Estimation of Saturation Changes at the Edvard Grieg Field Using Simultaneous 4D Wave-Equation Based AVO Inversion

Author(s):  
P.E. Dhelie ◽  
V. Danielsen ◽  
K.R. Straith ◽  
A.O. Ndingwan ◽  
J.A. Haugen ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.E. Dhelie ◽  
V. Danielsen ◽  
K.R. Straith ◽  
A .O. Ndingwan ◽  
A. Droujinina ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 92-101
Author(s):  
Arturo Contreras ◽  
Andre Gerhardt ◽  
Paul Spaans ◽  
Matthew Docherty

Multiple state-of-the-art inversion methods have been implemented to integrate 3D seismic amplitude data, well logs, geologic information, and spatial variability to produce models of the subsurface. Amplitude variation with angle (AVA) deterministic, stochastic, and wave-equation-based amplitude variation with offset (WEB-AVO) inversion algorithms are used to describe Intra-Triassic Mungaroo gas reservoirs located in the Carnarvon Basin, Western Australia. The interpretation of inverted elastic properties in terms of lithology- and fluid-sensitive attributes from AVA deterministic inversion provides quantitative information about the geomorphology of fluvio-deltaic sediments as well as the delineation of gas reservoirs. AVA stochastic inversion delivers higher resolution realizations than those obtained from standard deterministic methods and allows for uncertainty analysis. Additionally, the cosimulation of petrophysical parameters from elastic properties provides precise 3D models of reservoir properties, such as volume of shale and water saturation, which can be used as part of the static model building process. Internal multiple scattering, transmission effects, and mode conversion (considered as noise in conventional linear inversion) become useful signals in WEB-AVO inversion. WEB-AVO compressibility shows increased sensitivity to residual/live gas discrimination compared to fluid-sensitive attributes obtained with conventional inversions.


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. SL43-SL56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dries Gisolf ◽  
Peter R. Haffinger ◽  
Panos Doulgeris

Wave-equation-based amplitude-variation-with-offset (AVO) inversion solves the full elastic wave equation, for the properties as well as the total wavefield in the object domain, from a set of observations. The relationship between the data and the property set to invert for is essentially nonlinear. This makes wave-equation-based inversion a nonlinear process. One way of visualizing this nonlinearity is by noting that all internal multiple scattering and mode conversions, as well as traveltime differences between the real medium and the background medium, are accounted for by the wave equation. We have developed an iterative solution to this nonlinear inversion problem that seems less likely to be trapped in local minima. The surface recorded data are preconditioned to be more representative for the target interval, by redatuming, or migration. The starting model for the inversion is a very smooth (0–4 Hz) background model constructed from well data. Depending on the data quality, the nonlinear inversion may even update the background model, leading to a broadband solution. Because we are dealing with the elastic wave equation and not a linearized data model in terms of primary reflections, the inversion solves directly for the parameters defining the wave equation: the compressibility (1/bulk modulus) and the shear compliance (1/shear modulus). These parameters are much more directly representative for hydrocarbon saturation, porosity, and lithology, than derived properties such as acoustic and shear impedance that logically follow from the linearized reflectivity model. Because of the strongly nonlinear character of time-lapse effects, wave-equation based AVO inversion is particularly suitable for time-lapse inversion. Our method is presented and illustrated with some synthetic data and three real data case studies.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Gisolf ◽  
P. Doulgeris ◽  
M. Zhang ◽  
A. Droujinina ◽  
P. Haffinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document