scholarly journals Key performance indicators of compatibility process between knowledge workers and workplaces

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Gaižauskienė ◽  
Živilė Tunčikienė
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Knowledge Workers ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
Business Sector ◽  
Dynamic Approach ◽  
Main Structure ◽  
Systemic Analysis ◽  
Research Organizations ◽  
Preparation Step

The study in this article reveals the main structure of indicators that should be used in order to measure compatibility process in knowledge-intense organizations. Due to shift of management logic of Fit theory and extencively accepted presumption of talent shortage, management of compatibility became in highlight. Many research organizations and business sector companies are using key performance indicators for managing compatibility, but there is lack of data how successfully public sector companies are using them. Created and proposed methodology of assessment is a preparation step of empirical research. The systemic analysis of indicators which are used in managing compatibility between knowledge workersand workplaces solutions in a dynamic approach were investigated to create application technique.

scholarly journals Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) in the Public Sector: A Study in Malaysia

2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zaherawati Zakaria ◽  
Mahazril ‘Aini Yaacob ◽  
Zuraini Yaacob ◽  
Nazni Noordin ◽  
Mohd Zool Hilmie Mohamed Sawal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
The Public

Dynamic capabilities and their impact on research organizations’ R&D and innovation performance

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 603-630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina Babelytė-Labanauskė ◽  
Šarunas Nedzinskas
Keyword(s):  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Dynamic Capabilities ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
Positive Influence ◽  
Influential Factors ◽  
Innovation Performance ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Research Organizations ◽  
Foreign Countries

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to reveal and justify influential factors of dynamic capabilities on research organizations’ R&D and innovation performance. Design/methodology/approach Adoption of seminal D. Teece’s (1997) concept of dynamic capabilities and operationalized matrix of key performance indicators in the area of R&D and innovation allowed the construction of the strategic management model for research organizations, consequently tested by methods of statistical analysis. Findings The empirical findings reveal that there exists positive influence of the dynamic capabilities on research organizations’ R&D and innovation performance. Explicitly, sensing, seizing and re-configuring dimensions of dynamic capabilities have positive impact on R&D and innovation results; consequently, the peculiarities of their inter-dependencies are identified. Research limitations/implications Delivered research is based on the investigation of Lithuanian research organizations’ dynamic capabilities and their impact on their R&D and innovation performance. Therefore, further research could be extended to foreign countries. Practical implications The model on management of research organization’s dynamic capabilities with the aim for better R&D and innovation performance is conceptualized and specified hereinafter. In the course of the research, constructed toolkit to eventually measure research organization’s R&D and innovation performance or use it as the set of key performance indicators in the benchmarking exercise is suggested. Originality/value The paper is one of the first to suggest novel application of dynamic capabilities’ view within the domain of research organizations.

Optimalisasi Key Performance Indicators (KPI) Melalui Pendekatan Balance Scorecard Upaya Mengimplementasikan Performance Management System (PMS) Pada Perguruan Tinggi

CCIT Journal ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-34
Author(s):  
Untung Rahardja ◽  
Muhamad Yusup Eva ◽  
Rosyifa Rosyifa
Keyword(s):  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Management System ◽  
Educational Institution ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
Individual Performance ◽  
The State ◽  
Public Institution ◽  
Performance Measurement System ◽  
Educational Institutions ◽  
Successful Implementation

SQL Server Reporting Services is a way to analyze data, create reports using the indicators and gauges. Indicators are minimal gauges that convey the state of a single data value at a glance, and most are used to represent the state of Key Performance Indicators. Manage and harmonize the performance of an institution's educational institutions, especially universities with the performance of individuals or resources, no doubt is one of the essential elements for the success of an entity of the institution. Integrate the performance of an educational institution with individual performance is not an easy process, and therefore required a systematic approach to manage it. Implementation of a strategic management system based Balanced Scorecard can be used as a performance measurement system that will continuously monitor the successful implementation of the strategy of any public educational institution and measure the performance of its resources in a comprehensive and balanced, not the quantity but the emphasis is more concerned with the quality, so the performance of educational institutions at any time can be known clearly. Contribution of Key Performance Indicators to manage and harmonize the performance of any public institution is a solution in providing information to realize the extent of work that has set targets, identify and monitor measures of success, of course, with performance indicators show a clear, specific and measurable.

Strategic planning in grassland farming: Principles andapplications

1997 ◽  
pp. 191-197
Author(s):  
W.J. Parker ◽  
N.M. Shadbolt ◽  
D.I. Gray
Keyword(s):  
Strategic Planning ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
Strategic Plans ◽  
Effective Manner ◽  
Farm Business ◽  
Pastoral Farming ◽  
Financial Environment

Three levels of planning can be distinguished in grassland farming: strategic, tactical and operational. The purpose of strategic planning is to achieve a sustainable long-term fit of the farm business with its physical, social and financial environment. In pastoral farming, this essentially means developing plans that maximise and best match pasture growth with animal demand, while generating sufficient income to maintain or enhance farm resources and improvements, and attain personal and financial goals. Strategic plans relate to the whole farm business and are focused on the means to achieve future needs. They should be routinely (at least annually) reviewed and monitored for effectiveness through key performance indicators (e.g., Economic Farm Surplus) that enable progress toward goals to be measured in a timely and cost-effective manner. Failure to link strategy with control is likely to result in unfulfilled plans. Keywords: management, performance

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document