scholarly journals VALIDATION OF STANDARDIZED INSTRUMENTS IN EVALUATING SPEECH-LANGUAGE DISORDERS: A CHALLENGE FOR CROSS-CULTURAL SETTINGS

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 3
Author(s):  
Zahra Ibrahim
Keyword(s):  
Language Impairment ◽  
Functional Performance ◽  
Language Skills ◽  
Receptive Language ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Typically Developing ◽  
Speech Language Pathologist ◽  
Mental Age ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Primary Assessment

Communication has a meaningful impact between clinician and client in order to comprehend each other's language for effective therapeutic recovery and health related outcomes1.Standardized tests are considered as one of the primary assessment tools used by a speech language pathologist to evaluate and diagnose child language impairment. Test is administered upon the child where functional performance and scores reveals either the typically developing language skills or if an in-depth evaluation is required in any of the language domains3. Making use of the data and analyzing the child's expressive/receptive language skills that lags behind when compared to norm referenced data; if the child is par their chronological age or below their mental age.

Communication Disorders: Language Impairments

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Dollaghan
Keyword(s):  
Language Impairment ◽  
Language Skills ◽  
Communication Disorders ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Receptive Language ◽  
Conclusive Evidence ◽  
Multisource Assessment ◽  
Speech Language Pathologist ◽  
Neurodevelopmental Abnormalities

A variety of communication disorders, including problems in hearing, speech, and language, can interfere with a child’s ability to understand and be understood by other people. Communication disorders sometime co-occur with other physical and neurodevelopmental abnormalities, but often their causes are unknown. The most prevalent of the idiopathic communication disorders is child language impairment (LI). LI is defined by significant deficits in understanding (receptive skills) or generating (expressive skills) meaningful linguistic content; it affects 5–8% of children. Best evidence on identifying LI supports a comprehensive multimethod and multisource assessment by a certified speech–language pathologist. With respect to intervention, evidence strongly favors treated over untreated children for expressive language goals; less conclusive evidence is available concerning treatment for receptive language skills. Despite increases in the evidence base, additional population-based and longitudinal investigations are needed concerning the accuracy of predictions and clinical decisions for children with LI.

Caregiver Implementation of a Home-Based Reading Program With Their Children With Disabilities: Patterns of Adherence

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 135-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica A. R. Logan ◽  
Jaclyn M. Dynia ◽  
Laura M. Justice ◽  
Brook Sawyer
Keyword(s):  
Reading Intervention ◽  
Language Impairment ◽  
Latent Class ◽  
Language Skills ◽  
Reading Program ◽  
Family Characteristics ◽  
Typically Developing ◽  
Caregiver Education ◽  
Home Based ◽  
Early Dropout

The overall purpose of this study was to examine caregivers’ adherence to a storybook-reading intervention using latent class analysis (LCA). This study also examined whether adherence was related to child and family characteristics including children’s language ability, caregiver education, and whether the child has a disability. Caregivers of children with language impairment ( N = 695) were provided with a book per week and were encouraged to read the book twice a week. Results of the LCA indicated that there were four profiles of caregivers’ adherence: sporadic, late dropout, completers, and early dropout. Completers were so-named because they adhered to study activities for the duration, completed the study as designed. These caregivers represented one third of participants, whereas dropouts (both early and late) represented the majority of caregivers (51%). This study found no reliable differences in the adherence patterns for caregivers of children with a disability and their typically developing peers. However, children who had better language skills also had significantly higher probability of continued caregiver adherence. Implications for educational research are discussed.

The Efficacy of Phonological Awareness Intervention for Children With Spoken Language Impairment

2000 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 126-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gail T. Gillon
Keyword(s):  
Phonological Awareness ◽  
Speech Production ◽  
Language Impairment ◽  
Language Skills ◽  
Reading Development ◽  
Control Program ◽  
Spoken Language ◽  
Language Intervention ◽  
Typically Developing ◽  
Speech And Language

Purpose:This study investigated the efficacy of an integrated phonological awareness intervention approach for children with spoken language impairment (SLI) who demonstrated early reading delay. Ninety-one, 5- to 7-year-old New Zealand children participated in this study: 61 children with SLI and 30 children with typically developing speech and language skills. All of the children with language impairment exhibited expressive phonological difficulties and some also had delayed semantic and syntactic development.Method:The children with SLI participated in either: (a) an integrated phonological awareness program, (b) a more traditional speech-language intervention control program that focused on improving articulation and language skills, or (c) a minimal intervention control program over a 4 1/2-month time period.Results:Effects of the interventions on phonological awareness ability, reading performance, and speech production were examined. The children who received phonological awareness intervention made significantly more gains in their phonological awareness ability and reading development than the children receiving the other types of speech and language intervention. Despite significant delays in phonological awareness prior to training, children who received the phonological awareness intervention reached levels of performance similar to children with typically developing speech and language skills at post-test assessment. The phonological awareness intervention also improved the children's speech articulation.Clinical Implications:The findings suggest that integrated phonological awareness intervention may be an efficient method to improve phonological awareness, speech production, and reading development of children with SLI. Findings are discussed with reference to a speech-literacy link model.

Pragmatics and SLI

1993 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 777-789 ◽  
Author(s):  
Holly K. Craig ◽  
Julia L. Evans
Keyword(s):  
Language Impairment ◽  
Specific Language Impairment ◽  
Language Skills ◽  
Receptive Language ◽  
Chronological Age ◽  
Specific Language ◽  
Language Status ◽  
Pragmatic Research ◽  
Normal Language ◽  
Mean Length Of Utterance

Selected discourse behaviors of children with specific language impairment (SU) presenting expressive (E:SLI) or combined expressive-receptive deficits (E-R:SLI) were compared to each other and to chronological age-mates and younger mean length of utterance (MLU)-matched children with normal-language skills. The two SLI subgroups varied from each other on specific measures of tum-taking and cohesion. These findings imply the need for future normative work with SLI subgroups differing in receptive skill, and indicate that, in the interim, pragmatic research with this population will need to consider potential effects of receptive language status when interpreting variations in outcomes for discourse-based variables.

Mathematical Abilities of Children With Specific Language Impairment

1996 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 839-849 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara B. Fazio
Keyword(s):  
Language Impairment ◽  
Specific Language Impairment ◽  
Second Grade ◽  
Typically Developing ◽  
Specific Language ◽  
Mathematical Abilities ◽  
Mental Age ◽  
Comparison Groups ◽  
Math Problems ◽  
Addition Facts

A 2-year follow-up of the mathematical abilities of young children with specific language impairment (SLI) is reported. To detect the nature of the difficulties children with SLI exhibited in mathematics, the first- and second-grade children's performance was compared to mental age and language age comparison groups of typically developing children on a series of tasks that examined conceptual, procedural, and declarative knowledge of mathematics. Despite displaying knowledge of many conceptual aspects of mathematics such as counting plates of cookies to decide which plate had "more," children with SLI displayed marked difficulty with declarative mathematical knowledge that required an immediate response such as rote counting to fifty, counting by 10's, reciting numerals backwards from 20, and addition facts such as 2 + 2=?. Moreover, children with SLI performed similarly to their cognitive peers on mathematical tasks that allowed children to use actual objects to count and on math problems that did not require them to exceed the sequence of numbers that they knew well. These findings offer further evidence that storage and/or retrieval of rote sequential material is particularly cumbersome for children with SLI.

scholarly journals Assessing language skills in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane King ◽  
Olympia Palikara
Keyword(s):  
Narrative Analysis ◽  
Language Skills ◽  
Receptive Language ◽  
Autism Spectrum ◽  
Pragmatic Language ◽  
Typically Developing ◽  
Adolescents With Autism ◽  
Evaluative Language ◽  
Teachers And Parents ◽  
Adolescents With Asd

Language abilities in adolescents with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) are variable and can be challenging to ascertain with confidence. This study aimed to compare and evaluate different forms of language assessment: standardized language testing, narrative analysis and parent/teacher reports. 14 adolescents with ASD and 14 typically developing adolescents matched on age, gender and nonverbal ability were assessed using a number of standardized assessments for receptive and expressive language skills, a standardized narrative test, two experimental narrative assessments and a parent/teacher report measure of pragmatics. The findings were that, although adolescents with ASD scored within the normal range on expressive and receptive language, their performance on narrative tasks revealed difficulties with both structural and evaluative language. It should be noted that both teachers and parents rated the pragmatic language skills of the young people with ASD as significantly lower than those of the typically developing group but parents were more likely than teachers to additionally identify difficulties in speech and syntax. The implications of these results for professionals in terms of assessing the language skills of adolescents with ASD and for the planning of appropriate intervention are discussed.

Evaluating Part V of the German version of the Token Test as a screening of specific language impairment in preschoolers

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 237-258
Author(s):  
Michaela Schmoeger ◽  
Matthias Deckert ◽  
Brigitte Eisenwort ◽  
Benjamin Loader ◽  
Annemarie Hofmair ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Language Impairment ◽  
Test Performance ◽  
Specific Language Impairment ◽  
Screening Tool ◽  
Receptive Language ◽  
Attention And Memory ◽  
German Version ◽  
Typically Developing ◽  
Specific Language ◽  
Token Test

AbstractSpecific language impairment (SLI) is a very common childhood disorder that is characterized by impairments in expressive and/or receptive language regarding different modalities. Part V of the German version of the Token Test was evaluated as a potential screening tool for the early detection of SLI. Forty-five male and 16 female monolingual native German-speaking preschoolers with SLI (4–6 years) and 61 age- and gender-matched typically developing controls were examined with a German version of the Token Test and an established intelligence measure. Token Test performance was significantly worse in preschoolers with SLI including greater group differences at age 4 than at ages 5 and 6. Analyses showed a detection rate of 77% for Part V of the Token Test in the whole sample as well as 85.1% at age 4, 80.6% at age 5, and a nonsignificant detection at age 6. Correctly detected preschoolers with SLI showed significantly worse performance than typically developing controls regarding nonverbal and verbal intelligence, numeracy, problem solving, working memory, visual attention, and memory. Children with SLI show worse Token Test performance, whereas at ages 4 and 5, Part V of the Token Test could potentially serve as a screening tool for the detection of SLI.

Semantic Features in Fast-Mapping

2004 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 407-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Alt ◽  
Elena Plante ◽  
Marlena Creusere
Keyword(s):  
Language Impairment ◽  
Specific Language Impairment ◽  
Language Skills ◽  
Recognition Task ◽  
Receptive Language ◽  
Receptive Vocabulary ◽  
Semantic Features ◽  
Fast Mapping ◽  
Specific Language ◽  
Novel Objects

This study examined the receptive language skills of young children (4–6 years old) with specific language impairment (SLI). Specifically, the authors looked at their ability to fast-map semantic features of objects and actions and compared it to the performance of age-matched peers with normally developing language (NL). Children completed a computer task during which they were exposed to novel objects and actions with novel names. The children then were asked questions about the semantic features of these novel objects and actions. Overall, the questions about actions were more difficult for children than objects. The children with SLI were able to recognize fewer semantic features than were their peers with NL. They also performed poorly relative to their peers on a lexical label recognition task. These results lend support to the idea that children with SLI have broader difficulties with receptive vocabulary than simply a reduced ability to acquire labels.

scholarly journals Do Infants With Down Syndrome Show an Early Receptive Language Advantage?

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 585-598
Author(s):  
Emily Mason-Apps ◽  
Vesna Stojanovik ◽  
Carmel Houston-Price ◽  
Emily Seager ◽  
Sue Buckley
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Language Skills ◽  
Receptive Language ◽  
Receptive Vocabulary ◽  
Typically Developing ◽  
Auditory Comprehension ◽  
Expressive Vocabulary ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Expressive Communication ◽  
Shed Light

Purpose The study explored longitudinally the course of vocabulary and general language development in a group of infants with Down syndrome (DS) compared to a group of typically developing (TD) infants matched on nonverbal mental ability (NVMA). Method We compared the vocabulary and general language trajectories of the two groups in two ways: (a) at three time points during a 12-month period and (b) at two time points when the groups had made equal progress in NVMA (a period of 6 months for the TD infants vs. 12 months for the infants with DS). Results The TD group had overtaken the DS group on all general language and vocabulary measures by the end of the 12-month period. However, expressive communication and expressive vocabulary were developing at the same rate and level in the two groups when examined over a period in which the two groups were matched in gains in NVMA. Furthermore, the infants with DS showed a receptive language advantage over the TD group; this group's auditory comprehension and receptive vocabulary scores were superior to those of the TD group at both time points when NVMA was accounted for. Conclusion The results shed light on the widely reported discrepancy between expressive and receptive language in individuals with DS. Although infants with DS appear to be developing language skills more slowly than chronological age TD peers, when NVMA is taken into account, infants with DS do not have expressive language delays, and they seem to show a receptive language advantage.

Specific language impairment in Cypriot Greek

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleni Theodorou ◽  
Maria Kambanaros ◽  
Kleanthes K. Grohmann
Keyword(s):  
Language Impairment ◽  
Specific Language Impairment ◽  
Language Skills ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Clinical Practices ◽  
Specific Language ◽  
Modern Greek ◽  
Greek Cypriot ◽  
Language Assessments ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Investigating children’s language skills in their native variety is of paramount importance. Clinical practices cannot be based on findings from languages or varieties which have different properties. This paper, after demonstrating the importance of investigating Specific Language Impairment (SLI) in Cyprus, assesses the feasibility of existing language assessments in Standard Modern Greek for the diagnosis of SLI in the Greek Cypriot context, for the children’s native variety of Cypriot Greek. In total, 16 children with SLI (5 to 9 years) and 22 age-matched typically language developing children participated in this study. However, given that not all stimuli in the Standard Greek versions were appropriate for Cypriot Greek-speaking children and because of cultural differences, the tools were adapted. Results showed that the assessment tools can accurately identify children with SLI from typically language developing peers with sensitivity and specificity when the comparison is between children that use the same variety. Keywords: acquisition; bilectalism; diagnosis; sensitivity; specificity

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document