scholarly journals The Impact of an Evidence-Based Multi-component Intervention on Colorectal Cancer Screening in Primary Care at a Healthcare System

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Ahnnya Slaughter
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Screening ◽  
Healthcare System ◽  
The United States ◽  
The Body ◽  
Average Risk ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
The Impact

Practice Problem: Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States; many of the deaths are preventable with early detection. Adherence rates for colorectal cancer screening with fecal immunochemical test kits (FIT) was below the national benchmark at this facility. PICOT: The PICOT question that guided this project was: Among veterans 50 – 75 years old requiring average risk colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) seen in primary care at a veterans affairs healthcare system facility (P), how does the use of a multi-component intervention (I), compared to the usual care (C), affect the number of patients completing CRCS (O) over a period of 12 weeks (T)? Evidence: Review of high-quality studies suggested a multi-component approach, including increasing provider awareness and increasing patient education and outreach, as the most effective approach to increase colorectal screening compliance. Intervention: The multi-component intervention included a standardized CRCS nurse navigation process through standard work which included the teach-back method, patient outreach, and provider feedback. Outcome: There were clinically significant improvements in adherence with returned FIT kits, follow up for abnormal FIT kits, and statistically significant improvements with nursing documentation of patient teaching. The number of patients overdue for CRCS decreased. Conclusion: The multi-component CRCS screening intervention demonstrated significant improvements in the intervention clinics which is consistent with the body of evidence.

scholarly journals Colorectal Cancer Screening

2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 196-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Diaz ◽  
Teresa Slomka
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Screening ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
The United States ◽  
Average Risk ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Screening Guidelines ◽  
Emerging Issues

Although colorectal cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States, the burden of this disease could be dramatically reduced by increased utilization of screening. Evidence-based recommendations and guidelines from national societies recommend screening all average risk adults starting at age 50 years. However, the myriad screening options and slight differences in screening recommendations between guidelines may lead to confusion among patients and their primary care providers. In addition, varied colorectal cancer incidence and screening rates among different racial/ethnic groups, inconsistent screening recommendations based on family history and/or age, and increasing awareness of the role of nonadenomatous and nonpolypoid lesions also pose potential challenges to primary care providers when counseling patients. The goal of this review, therefore, is to briefly summarize the colorectal cancer screening guidelines issued by 3 major organizations, compare their recommendations, and address emerging issues in colorectal cancer screening.

scholarly journals Development of a multilevel intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening in Appalachia

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron J. Kruse-Diehr ◽  
Jill M. Oliveri ◽  
Robin C. Vanderpool ◽  
Mira L. Katz ◽  
Paul L. Reiter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Screening ◽  
The United States ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Community Advisory Board ◽  
Primary Care Clinics ◽  
Crc Screening ◽  
Multilevel Intervention

Abstract Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates are lower in Appalachian regions of the United States than in non-Appalachian regions. Given the availability of various screening modalities, there is critical need for culturally relevant interventions addressing multiple socioecological levels to reduce the regional CRC burden. In this report, we describe the development and baseline findings from year 1 of “Accelerating Colorectal Cancer Screening through Implementation Science (ACCSIS) in Appalachia,” a 5-year, National Cancer Institute Cancer MoonshotSM-funded multilevel intervention (MLI) project to increase screening in Appalachian Kentucky and Ohio primary care clinics. Methods Project development was theory-driven and included the establishment of both an external Scientific Advisory Board and a Community Advisory Board to provide guidance in conducting formative activities in two Appalachian counties: one in Kentucky and one in Ohio. Activities included identifying and describing the study communities and primary care clinics, selecting appropriate evidence-based interventions (EBIs), and conducting a pilot test of MLI strategies addressing patient, provider, clinic, and community needs. Results Key informant interviews identified multiple barriers to CRC screening, including fear of screening, test results, and financial concerns (patient level); lack of time and competing priorities (provider level); lack of reminder or tracking systems and staff burden (clinic level); and cultural issues, societal norms, and transportation (community level). With this information, investigators then offered clinics a menu of EBIs and strategies to address barriers at each level. Clinics selected individually tailored MLIs, including improvement of patient education materials, provision of provider education (resulting in increased knowledge, p = .003), enhancement of electronic health record (EHR) systems and development of clinic screening protocols, and implementation of community CRC awareness events, all of which promoted stool-based screening (i.e., FIT or FIT-DNA). Variability among clinics, including differences in EHR systems, was the most salient barrier to EBI implementation, particularly in terms of tracking follow-up of positive screening results, whereas the development of clinic-wide screening protocols was found to promote fidelity to EBI components. Conclusions Lessons learned from year 1 included increased recognition of variability among the clinics and how they function, appreciation for clinic staff and provider workload, and development of strategies to utilize EHR systems. These findings necessitated a modification of study design for subsequent years. Trial registration Trial NCT04427527 is registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov and was registered on June 11, 2020.

The Impact of Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Veteran Hospital Population

2013 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 296-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Trombold ◽  
Russellw Farmer ◽  
Michael McCafferty
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Screening ◽  
Operative Mortality ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
The United States ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Colon And Rectal Cancer ◽  
The Impact

Colon and rectal cancer is the second most common cause of cancer death in the United States. Screening effectively decreases colorectal cancer mortality. This study aims to evaluate the impact of colorectal cancer screening within a Veterans Affairs Medical Center and treatment outcomes. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for a retrospective analysis of all colorectal cancer cases that were identified through the Tumor Registry of the Robley Rex VA Medical Center from 2000 to 2009. Data collected included age at diagnosis, race, risk factors, diagnosis by screening versus symptomatic evaluation, screening test, tumor location and stage, operation performed, operative mortality, and survival. A value of P < 0.05 on Fisher's exact, χ2, analysis of variance, or Cox regression analyses was considered significant. Three hundred fifty-four patients with colorectal cancer (255 colon, 99 rectal) were identified. One hundred twenty-one patients (34%) were diagnosed by screening. In comparison with those diagnosed by symptom evaluation (n = 233), these patients had earlier stage cancers, were more likely to have a curative intent procedure, and had improved 5-year survival rates. Older patients (older than 75 years old) were more likely to present with symptoms. High-risk patients were more likely to have colonoscopic screening than fecal occult blood testing. More blacks had Stage IV disease than nonblacks. Curative intent 30-day operative mortality was 2.1 per cent for colectomy and 0 per cent for rectal resection. Screening for colorectal cancer in the veteran population allows for better survival, detection at an earlier stage, and higher likelihood of resection.

The impact of cultural characteristics on colorectal cancer screening adherence among Filipinos in the United States: a pilot study

2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 862-870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rizaldy R. Ferrer ◽  
Marizen Ramirez ◽  
Linda J. Beckman ◽  
Leda L. Danao ◽  
Kimlin T. Ashing-Giwa
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
United States ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Screening ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cultural Characteristics ◽  
Screening Adherence ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Development of a Multilevel Intervention to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in Appalachia

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron J. Kruse-Diehr ◽  
Jill M. Oliveri ◽  
Robin C. Vanderpool ◽  
Mira L. Katz ◽  
Paul L. Reiter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Screening ◽  
The United States ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Community Advisory Board ◽  
Primary Care Clinics ◽  
Crc Screening ◽  
Multilevel Intervention

Abstract Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates are lower in Appalachian regions of the United States than in non-Appalachian regions. Given the availability of various screening modalities, there is critical need for culturally relevant interventions addressing multiple socioecological levels to reduce the regional CRC burden. In this report, we describe the development and baseline findings from Year One of ‘Accelerating Colorectal Cancer Screening through Implementation Science (ACCSIS) in Appalachia,’ a five-year, National Cancer Institute Cancer MoonshotSM-funded multilevel intervention (MLI) project to increase screening in Appalachian Kentucky and Ohio primary care clinics.Methods: Project development was theory-driven and included the establishment of both an external Scientific Advisory Board and a Community Advisory Board to provide guidance in conducting formative activities in two Appalachian counties: one in Kentucky and one in Ohio. Activities included identifying and describing the study communities and primary care clinics, selecting appropriate evidence-based interventions (EBIs), and conducting a pilot test of MLI strategies addressing patient, provider, clinic, and community needs. Results: Key informant interviews identified multiple barriers to CRC screening, including fear of screening , test results, and financial concerns (patient-level); lack of time and competing priorities (provider-level); lack of reminder or tracking systems and staff burden (clinic-level); and cultural issues, societal norms, and transportation (community-level). With this information, investigators then offered clinics a menu of EBIs and strategies to address barriers at each level. Clinics selected individually tailored MLIs, including improvement of patient education materials, provision of provider education (resulting in increased knowledge, p = .003), enhancement of electronic health record (EHR) systems and development of clinic screening protocols, and implementation of community CRC awareness events. Conclusions: Lessons learned from Year One included increased recognition of variability among the clinics and how they function, appreciation for clinic staff and provider workload, and development of strategies to utilize EHR systems. These findings necessitated a modification of study design for subsequent years.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document