The Impact of Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Veteran Hospital Population

2013 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 296-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Trombold ◽  
Russellw Farmer ◽  
Michael McCafferty

Colon and rectal cancer is the second most common cause of cancer death in the United States. Screening effectively decreases colorectal cancer mortality. This study aims to evaluate the impact of colorectal cancer screening within a Veterans Affairs Medical Center and treatment outcomes. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for a retrospective analysis of all colorectal cancer cases that were identified through the Tumor Registry of the Robley Rex VA Medical Center from 2000 to 2009. Data collected included age at diagnosis, race, risk factors, diagnosis by screening versus symptomatic evaluation, screening test, tumor location and stage, operation performed, operative mortality, and survival. A value of P < 0.05 on Fisher's exact, χ2, analysis of variance, or Cox regression analyses was considered significant. Three hundred fifty-four patients with colorectal cancer (255 colon, 99 rectal) were identified. One hundred twenty-one patients (34%) were diagnosed by screening. In comparison with those diagnosed by symptom evaluation (n = 233), these patients had earlier stage cancers, were more likely to have a curative intent procedure, and had improved 5-year survival rates. Older patients (older than 75 years old) were more likely to present with symptoms. High-risk patients were more likely to have colonoscopic screening than fecal occult blood testing. More blacks had Stage IV disease than nonblacks. Curative intent 30-day operative mortality was 2.1 per cent for colectomy and 0 per cent for rectal resection. Screening for colorectal cancer in the veteran population allows for better survival, detection at an earlier stage, and higher likelihood of resection.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 254-254
Author(s):  
Robert B. Hines ◽  
Alina Barrett ◽  
Philip Twumasi-Ankrah ◽  
Dominique Broccoli ◽  
Kimberly K. Engelman ◽  
...  

254 Background: We investigated the effect of comorbidity, age, health insurance payer status, and race on the risk of nonadherence with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) treatment guidelines for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. In addition, the prognostic impact of NCCN treatment nonadherence on survival was assessed. Methods: Colon and rectal cancer patients who received primary treatment at Memorial University Medical Center in Savannah, GA from 2003 to 2010 were eligible for this study (final N = 679). Modified Poisson regression was used to obtain risk ratios for the outcome of nonadherence with NCCN treatment guidelines. Hazard ratios (HRs) for the relative risk of CRC-related death were obtained by Cox regression. Results: Guideline-adherent treatment was received by 82.5% of patients. Moderate/severe comorbidity, being uninsured, having rectal cancer, older age, and increasing tumor stage were associated with increased risks of receiving nonadherent treatment. Treatment nonadherence was associated with 4.5 times the risk of CRC-related death (HR, 4.53; 95% CI, 2.56-8.00) in the first year following diagnosis and 2.0 times the risk of death (HR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.20-3.25) in years 2 to 5. The detrimental effect of nonadherence was demonstrated across all levels of comorbidity and age. Conclusions: Although there are medically justifiable reasons to deviate from NCCN treatment guidelines in CRC patients, patients who received nonadherent treatment had much higher risks of CRC-related death, especially in the first year following diagnosis. This study’s results highlight the importance of cancer health services research to drive quality improvement efforts in cancer care for CRC patients. [Table: see text]


2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 862-870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rizaldy R. Ferrer ◽  
Marizen Ramirez ◽  
Linda J. Beckman ◽  
Leda L. Danao ◽  
Kimlin T. Ashing-Giwa

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Ahnnya Slaughter

Practice Problem: Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States; many of the deaths are preventable with early detection. Adherence rates for colorectal cancer screening with fecal immunochemical test kits (FIT) was below the national benchmark at this facility. PICOT: The PICOT question that guided this project was: Among veterans 50 – 75 years old requiring average risk colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) seen in primary care at a veterans affairs healthcare system facility (P), how does the use of a multi-component intervention (I), compared to the usual care (C), affect the number of patients completing CRCS (O) over a period of 12 weeks (T)? Evidence: Review of high-quality studies suggested a multi-component approach, including increasing provider awareness and increasing patient education and outreach, as the most effective approach to increase colorectal screening compliance. Intervention: The multi-component intervention included a standardized CRCS nurse navigation process through standard work which included the teach-back method, patient outreach, and provider feedback. Outcome: There were clinically significant improvements in adherence with returned FIT kits, follow up for abnormal FIT kits, and statistically significant improvements with nursing documentation of patient teaching. The number of patients overdue for CRCS decreased. Conclusion: The multi-component CRCS screening intervention demonstrated significant improvements in the intervention clinics which is consistent with the body of evidence.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 1129
Author(s):  
Audrius Dulskas ◽  
Tomas Poskus ◽  
Inga Kildusiene ◽  
Ausvydas Patasius ◽  
Rokas Stulpinas ◽  
...  

We aimed to report the results of the implementation of the National Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Program covering all the country. The National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) reimburses the institutions for performing each service; each procedure within the program has its own administrative code. Information about services provided within the program was retrieved from the database of NHIF starting from the 1 January 2014 to the 31 December 2018. Exact date and type of all provided services, test results, date and results of biopsy and histopathological examination were extracted together with the vital status at the end of follow-up, date of death and date of emigration when applicable for all men and women born between 1935 and 1968. Results were compared with the guidelines of the European Union for quality assurance in CRC screening and diagnosis. The screening uptake was 49.5% (754,061 patients) during study period. Participation rate varied from 16% to 18.1% per year and was higher among women than among men. Proportion of test-positive and test-negative results was similar during all the study period—8.7% and 91.3% annually. Between 9.2% and 13.5% of test-positive patients received a biopsy of which 52.3–61.8% were positive for colorectal adenoma and 4.6–7.3% for colorectal carcinoma. CRC detection rate among test-positive individuals varied between 0.93% and 1.28%. The colorectal cancer screening program in Lithuania coverage must be improved. A screening database is needed to systematically evaluate the impact and performance of the national CRC screening program and quality assurance within the program.


2021 ◽  
Vol 124 (9) ◽  
pp. 1516-1523
Author(s):  
Lindy M. Kregting ◽  
Sylvia Kaljouw ◽  
Lucie de Jonge ◽  
Erik E. L. Jansen ◽  
Elleke F. P. Peterse ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Many breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening programmes were disrupted due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to estimate the effects of five restart strategies after the disruption on required screening capacity and cancer burden. Methods Microsimulation models simulated five restart strategies for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. The models estimated required screening capacity, cancer incidence, and cancer-specific mortality after a disruption of 6 months. The restart strategies varied in whether screens were caught up or not and, if so, immediately or delayed, and whether the upper age limit was increased. Results The disruption in screening programmes without catch-up of missed screens led to an increase of 2.0, 0.3, and 2.5 cancer deaths per 100 000 individuals in 10 years in breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer, respectively. Immediately catching-up missed screens minimised the impact of the disruption but required a surge in screening capacity. Delaying screening, but still offering all screening rounds gave the best balance between required capacity, incidence, and mortality. Conclusions Strategies with the smallest loss in health effects were also the most burdensome for the screening organisations. Which strategy is preferred depends on the organisation and available capacity in a country.


2017 ◽  
Vol 152 (5) ◽  
pp. S551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gloria Lan ◽  
Michael Ma ◽  
David Schwarzbaum ◽  
Lionel S. D'Souza ◽  
Brett B. Bernstein

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document