scholarly journals La adjudicación judicial: modelos de racionalidad jurídica y particularidades de la decisión judicial en materia de salud

Author(s):  
Lucía Irene Lapenta

Este artículo presenta un análisis sobre las particularidades del razonamiento judicial en materia de salud, en el marco de los modelos de racionalidad material. A tal fin, se analizan cinco fallos jurisprudenciales y se ofrecen algunas reflexiones en relación con el razonamiento judicial subyacente, identificando aquellos elementos que caracterizan la toma de decisión judicial en materia de salud.   This article presents an analysis of the specifications in judicial reasoning in health matters, with reference to models of material rationality. To do that, we analyze five jurisprudential decisions and offer some reflections in relation to the underlying judicial reasoning, identifying those elements that characterize the judicial decision making regarding the Right to Health.

Author(s):  
Jeffrey J. Rachlinski ◽  
Chris Guthrie ◽  
Andrew J. Wistrich

Legal Studies ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Claire Hamilton

Abstract The changes to the Irish exclusionary rule introduced by the judgment in People (DPP) v JC mark an important watershed in the Irish law of evidence and Irish legal culture more generally. The case relaxed the exclusionary rule established in People (DPP) v Kenny, one of the strictest in the common law world, by creating an exception based on ‘inadvertence’. This paper examines the decision through the lens of legal culture, drawing in particular on Lawrence Friedman's distinction between ‘internal’ and ‘external’ legal culture to help understand the factors contributing to the decision. The paper argues that Friedman's concept and, in particular, the dialectic between internal and external legal culture, holds much utility at a micro as well as macro level, in interrogating the cultural logics at work in judicial decision-making.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hubert Smekal ◽  
Jaroslav Benák ◽  
Monika Hanych ◽  
Ladislav Vyhnánek ◽  
Štěpán Janků

The book studies other than purely legal factors that influence the Czech Constitutional Court judges in their decision-making. The publication is inspired by foreign models of judicial decision-making and discusses their applicability in the Czech environment. More specifically, it focuses, for example, on the influence of the judge’s personality, collegiality, strategic decision-making or the impact of public opinion and the media. The book is based mainly on interviews with current constitutional judges.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document