Objectives: International guidelines recommend the use of autogenous vascular access. Where suitable superficial veins are unavailable deeper veins may be used as an option. In most cases, basilic veins are used when cephalic veins are unavailable; arteriovenous fistulas using the brachial vein from the deep venous network are rare. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to conduct a systematic review of the available literature evaluating the use of the brachial vein in arteriovenous fistulas. Methods: Systematic literature search of electronic databases in accordance with PRISMA was conducted. The primary outcomes of this study were primary and secondary patency rates for brachial vein arteriovenous fistulas; the secondary outcomes were the rates of access thrombosis, steal syndrome, pseudo-aneurysm and infection. Results: The 1-year primary, assisted, and secondary patency was recorded at (24%–77%), (45%–85%) and (45%–96%), respectively. The 2-year primary, assisted and secondary patency rate was recorded at (12%–46%), (19%–75%) and (19%–92%), respectively. However, the consistency regarding the reports and definitions used were highly variable. The incidence rate of infection, thrombosis and steal syndrome was 5% (0%–12%), 15.9% (9.5%–35%) and 3% (2%–6%), respectively. Conclusion: Available studies support the use of brachial veins as a reliable access option in patients with non-accessible superficial veins where an autologous option is required.
Radial Artery Access Is a Safe Alternative to Brachial Artery and Femoral Artery Access for Endovascular Lower Extremity Peripheral Arterial Disease