scholarly journals The Effect of Strategy Instruction on the Frequency of Reading Strategy Use by Iranian EFL Learners

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Naser Ghafoori ◽  
Hedayat Eslami ◽  
Leyli Bagheri
Keyword(s):  
Strategy Instruction ◽  
Reading Strategy ◽  
Strategy Use ◽  
Efl Learners

scholarly journals The Effects of Collaborative and Non- Collaborative Approaches to Teaching Reading Strategies on Iranian efl Learners’ Reading Comprehension and Attitude toward Reading

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-73
Author(s):  
Azadeh Rajaei ◽  
Seyed Hassan Talebi ◽  
Shirin Abadikhah
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Reading Strategies ◽  
Strategy Instruction ◽  
Reading Strategy ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Teaching Reading ◽  
Efl Learners ◽  
Reading Strategy Instruction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Experimental Group

In an EFL context reading is a very important skill in language learning. This study aims at finding if instruction of reading strategies in two different collaborative and non-collaborative approaches affects reading comprehension and attitude toward reading differently. Forty-five Iranian adult female EFL learners at pre-intermediate general English proficiency level in Iran Language Institute (ili) were selected and divided into three groups of 15 students. One group functioning as the control group did not receive any strategy instruction; the second group, as the first experimental group, received reading strategy instruction in collaborative groups (Collaborative Strategic Reading or csr), and the third group considered as the second experimental group received reading strategy instruction in a non-collaborative way. A reading comprehension test and a reading attitude questionnaire were given to all three groups at the beginning of the term as pretests and after the experiment as posttests. The results obtained through one-way anova indicated that though both experimental groups outperformed the control group, there was no significant difference between the two experimental groups in reading comprehension and attitude toward reading. Therefore, it is up to teachers to weigh the advantages of using the collaborative approach to teaching reading against its disadvantages.

scholarly journals Iranian EFL Learners’ Achievement Goals in Relation with Their Metacognitive Reading Strategy Use

2011 ◽  
Vol 01 (02) ◽  
pp. 39-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahtab Mohammadi Ghavam ◽  
Mina Rastegar ◽  
Mohammad Hasan Razmi
Keyword(s):  
Achievement Goals ◽  
Reading Strategy ◽  
Strategy Use ◽  
Efl Learners

Exploring strong and weak EFL readers’ strategy use after a reading strategy and extensive reading instructional intervention

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 345-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying-Chun Shih ◽  
Barry Lee Reynolds
Keyword(s):  
Reading Instruction ◽  
English Language ◽  
Strategy Instruction ◽  
Junior College ◽  
Reading Strategy ◽  
Strategy Use ◽  
Strategy Training ◽  
Extensive Reading ◽  
Verbal Reports ◽  
Language Class

Abstract After 16 weeks of extensive reading and reading strategy instruction in an English as a Foreign Language class (n = 52) at a junior college in Taiwan, three weak and three strong second language readers were recruited to investigate reading strategy use. Strategies were inferred from verbal reports gained through a think aloud methodology as participants read a text equivalent to those encountered during regular classroom instruction. Results indicated strong readers used more global strategies than weak readers. Strong readers had a more diverse reading strategy repertoire while weak readers tended to lean towards the use of a single strategy. In addition, strong readers tended to combine strategies. These and other results are discussed in terms of the translation-based reading instruction currently dominating Taiwanese secondary school classrooms. Suggestions are also provided on how classroom English teachers should implement reading strategy training in the English language classroom.

scholarly journals The Relationship between Reading Strategy Use and EFL Test Performance

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 39-52
Author(s):  
Saraswati Dawadi
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Language ◽  
Test Performance ◽  
Reading Strategies ◽  
Cognitive Strategies ◽  
Reading Strategy ◽  
Strategy Use ◽  
Reading Test ◽  
Efl Learners ◽  
English Reading ◽  
The Relationship

There has been a steady interest in investigating the relationship between strategy use and English as a foreign language (EFL) test performance. Despite numerous studies on strategy use, the relationship between the two is still not clear. This paper reports on a study that investigated the use of reading strategies in the Secondary Education Examination English reading test and the relationship between reading strategy use and the test performance. A sample of 312 EFL learners studying at Grade 10 in Nepal participated in this study. They were asked to take the test and then respond to a reading strategy questionnaire. The quantitative software SPSS (version 20) was used to analyze the data. The results indicated that participants were active strategy users, and they used cognitive strategies more frequently than metacognitive strategies. A significant relationship was identified between reading strategy use and EFL proficiency; high-proficiency learners reported significantly higher use of reading strategies than moderate-proficiency learners, who in turn reported higher use of those strategies than their low-proficiency peers. Implications of these findings for EFL teaching and recommendations for further research are discussed.Journal of NELTA ,  Vol. 22, No. 1-2, 2017 December, Page: 39-52

scholarly journals Scrutinizing EFL learners' online reading strategy use across proficiency levels

XLinguae ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 190-200
Author(s):  
Merliyani Putri Anggraini ◽  
Bambang Yudi Cahyono
Keyword(s):  
Reading Achievement ◽  
English Proficiency ◽  
Reading Strategy ◽  
Strategy Use ◽  
Online Reading ◽  
Efl Learners ◽  
Proficiency Levels ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Spearman Test ◽  
The Relationship

This study aimed at investigating the difference in online reading strategy use between EFL students with high and low English proficiency level and knowing the relationship between online strategy use and reading comprehension. Ninety-six university students were involved in this research, and they were distributed into two groups; high and low proficiency levels based on English proficiency test scores. SORS was administered to collect the data after completing three reading sessions. Analyses of the data, using the Chi-square test to see the differences and the Spearman test, to check the relationship between strategy use and reading achievement. The results showed that the reading strategy that was most frequently used by the EFL learners was a problem-solving strategy, and the least frequently used one was a socio-affective strategy. Additionally, there was no significant difference in the online reading strategy use between students in high and low proficiency levels. Therefore, there was a negative relationship between strategy use and reading achievement. The more strategies they used, the lower score they got.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document