scholarly journals The Use of a Uniaxial Accelerometer to Assess Physical-activity-related Energy Expenditure in Obese Men and Women: Saku Control Obesity Program (SCOP)

2008 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Motohiko Miyachi ◽  
Yumi Ohmori ◽  
Kenta Yamamoto ◽  
Hiroshi Kawano ◽  
Haruka Murakami ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 399-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarina Francescato Torres ◽  
Júlia Guimarães Reis ◽  
Daniela Cristina Carvalho de Abreu

Objective To verify the effects of gender and physical activity on postural sway. Method A cross-sectional study was conducted to analyze upright balance of young men and women between the ages of 20-30, both active and sedentary. Study participants were 60 individuals, who were divided into: active women (n = 15), sedentary women (n = 15), active men (n = 15) and sedentary men (n = 15). The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) short form, was used to evaluate each participant’s level of physical activity. According to the questionnaire, active individuals are those who carry out moderate activity, with an energy expenditure between 3.5 and 6 METs (1 MET: 3.5 ml/kg/min), or vigorous activity, with an energy expenditure above 6 METs, at least three days a week for 20 minutes. To assess control of postural sway, we measured the amplitude and velocity of anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) sway in standing position, with their eyes open and closed, with and without foam, on a force platform. Results Comparison between genders revealed that, when compared to sedentary women, sedentary men displayed poorer performance in velocity and amplitude of AP postural control sway with their eyes closed, with and without foam. There were no differences in the amplitude and velocity of ML sway, both with open and closed eyes among groups (p < 0.05). There were no differences when comparing physically active men and women either. Conclusion Sedentary men seem to rely more on vision for maintaining postural control in quiet standing situations with respect to women.


1973 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.E. Lonergan ◽  
J.S. Milne ◽  
J. Williamson

Obesity ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 950-956 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Jacobi ◽  
Anne-Elisabeth Perrin ◽  
Natacha Grosman ◽  
Marie-France Doré ◽  
Sylvie Normand ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e5-e10 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Melzer ◽  
M. Lazzeri ◽  
S. Armand ◽  
M. Boulvain ◽  
Y. Schutz ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 118 ◽  
Author(s):  
J D Pillay

Background. The festive season is a time when people are at risk of overeating and weight gain. An active break during this time can help maintain energy balance. Objectives. To determine steps taken during a walk/hike to Everest Base Camp and back and compare estimated activityrelated energy expenditure to a typical Christmas lunch. Methods. Five adults (39-70 years) completed an 11-day walk/hike. Pedometer-measured steps were recorded at two cadences: ‘aerobic’ (>100 steps/minute for 10 consecutive minutes) or ‘slower’ steps. Activity-related energy expenditure was estimated using generic values for walking uphill/downhill at each cadence. Energy intake of a typical Christmas lunch was estimated. Results. Participants accumulated a total of 143 770 steps, or 13 070 (SD 8 272) steps/day, 20% of which were ‘aerobic’. Total walk-related energy expenditure was estimated at 22 816  kcals, or 1 901 (SD 580) kcals/day. Conclusion. Estimated energy intake in one Christmas lunch equates to 1.7 days of walking/hiking. Keywords. Energy intake, physical activity, energy expenditure, pedometer


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document