scholarly journals Group B Streptococcus Recto-Vaginal Colonization in Near-Term Pregnant Women, Southwest Ethiopia

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Woubishet Girma ◽  
Nadia Yimer ◽  
Tesfaye Kassa ◽  
Elias Yesuf
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Group B Streptococcus ◽  
Susceptibility Pattern ◽  
Southwest Ethiopia ◽  
Vaginal Colonization ◽  
History Of ◽  
Near Term ◽  
Group B

BACKGROUND: Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is recognized as an important cause of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Maternal vaginal carriage of GBS (Streptococcus agalactiae) can lead to vertical transmission to the neonate at the time of delivery. However, little is known about its prevalence, predictors and antibiotic susceptibility pattern in Jimma, Ethiopia. This study assessed the prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility pattern and determinants of GBS recto-vaginal colonization among near-term pregnant women.METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted from May to August 2015 at Jimma University Medical Centre in Southwest Ethiopia. Data through questionnaire and GBS isolates from vaginal and rectal swabs were collected. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed.RESULTS: The overall prevalence of GBS colonization among near term pregnant women (35-37 weeks) was 16.3% (22/135). The majority of GBS isolates were sensitive to Ampicillin and Penicillin G with 95.5% and 90.1%, respectively. Erythromycin and clindamycin were resisted by 50% and 40.9% of the isolates, respectively, whereas gentamicin was resisted by all isolates. GBS colonization was significantly associated with a history of preterm delivery (PTD) (AOR: 6.3, 95% CI: 1.42, 28.3) and history of urinary tract infection (UTI) during current pregnancy (AOR: 6.4, 95% CI, 1.95, 21.1).CONCLUSION: Our study indicated that one among six near-term pregnant women had recto-vaginal GBS colonization. In places where universal screening is not feasible, selective screening for factors particularly history of PTD and UTI during current pregnancy may be a reasonable option. Antibiotic susceptibility testing should be performed while using Erythromycin, Clindamycin or Gentamicin. 

scholarly journals Prevalence of Group B Streptococcus Colonization in Pregnant Women in Jiangsu, East China

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Wang ◽  
Hongmei Qiu ◽  
Ge Yanmei ◽  
Fei Pan ◽  
Shuhui Bian
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Neonatal Sepsis ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Bacterial Culture ◽  
Group B Streptococcus ◽  
East China ◽  
Age Group ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background : Group B streptococcus (GBS) is the leading cause of early-onset neonatal sepsis. This study assessed the prevalence of GBS colonization among pregnant women in Jiangsu, East China. Methods: A total of 16,184 pregnant women at 34 to 37 weeks , gestation aged 16–47 years were recruited from Nanjing Kingmed Diagnostics, including 9022 pregnant women who received GBS screening by PCR detection and 7162 by bacterial culture, antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed on GBS positive samples. Results: The overall GBS prevalence was 8.7% for pregnant women studied by PCR and 3.5% by culture. The 25-29 age group had the highest rate of GBS colonization in the pregnant women. The prevalence of resistance to erythromycin, clindamycin and levofloxacin was 77.5%, 68.3% and 52.2%, respectively. Conclusions: This study revealed the prevalence characteristics of GBS in pregnant women and the difference of GBS colonization between culture and PCR in Jiangsu province.

scholarly journals Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of group B streptococcal isolates from maternal genital tract

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 2738
Author(s):  
Vijayan Sharmila ◽  
Thirunavukkarasu Arun Babu
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Antibiotic Susceptibility ◽  
Group B Streptococcus ◽  
Antibiotic Sensitivity ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Susceptibility Pattern ◽  
Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern ◽  
Sensitivity Pattern ◽  
Prevention And Treatment ◽  
Group B

Background: Group B streptococcus (GBS) is one of the important cause of early onset neonatal sepsis in developed countries leading to increased neonatal morbidity and mortality. Penicillin and Ampicillin are the drugs of choice for prevention of GBS infections. Antibiotic resistance amongst GBS isolates is an emerging health problem affecting neonates. Hence, this study was performed to determine the antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Group B Streptococcus (GBS) in a population of pregnant women.Methods: A prospective study was done to screen pregnant women for vaginal and rectal GBS colonization during their regular visits to antenatal clinic. Todd-Hewitt broth, an enrichment medium for GBS was used for isolation. The antibiotic susceptibility pattern of the isolates were studied.  Results: A total of 300 pregnant women were screened for GBS colonization. GBS colonization rate in our study was 2.3%. The antibiotic susceptibility pattern of the isolates revealed that none of the isolates were resistant to penicillin or clindamycin, while resistance was noted to erythromycin (14.3%) and   tetracycline (71.4%).Conclusions: GBS continues to remain sensitive to Penicillin which is the drug of choice for prevention and treatment of GBS.  Consistent surveillance of antibiotic sensitivity pattern of GBS as well as for other organisms implicated in new born sepsis and maternal infections is required to formulate guidelines for prevention and treatment.

scholarly journals Role of PCR in Rapid Detection Group B Streptococcus in Pregnant Females in Al-Quwayiyah General Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

2021 ◽  
pp. 45-52
Author(s):  
E. S. Khater ◽  
A. S. Abdel-Motaal
Keyword(s):  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
General Hospital ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Group B Streptococcus ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Pregnant Females ◽  
Group B

Background: Group B streptococcus is one of the most common causes of severe neonatal infections. Aim: To detect the prevalence of group B. Streptococcus and their antimicrobial susceptibility and to assess the role of PCR as a rapid method of its detection. Place and Duration of the Study: A cross sectional and prospective cohort study was carried out from September 2019 to February 2020 in Gynaecology and Obstetrics OPD and inpatient units in Al- Quwayiyah General hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Methodology: Paired rectal/vaginal specimens were collected from 540 pregnant females with gestational age 35 or more, Each swab was inoculated into selective medium, Todd Hewitt, One swab is streaked onto blood agar plates incubated in 5% CO2 for 24h at 36ºC. β-hemolytic colonies growth is identified by Gram’s stain, colony morphology and CAMP test. The confirmation and antimicrobial susceptibility were done by Vitek II machine, The second swab was used for PCR to identify atr gene. Results: Out of 540 pregnant women 87 (16.1%) were colonized with GBS isolates. The positive GBS women aged 25 (22-34) and negative GBS women aged 23 (24-35) with no statistical difference. Patients aged more than 35 years old has the higher rate of positive GBS, 46.2%. No significant association detected between GBS and gestational age at delivery, antenatal visits, BMI and gravidity. The GBS strains isolated from pregnant women was 100% susceptible to linezolid and vancomycin followed by ampicillin (93.1%) and tobramicin (83.9%) then gentamicin (81.6%) and levofloxacin(78.2%) and showed least antibiotic susceptibility to erythromycin (26.4%). The PCR was positive in 145 (26.9%). Using culture as gold method, PCR sensitivity was 100% (95% CI: 91.62-100), while specificity was 83.2% (95% CI: 82.61-91.02). Negative and positive predictive values were 100% and 61% respectively. Kappa between the two methods was 0.71, which indicate major agreement. Conclusion: The GBS prevalence among the pregnant females in Al Quwayiyah General Hospital was 16.1%. Detection of GBS using new PCR technique was found to have high sensitivity and faster results, allowing efficient management of GBS and reduction in newborn morbidity and mortality however the cost is high for some laboratories. Further studies should be assessed to be both low cost and accurate rapid screening.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document