scholarly journals El Estado como garante de los derechos de los pueblos originarios en Argentina / The argentinian State as guarantor of aboriginal’s rights

2019 ◽  
pp. 164-171
Author(s):  
María Florencia Blanco Pighi
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Right To Health ◽  
International Human Rights ◽  
Derechos Humanos ◽  
Court Of Justice ◽  
Human Rights Treaties ◽  
International Human ◽  
The Right

Los derechos humanos de los pueblos originarios, entre ellos, el derecho a la salud, son reconocidos por la Constitución Argentina, por tratados internacionales ratificados por nuestro país, por la normativa interna y por las constituciones provinciales. La Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación, mediante el fallo en análisis, establece que la protección de estos derechos debe asegurarse por la vía más idónea, y que, al existir una acción de amparo en curso, la medida cautelar de interposición más reciente, debe ser rechazada.   The Argentinian Constitution, the international human rights treaties ratified by Argentina, the argentine internal regulations and the constitution of several provinces, recognize the aboriginal´s human rights, including the right to health. In the judgment in analysis, the Argentinian Supreme Court of Justice, states that the protection of those rights needs to be accomplish by the most suitable way. When a legal protection action is in curse, the most recently filed action must be rejected.

scholarly journals Derecho a la salud reproductiva / Rigth to reproductive health

2019 ◽  
pp. 197-205
Author(s):  
Nadia Virginia Copello
Keyword(s):  
Reproductive Health ◽  
Right To Life ◽  
International Human Rights ◽  
Medically Assisted Reproduction ◽  
Derechos Humanos ◽  
Court Of Justice ◽  
Human Rights Treaties ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
International Human ◽  
The Right

El derecho a la salud reproductiva tiene una relación directa con el derecho a la vida, encontrándose amparado por los tratados internacionales de derechos humanos. Es razonable que existan limitaciones a estos derechos, puesto que no son absolutos, pero estas restricciones deben ser razonables. En el caso que analizaremos, la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación adopta una posición intermedia respecto del derecho a la salud reproductiva. Para ello, partiendo de la finalidad de la ley 26.862, esto es: “garantizar el acceso integral a los procedimientos y técnicas médico-asistenciales de reproducción médicamente asistida”y, teniendo en cuenta los derechos en juego, resolvió en favor de la vigencia del derecho dentro de parámetros razonables. The right to reproductive health is directly related to the right to life, being protected by international human rights treaties. It is reasonable that there are limitations to these rights, since they are not absolute, but these restrictions must be reasonable. In the case we will analyze, the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation adopts an intermediate position regarding the right to reproductive health. To do this, based on the purpose of Law 26.862, this is: “guaranteeing comprehensive access to medico-assistance procedures and techniques of medically assisted reproduction” and, taking into account the rights at stake, resolved in favor of the validity of the right within reasonable parameters.

3 Right to be Presumed Innocent

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clooney Amal ◽  
Webb Philippa
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Burden Of Proof ◽  
Reasonable Doubt ◽  
International Human Rights ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Human Rights Treaties ◽  
International Human ◽  
Assessment Of Evidence ◽  
The Right

This chapter focuses on the right to be presumed innocent, one of the most ancient and important principles of criminal justice, and a prerequisite for any system based on the rule of law. The right is absolute and non-derogable and, at its core, prohibits convictions that are predetermined or based on flimsy grounds. International human rights bodies have therefore found that where a conviction is based on non-existent, insufficient, or unreliable evidence, the presumption has been violated and a miscarriage of justice has occurred. More frequently, international human rights bodies have applied the presumption to require specific procedural protections during a trial. These include guarantees that the prosecution bears the burden of proving a defendant’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and that the defendant should not be presented or described as a criminal before he has been proved to be one. The chapter concludes that the presumption is protected in similar terms in international human rights treaties, but also highlights divergences in international jurisprudence relating to the standard for finding that a court’s assessment of evidence violates the presumption, the permissibility of reversing the burden of proof, and the extent to which the presumption applies after a trial has been completed.

Part IV The Right to Reparation/Guarantees of Non-Recurrence, A The Right to Reparation, Principle 32 Reparation Procedures

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
d’Argent Pierre ◽  
de Ghellinck Isabelle
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Theoretical Framework ◽  
Historical Background ◽  
International Level ◽  
Human Right ◽  
International Human Rights ◽  
Human Rights Treaties ◽  
International Human ◽  
The Right ◽  
Procedural Aspect

Principle 32 deals with the procedural aspect of the right to reparation, that is, the right for victims of human right violations to access remedial procedures. It addresses three issues: the right to access remedial procedures, procedural requirements of national reparation programmes, and regional and international procedures. While the obligation of states to provide effective remedies is enshrined in most of, if not all, the key international human rights treaties, Principle 32 provides for a right to all victims to access remedies. ‘Reparation’ and ‘remedies’ are both envisioned as victims’ rights, but the distinction between them is vague. After providing a contextual and historical background on Principle 32, this chapter discusses its theoretical framework and how the reparation procedure, judicial or administrative, dealing with gross violations of human rights at national or international level has been implemented.

scholarly journals Conflict over Conflict: The Right to Strike in International Law

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane F Frey
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
International Law ◽  
International Human Rights Law ◽  
Political Rights ◽  
International Labour Organisation ◽  
International Human Rights ◽  
Cultural Rights ◽  
Human Rights Treaties ◽  
International Human ◽  
The Right

<p>The existence of a right to strike under international law has been challenged by the International Organization of Employers since the late 1980s. The employer group claims that no such right exists under international law and has been moving to undermine recognition of the right at the International Labour Organisation (ILO). This article examines the right to strike in international human rights law. It considers specifically the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and finds that the right to strike exists in both of these treaties. Further, the article demonstrates that while the ILO employers group may challenge the existence of the right to strike, its government members have overwhelmingly ratified international human rights treaties contradicting the employer group's position that there is no such right.</p>

Humanitarian Bottom League? Sweden and the Right to Health for Undocumented Migrants

2010 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon Alexander
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Human Rights ◽  
Asylum Seekers ◽  
Right To Health ◽  
International Human Rights Law ◽  
Undocumented Migrants ◽  
International Human Rights ◽  
Emergency Situations ◽  
International Human ◽  
The Right

AbstractICESCR article 12 generously grants “everyone” the right to the highest attainable standard of mental and physical health. Ironically, “everyone” is reduced to “most” when held up to scrutiny, but certainly includes migrants. Migrants are entitled to the full realization of the right to health regardless of their legal or immigration status. This realization is threatened as States restrict health care, via legal and financial means, in order to punish undocumented migrants and deter migration. One such State is Sweden where the recent “Law Concerning Health Care for Asylum Seekers and Others” caused one progressive Parliamentarian to lament that its restrictive policies regarding health care and undocumented migrants would put Sweden in the “humanitarian bottom league”. Indeed, Swedish legislation, practice and policy are generally inconsistent with its international human rights obligations towards undocumented migrants, asylum seekers and refugees and their right to health. Undocumented migrants are entitled to unsubsidized health care only in immediate and emergency situations. Care is difficult to access and prohibitively expensive in many cases. Asylum seekers and failed asylum seekers who are not in hiding are only entitled to subsidized maternity care, care that cannot wait or emergency care. Moreover, a lack of cultural competence amongst caretakers may have a detrimental impact on the quality of care given to these migrants. Consequently, Swedish practice and policy are often at odds with its international human rights law obligations. This threatens to relegate a State that has always been considered a member of the “humanitarian major league” to a one that wallows in the “humanitarian bottom league”.

The Qualification for Being a Refugee under eu Law: Religion as a Reason for Persecution

2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 535-558
Author(s):  
Alexandra Maria Rodrigues Araújo
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Religious Freedom ◽  
Eu Law ◽  
Refugee Status ◽  
International Human Rights ◽  
Court Of Justice ◽  
International Human ◽  
The Individual ◽  
The Right ◽  
Human Rights Standards

The Court of Justice in Y and Z deals with persecution in the form of interference in the right to practise one’s religion. The main aspects of the judgment can be summarized in the following three statements: in order to be granted refugee status under eu law, only a severe violation of religious freedom can be regarded as an act of persecution; the severity of the acts of persecution must be identified on the basis of the nature of the repression inflicted on the individual and its consequences; the competent authorities cannot expect the applicant to abstain from religious practices upon the return to his country of origin. Y and Z is an undeniable reference towards the interpretation of religion-based persecution provisions of the Qualification Directive. From the perspective of religious freedom, the Court reinforces the commitment of the eu with the European and international human rights standards concerning this right.

scholarly journals STATE SOVEREIGNTY, INTERNATIONAL HUMAN MOBILITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 198
Author(s):  
Luís Renato Vedovato ◽  
Samyra Haydêe Dal Farra Naspolini
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Human Mobility ◽  
The State ◽  
State Sovereignty ◽  
International Human Rights ◽  
The Past ◽  
Human Rights Treaties ◽  
International Human ◽  
The Right

International human mobility and human rights can be linked by the dinamogenesis theory. The State sovereignty isn’t the same it was in the past. The State can’t decide about the right to entry without consider international human rights treaties. The nationality has an important row in finding how dinamogenesis can modify the interpretation of the State sovereignty. The right to entry is built in the evolution of human rights. Now State has no more the discretion to decide who can enter its territory, due to dinamogenesis and human rights.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document