktadır. Bu makalede iki projenin güçlü ve zayıf yönleri değerlendirilerek ikisinin birleşip birleşemeyeceğini incelenecektir. Ayrıca bu konu ile ilgili çalışmaları incelenip, belli bir sonuç çıkarılmaktadır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Avrasya Ekonomik Birlik, Tek Kuşak Tek Yol, Çin, Rusya, Enteg- rasyon, Kırgızstan, Kazakistan, Orta Asya, Nurly Jol Projesi, Avrasya. Abstract: The Russian Federation is a large state in the Eurasian area. China has the strongest economic indicators in the world. Since, proclamation of the "Eurasian Economic Union" and the "One Belt One Road" projects have been intensively studied among experts. These two projects are current projects presented by two major states. Moreover, the number of works about combining these two projects is also increasing. In this article, the strengths and weaknesses of the two projects will be evaluated and whether the two will merge together will be examined. In addition, studies on this subject are examined and a certain conclusion will be drawn. Keywords: EEU, OBOR, SREB, Russia, China, Central Asia, Integration, Eurasian, Nurly Zhol, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan.

scholarly journals Russia in the Greater Eurasian Partnership: from Civilization Theory to Political Practice

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 33-42
Author(s):  
T. N. Litvinova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
New World ◽  
Shanghai Cooperation Organization ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
One Belt One Road ◽  
Economic Statistics ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Economic Union ◽  
Vladimir Putin

Introduction. The article overviews the place of Russia in the promotion and construction of the Greater Eurasian partnership. The idea of this partnership was proposed by President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin for the interfacing of the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU) and the Chinese transport initiative “One Belt, One Road” (OBOR).Materials and methods. The study is based on the synthesis of the civilizational concept of Eurasianism and the theory of international integration. The work analyses official documents of EEU and Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), declarations of their officials, screening mass media, trade and economic statistics.Results. The statistics show that EEU is gaining success, although at present its developed is slowing. Third countries still play a significant role in foreign trade and investments of EEU member states. China competes with Russia for the dominance in Central Asia. The interface of EEU and SCO integration processes, as well as the Chinese initiative “One Belt, One Road” should be developed in view of Russia’s interests.Discussion and conclusion. The Greater Eurasian partnership can be considered as component of a new world architecture underlied by the system of regional and interregional economic and integration groups. The post-Soviet countries of Eurasia are united by a common history, civilizational and cultural prerequisites for integration with the unifying role of Russia. No serious project on the continent can be implemented without its participation.

scholarly journals Regime for the Movement of Cultural Property in the EAEU

2020 ◽  
pp. 250-260
Author(s):  
Irina V. Mikheeva ◽  
◽  
Anastasia S. Loginova ◽  
Natalya V. Рronina ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Values ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Cultural Property ◽  
International Standards ◽  
Advisory Opinion ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Analysis And Synthesis ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Economic Union ◽  
The One

The article discusses the peculiarities of moving cultural values across customs borders of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). The introduction of restrictive regimes for the export and import of cultural values is determined, on the one hand, by the desire of states to activate integration processes for the development of economic, social, and cultural interaction, and, on the other hand, by the aim to preserve their cultural heritage. The aim of the study is to identify comparative characteristics of national regimes of moving cultural property and determine their correlation with similar supranational rules. The article includes an analysis of the EAEU member states’ “cultural” legislation (Russia, Belarus, Kyrgyzstan, Armenia, and Kazakhstan) and the EAEU intergovernmental acts such as the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union with Annexes. The authors also review the judicial practice of Russian courts, the advisory opinion of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union and decisions of the Eurasian Economic Commission. The methodological basis of the article consists of genetic and structural-functional approaches; analysis and synthesis; special formal legal and comparative legal methods. The analysis of supranational regulation of moving cultural values allows drawing attention to the ambiguity of the EAEU law connected with the subjects that introduce the restrictions of moving certain goods, including cultural values, in the territory of the Union. It is against this background that the increasing importance of the systemic correlation of national restrictive norms is shown. Meanwhile, there are differences in the temporal aspects of the regimes (the period for obtaining an export license is from several days to several months; there are different deadlines for temporary export and examination), in procedural requirements (provision of cultural values for inspection could be obligatory or necessary only under certain conditions), in financial support (payment for carrying out the necessary procedures for the export of cultural values such as examination, for example), etc. The authors note that the content of the permissive regimes for moving cultural values across national borders is disjointed. In the context of the ambiguity of supranational legislation, it is expedient to make a judgment about the prematurity of introducing rules on the priority of the EAEU law regarding the procedure for the export and import of cultural values across the Russian state border into the legislation of the Russian Federation. This judgment is supported by amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation on the conditions for the application of international standards in the territory of Russia. In this regard, an algorithm for minimizing regulatory diversity in the movement of cultural values within the EAEU is proposed.

scholarly journals Problems of the preliminary customs informing system and the introduction of the Single Window at the sea check points of the Russian Federation

2018 ◽  
Vol 239 ◽  
pp. 04004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Svetlana Maydanova ◽  
Igor Ilin
Keyword(s):  
Developing Countries ◽  
International Trade ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
International Organizations ◽  
International Standards ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Check Points ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Economic Union ◽  
National Governments

The Single Window concept in the international trade and logistics has been explored by international organizations and national governments over the last two decades. International standards and recommendations, government decisions on this approach are widespread today in both developed and developing countries. Similar decisions and legal acts were implemented during the last ten years by the Russian Federation, as a member of the Eurasian Economic Union. This article provides overview of the following coherent stage – the implementation of preliminary customs informing system at sea check points of the RF with concerns of the Single Window introduction.

LEGAL REGULATION OF CRYPTOCURRENCY MINING

2020 ◽  
pp. 13-20
Author(s):  
Pavel Samolysov ◽  
◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
State Regulation ◽  
Entrepreneurial Activity ◽  
Mining Equipment ◽  
Social Phenomena ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Economic Union

Purpose and objectives: analysis of legal regulation of cryptocurrency mining in the Russian Federation and abroad, identification of problems and gaps in this area and development of proposals aimed at their resolution. Scientific significance: the article reveals the current state and established doctrinal approaches to the legal regulation of cryptocurrency mining in Russia. For the first time, the necessity of strengthening and developing state regulation of mining is substantiated. The main attention in the article is paid to the system of legal regulation of the process of creating cryptocurrencies in the territory of the Russian Federation, taking into account the law of the Eurasian Economic Union. Methods: a dialectical approach to the cognition of social phenomena, allowing them to be analyzed in their historical development and functioning in the context of a set of objective and subjective factors, which determined the choice of the following research methods: formal logical, comparative legal, sociological, which allowed the author to ensure the reliability and validity of the conclusions. Key findings: The legal vacuum in the regulation of mining acts as a serious inhibiting factor at the current stage of its improvement and often itself becomes an offense. At the same time, cryptocurrency mining is one of the new types of entrepreneurial activity, in connection with which in the near future it is necessary to introduce state regulation of cryptocurrency mining in the Russian Federation, for which it is necessary: to develop a law regulating the organization and implementation of the production of cryptocurrencies using cryptographic algorithms; to supplement the classifier of the main type of carried out economic activity with a new type of activity — mining; to create a unified electronic register of crypto farms operating on the territory of the Russian Federation; supplement the existing legislation of the Russian Federation and the Eurasian Economic Union with the norms regulating the import of mining equipment. Thus, the important results of the study are: the development of the problems posed, which for a long time remained outside the attention of specialists, as well as the significant novelty of the factual material introduced into circulation.

scholarly journals About the need to improve the requirements to labeling of food products in the Russian Federation and the Eurasian Economic Union

2019 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 192-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. K. Baturin ◽  
O. V. Arnautov ◽  
Olga V. Bagryantseva ◽  
S. A. Khotimchenko ◽  
G. N. Shatrov
Keyword(s):  
Fatty Acids ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Nutritional Value ◽  
Food Products ◽  
International Standards ◽  
Chloride Salt ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Economic Union

One of the major factors contributing to a healthy diet, proper selection of food consumers is the labeling of food products. In order to improve the requirements to labeling offood products in the Russian Federation and the Eurasian Economic Union and their harmonization with international standards and requirements of the European Union in the Technical regulations of the Customs Union "Food products are part of its labeling" (TR CU 022/2011) it should be amended as follows: 1. The list of indices of the nutritional value offood products referred to in their labeling, should be expanded by next positions: the amount of saturated fatty acids and trans fatty acids; carbohydrates, including mono- and disaccharides and the amount of added sugar; polyols; dietary fiber; added sodium chloride (salt). 2. To carry out the calculation of daily requirements of essential nutrients based on the human consumption of 2000 kcal per day, instead of 2500 kcal. 3. When setting the nutritional value offood products to envisage the application of the "color codes" indicating normal level of consumption by green, permissible - yellow, dangerously - in red. 4. In the text of the regulations Appendix, regulating the use in label offood to include information about the expected positive effects on the human body of the incoming (s) of the food product (s) ingredient (s) in case of systematic use of such a product in food rations.

Distinctive Features of the Object of Smuggling of Strategically Important Goods and Resources

2021 ◽  
pp. 225-230
Author(s):  
Vladislava K. Zaigraeva ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Public Security ◽  
International Treaties ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Economic Sphere ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Economic Union

The aim of the study is to consider issues related to the definition of public danger and the object of smuggling of strategically important goods and resources as a crime under Article 226.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, as well as the positions of individual researchers on these issues. The methodological basis of the research was formed by the general scientific theory of knowledge; the method of comparative analysis and the logical-legal method of cognition were also used. The latter was used for a more accurate understanding of the norms of Russian criminal legislation, their analysis, as well as for the interpretation of the main provisions reflected in the legal literature. As a result, the author questions the correctness of the placement of the smuggling of strategically important goods and resources in Chapter 24, Crimes Against Public Security, of Section IX, Crimes Against Public Security and Public Order: in cases of smuggling of strategically important goods and resources, the procedure for movement established in the international treaties and legislation of the Russian Federation always suffers directly, while, taking into account the possibility of further distribution of smuggled objects in the event of an untimely suppression of these objects' illegal movement, public security is only endangered but does not suffer directly. The legislator establishes the qualification of smuggling of strategically important goods and resources in large volumes as exceeding one million rubles, which confirms that the public danger of this crime is determined by economic indicators. The author proves that smuggling of strategically important goods and resources harms public relations in the economic sphere rather than public relations that ensure public security. The conclusion is formulated that the totality of social relations that ensure the normal functioning and development of the economy should be considered as the main generic object of this crime. The direct object of smuggling of strategically important goods and resources is the procedure established by the international treaties and legislation of the Russian Federation for moving strategically important goods and resources through the customs border of the Eurasian Economic Union or the state border of the Russian Federation with the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union. Criminal liability for smuggling of strategically important goods and resources is proposed to be provided for in a separate article, which should be placed in Section VIII, Crimes in the Economic Sphere, of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.

Integration in post-Soviet Central Asia

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan Zuenko
Keyword(s):  
International Relations ◽  
East Asia ◽  
Central Asia ◽  
Political Ties ◽  
Active Search ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
One Belt One Road ◽  
Economic Union ◽  
Soviet Central Asia

The 2010s became the time of active search for new forms of integration in the wide Eurasian space between Europe and East Asia. The most well-known is China’s One Belt One Road (OBOR) initiative and the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). A 7000-kilometre border between China and the EAEU was formed in 2015, which became a crucial factor in the cooperation of China and Post-Soviet Central Asia. Many regard the EAEU as just a Moscow geopolitical project and underestimated its real impacts on economic and political ties in Eurasia, particularly in post-Soviet Central Asia. This chapter examines the EAEU as a factor of international relations in the global discussion about the OBOR initiative.

scholarly journals The Identity of the Russian Federation in the Framework of the Presidential Addresses to the Federal Assembly

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 63-69
Author(s):  
V. G. Tikhonov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Historical Development ◽  
Special Relationship ◽  
General Process ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Personal Nature ◽  
Subjective Factor ◽  
Russian President ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Economic Union

The article is based on content and discourse analysis of the addresses of the President of the Russian Federation to the Federal Assembly dated 12/01/2016, 03/01/2018, 02/20/2019, 01/15/2020. The aim of research is to analyze the concept of identity in the framework of Presidential Addresses and changes in the concepts of identity in dynamics. The general tendencies of considering the term “identity” in the framework of determining the identity of the Russian Federation are derived. The special relationship between the identity of the Russian Federation and the integration of the Russian Federation into integration spaces is considered. The Vladimir Putin’s statements regarding the integration of the Russian Federation into the Eurasian Economic Union are evaluated, since the Russian Federation identity, in the opinion of the President, is inextricably linked with the formation of the “Eurasian identity of the Russian Federation”, which in turn determines the direct relationship between the identity of the Russian Federation and the integration of the Russian Federation into the Eurasian Economic Union. The article defines the subjective factor of the Russian President, which reflects the personal nature of the President’s orders and proposals. The dynamics of changes in the formation of the Russian Federation identity is reflected according to the addresses of the President of the Russian Federation to the Federal Assembly, and also on the basis of the dynamics of changes in the identity of the Russian Federation, the general process orientation of developing the Russian Federation identity is reflected. The article characterizes the permanent nature of the formation of the identity of Russia. Now, the identity of Russia is perceived as a special construct that reflects the special position of the Russian Federation, both in historical development and in the international arena.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document