scholarly journals PROSES BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA REALISTIK MATERI GEOMETRI DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 51-60
Author(s):  
Finsensius Yesekiel Naja ◽  
Agustina Mei ◽  
Sofia Sa'o
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Mathematical Problems ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Thinking Processes

The purpose of this study is to describe the profile of students' critical thinking in solving realistic mathematical problems of geometry material in terms of learning styles. This research is a descriptive study with a qualitative approach. Critical thinking in this study refers to critical thinking with FRISCO criteria. In this study, subjects were taken from students of class VII SMP N 2 Ende Selatan. Each student's research subjects have visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles. Data collection is done by providing a Problem Solving Test (TPM) and an interview. The results obtained, subjects who have a visual learning style, critical thinking processes in solving realistic mathematical problems, able to understand problems, the subject has not been able to determine ways to solve problems, the subject has not been able to carry out the settlement and the subject does not re-examine. Subjects who have auditory learning styles, critical thinking profiles in solving realistic mathematical problems are able to understand problems, but the subject does not re-examine. Subjects who have kinesthetic learning styles of critical thinking processes in solving realistic mathematical problems are able to understand problems, are able to plan problems, subjects can carry out well and check the results.

scholarly journals The Process of Students' Mathematical Connection in Solving Mathematical Problems in terms of Learning Styles

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 1451-1466
Author(s):  
Baiduri Baiduri, Arif Hidayatul Khusna, Mar’atus Solikhah
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
Process Data ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Mathematical Connections ◽  
Mathematical Problems ◽  
Mathematical Connection

The purpose of this study was to describe the process of students' mathematical connections in solving mathematical problems in terms of learning styles. The type of research used is descriptive research with a qualitative approach. The research subjects were six students consisting of two students who have a visual learning style, two students who have an auditory learning style, and two students who have a kinesthetic learning style. Student learning style data were collected through learning style questionnaires, while student connection process data were collected through mathematical connection test sheets and interviews. Data credibility is done by triangulating sources and methods. Data from the six subjects consisting of two students for each of these learning styles were described and categorized from the same, different, and specific views. The subjects obtained from the results of the learning style questionnaire were compared using the results of the mathematical connection test and interviews. Data analysis was guided by four steps to solve Polya's problems and was carried out in three stages, namely data condensation, data presentation, and conclusions. The results showed that there are differences in the mathematical connection process carried out by students who have visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles in the step of understanding the problem. However, there are similarities in the mathematical connection process carried out by students who have visual and kinesthetic learning styles at the step of compiling a completion plan and checking again. while students who have a different auditory learning style from students who have visual and kinesthetic learning styles in implementing the completion plan and re-checking. The process of mathematical connection of students who have an auditory learning style at the step of checking back cannot be seen, because these students do not take this step when solving problems. Researchers suggest that teachers need to accustom students to connecting mathematics both internally and externally and pay attention to the emphasis of the material given to students so that students' mathematical connections are more developed. because the student did not take this step when solving the problem. Researchers suggest that teachers need to accustom students to connecting mathematics both internally and externally and pay attention to the emphasis of the material given to students so that students' mathematical connections are more developed. because the student did not take this step when solving the problem. Researchers suggest that teachers need to accustom students to connecting mathematics both internally and externally and pay attention to the emphasis of the material given to students so that students' mathematical connections are more developed.

scholarly journals Analisis Analisis Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pecahan ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar

KadikmA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Ayu Imamatul Muslimah
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Basic Skills ◽  
Learning Abilities ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Interview Method ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Thinking Processes

In learning activities, one of the efforts that can be done to improve students' learning abilities is to support learning styles that are following the objectives so that learning can be done effectively. This research was conducted at Junior High School 1 Kalisat, located at Jl. Diponegoro 52 Kalisat, Jember. This study aims to describe the students' critical thinking processes in solving fraction problems in terms of visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles. Data collection techniques used consisted of learning style questionnaires, critical thinking tests, and interview method. The subjects in this study were 6 students consisting of 2 students who represented visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles. Based on data analysis, the results show that students with a visual and kinesthetic learning style meet five indicators of critical thinking, namely basic clarification, basic skills, concluding, further clarification, and strategies and tactics. Students with auditory learning styles meet the four indicators of critical thinking namely basic clarification, building basic skills, further clarification, and concluding. While students with auditory learning styles are less able to meet the indicators of strategies and tactics. Keywords: Critical Thinking, Learning Styles, Fraction Problems

scholarly journals Kemampuan Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Matematika Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Siswa Kelas VII

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-211
Author(s):  
Eva Nurdiana ◽  
Ketut Sarjana ◽  
Muhammad Turmuzi ◽  
Sri Subarinah
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Story Problems ◽  
Test Question ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
The Subject

This study aims to find out the ability to solve math story problems reviewed from the learning style of grade VII students. The type of research used is descriptive research with qualitative approach. The sample class was selected using cluster random sampling techniques and obtained 32 students who were taken 25% of the population, the sample was randomly taken 8 students from each class. The samples obtained were given a study style questionnaire in order to classify the sample into visual, auditorial and kinesthetic learning style categories. The sample that was the subject of the interview and the subject given the test question was selected based on the three categories of study style, which was taken randomly 20% of the sample of each learning style. Students' ability to solve math story problems is reviewed from known learning styles through analysis of students' answers in solving number material story questions and based on interview results. The analysis technique used is descriptive statistical analysis. From the results of the study obtained: The ability to solve math story problems of students with visual learning style, auditory learning and kinesthetic learning is  good criteria, less criteria,and less criteria.

STUDENT’S LEARNING STYLES IN LEARNING READING COMPREHENSION

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sinta sasmita And Siti Aisah Ginting
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Tenth Grade ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Auditory Learners

This study is about student’s learning styles in learning reading comprehension. The design of this research was descriptive research. The data were collected by using questionnaires and observation sheet. The subject of the study are the XI AP 2 of SMK Swasta Harapan Stabat and the object of the study are the students learning styles in learning reading comprehension. The data were analyzed by using Fleming theory. The purpose of conducting this research was find out whether the most dominant learning style in reading comprehension and to find out what are the types of student’s learning styles which has higher achievement in reading comprehension of XI grade in SMK Swasta Harapan Stabat in academic 2016/2017. There were 32 students as the subject of this research. In this case, the researcher collected the data by using learning style questionnaire and observation. The result showed that auditory learning style is the most dominant learning style at the tenth grade students at SMK Swasta Harapan Stabat, the percentage was 71,87%, it means 23 from 32 students prefer to hear than read and move. The second was kinesthetic learning style, the score, 21,88%, means that only 7 students prefer to move. Then, visual learning style, score 6,25%, means that 2 from 32 students prefer to read. For the fastest student’s in reading comprehension came from auditory students or auditory learners. They get score 69,56% followed kinesthetic 21,74%, and visual 8,70%.

scholarly journals STUDENTS' CRITICAL THINKING ABILITY, CREATIVE AND LEARNING STYLE IN BAHASA INDONESIA LEARNING FOR GRADE IV SD NEGERI 112238 SEPADAN JAYA

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-182
Author(s):  
Ariati Ariati ◽  
Isda Pramuniati ◽  
Evi Eviyanti
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Critical Thinking Ability ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
School Year ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Bahasa Indonesia

Abstract This study aims to describe students 'critical thinking ability, students' creativity skills, and the learning style of grade 4 students at SDN 112238 Sepadan Jaya in Indonesian language lessons. This research uses qualitative descriptive method with a population of all grade 4 students at SDN 112238 Sepadan Jaya in the 2020/2021 school year of 21 students. The variables in this study were students' critical thinking ability, creativity, and learning style which included visual, auditorial and kinesthetic. Data collection techniques using questionnaires and analysis techniques used are descriptive statistics. The results showed that the average grade 4 at SDN 112238 Sepadan Jaya in the 2020/2021 school year in Bahasa Indonesia has the majority ability in the highly critical thinking category, at around 47.6%. Ability majority in the creative category, in percentage about 66.67%. The majority of learning styles are Kinesthetic, students have a tendency to one of the visual, auditory or kinesthetic learning styles, with the average student having a tendency on visual learning style 33.33%, auditory learning style 14.28%, and kinesthetic learning style 52.38%.

scholarly journals Mathematical Communication Profiles on Learning Styles in Solving High School Level Mathematics Problems

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 213
Author(s):  
Wiwik Andriani ◽  
Nurmayaningsih Nurmayaningsih
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Mathematical Communication ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Mathematical Ideas ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Mathematics Problems ◽  
Mathematical Problems

This study aims to see the mathematics communication of students in terms of learning styles in solving high school mathematics problems. The focus of this research is: students' mathematics communication in terms of visual learning styles, mathematics communication in terms of auditory learning styles, mathematics communication in terms of kinesthetic learning styles. The subjects of this study were students at SMA Negeri 1 Gowa who were grouped based on their learning styles. The research instrument is the researcher himself, because the researcher himself plans what to ask the research subjects. Data collection techniques are carried out by providing learning style questionnaires, carrying out written tests to see mathematical communication skills, and interview guidelines. This study used technical triangulation with data analysis techniques, namely data presentation, data reduction, and conclusions. The results of this study indicate that the level of mathematics communication can be seen from the learning styles of students. Students with visual and auditory learning styles are able to solve mathematical problems completely and in detail, are able to use mathematical ideas, are able to use mathematical notations and symbols to determine answer conclusions. Students who have a kinesthetic learning style are also able to solve mathematical problems in their own style and way, namely a shorter way, being able to use mathematical ideas, symbols and mathematical notations in solving problems, but they do not provide conclusions from the answers that are done

scholarly journals KEMAMPUAN VISUAL SPASIAL SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL PISA KONTEN SHAPE AND SPACE BERDASARKAN GAYA BELAJAR

KadikmA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
Nur Eni Isnaini
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Pattern Search ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Visual Ability ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Collection Methods

This study aims to describe students' spatial-visual ability in solving PISA questions in shape and space content based on visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles. This type of research used in this research is descriptive qualitative research. Subjects in the study were six students from Class X MIPA 3 SMA Negeri 2 Tanggul consisting of two students from each of the visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles. The data collection methods used were questionnaires, tests, and interviews. The instruments used in this study were learning style questionnaires, shape and space content PISA test questions, and interview guidelines. The results showed that the achievement of the characteristics of the sixth spatial-visual abilities of the subjects differed. Students with a visual learning style can meet the characteristics of pattern search, conceptualization, problem-solving, and imagination in full. Students with an auditory learning style can meet the characteristics of conceptualization, problem-solving, and imagination completely but are unable to meet the characteristics of pattern search. Students with kinesthetic learning styles meet the characteristics of problem solving and imagination but are unable to meet indicators on the characteristics of pattern search and conceptualization. This can be seen from the results of solving the questions given and interviews conducted on the research subjects. Keyword: Spatial-Visual Ability, PISA Questions on Shape and Space Content, Learning Style

scholarly journals Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Logis Matematis Siswa SMP Kelas VII dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Desi Melatul Fitriyah ◽  
Nonik Indrawatiningsih ◽  
Miftahul Khoiri
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Vital Role ◽  
Logical Thinking ◽  
Mathematical Concepts ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Mathematical Problems ◽  
The Subject

<p>Kemampuan berpikir logis memiliki peran penting dalam pemecahan dan pembelajaran konsep matematika dan untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif deskriptif yang bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan kemampuan berpikir logis siswa kelas VII dalam memecahkan masalah matematika yang ditinjau dari gaya belajar pada pokok bahasan aritmatika sosial. Subjek dalam penelitian ini berjumlah 3 siswa dengan siswa bergaya belajar visual, auditori dan kenestetik. Pengumpulan data menggunakan angket gaya belajar, tes kemampuan berpikir logis, wawancara dan dokumentasi. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, subjek bergaya belajar visual memiliki kemampuan berpikir logis yaitu pada tahap klasifikasi, tahap menghubungkan, tahap menghitung dan tahap menarik kesimpulan. Subjek bergaya belajar auditori memiliki kemampuan berpikir logis yaitu pada tahap klasifikasi, tahap menghubungkan, tahap menghitung dan tahap menarik kesimpulan. Sedangkan subjek bergaya belajar kinestetik memiliki kemampuan berpikir logis yaitu pada tahap klasifikasi, tahap menghubungkan dan tahap menarik kesimpulan.</p><p> </p><p>The ability to think logically has a vital role in solving and learning mathematical concepts, its to improve learning outcomes. This research is descriptive qualitative research that aims to describe the ability of students to think logically in class VII in solving mathematical problems in terms of learning styles on the subject of social arithmetic. The subjects in this study amounted to 3 students with students learning styles visual, auditory, and kinesthetic. Data collection uses learning style questionnaires, logical thinking skills tests, interviews, and documentation. The results of the study show that three stages of the logical thinking ability with visual learning style subject, namely the connecting stage, the counting stage, and the conclusion drawing stage. Auditory learning style subjects can think logically that is at the classification stage, the connecting stage, the counting stage, and the conclusion drawing stage. Whereas the kinesthetic learning style subject can think logically, that is at the classification stage, the connecting stage, and the conclusion drawing stage.</p>

HUBUNGAN GAYA BELAJAR SISWA TERHADAP ASPEK PENGETAHUAN SISWA PADA MATA PELAJARAN SISTEM KOMPUTER DI SMK IT RAHMATAN KARIMAH BENGKULU TENGAH

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (01) ◽  
pp. 13-20
Author(s):  
Dian Saputra
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Computer System ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Analysis Techniques ◽  
Post Test ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Relationship

This study aims to find out the relationship between learning style and students’ knowledge aspect on Computer System Subject at SMK IT Rahmatan Karimah of  Central Bengkulu, the type of research is quantitative and the subject of research is grade X in SMK IT Rahmatan Karimah of  Central Bengkulu. Data collection techniques using observation, Questionnaire and documentation. Data analysis techniques used were Descriptive Analysis, and inferential Statistical Analysis. The results of visual learning style post-test were 11 people with a mean of 76.36, an auditory learning style of 8 people at a mean of 62.14, a kinesthetic learning style of 3 people at a mean of 50.33, apart from that (r x y = 2.35) and the magnitude of r is reflected in the table (r table = 0.4132). Then rxy > r table ie = 2.35> 0.4132. In other words, Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. It has a significant relationship between the learning styles of students and students’ knowledge aspect on Computer System Subject of grade X TKJ in SMK IT Rahmatan Karimah of  Central Bengkulu

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS PESERTA DIDIK KELAS X SMK NEGERI 2 WATAMPONE

2017 ◽  
pp. 45
Author(s):  
Rusnilawarni Rusnilawarni
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Electrolyte Solution ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Instructional Model ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Critical Thinking Ability ◽  
Thinking Ability

This research aims to identify the influence of interaction instructional model and learning style to critical thinking ability of students in class X SMK Negeri 2 Watampone in electrolyte and nonelectrolyte solution. The type of research is quasi-experimental using factorial design 2x3. Population of the research is all of studentsin class X SMK Negeri 2 Watampone school year 2014/2015 consist of 9 class, which amounted to 288 students. The sample is taken by twice of purposive sampling, and the selected classesis X TITL 1 (electric installation technique) and X TITL 2. The Hypothesis test is conducted by SPSS 20 Program using two way Anova. The results of descriptive statistic are average critical thinking ability that students taught using inquiry learning model and cooperative tipe articulation learning are 75.78 and 66.40. Average score critical thinking ability of learners who have learning styles kinethetic, visual and auditory are 73.34, 65.00 and 63.15. The results of this study show that (1) There is no  influence of instructional model to critical thinking abilityof students in class X SMK Negeri 2 Watampone in electrolyte and non electrolyte solution, (2) There is no influence of visual learning style, auditory and kinesthetic toward the critical thinking abilityof students in class X SMK Negeri 2 Watampone in electrolyte and non electrolyte solution, (3) There is an interaction between the instructional model and learningstyles in influencing the critical thinking ability of students in class X SMK Negeri 2 Watampone in electrolyte and non electrolyte solution. Tukey HSD test result show that critical thinking ability of learners who have learning styles kinesthetic higher than the learners who have visual and auditory learning styles, and than critical thinking ability of learners who have learning styles visual and auditory learning style is not different.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document