Implementing the “Professional Standards For Teaching Mathematics”: Questioning in the Mathematics Classroom

1993 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 88-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Nesbitt Vacc

For many of us, implementing the Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics (NCTM 1991) in our classrooms makes great sense. It is clearly reasonable that if students are to develop an understanding of and an ability to use mathematical applications in a variety of contexts (NCTM 1989). they should have meaningful and relevant experiences that will actively engage them in constructing their own knowledge. Also, that active engagement needs to be accompanied by opportunities for students to talk about what they already know and don't know and what they are doing as they strive to extend or change their current level of understanding. For many teachers, however. offering this type of instruction means changing their beliefs about mathematics instruction. After all, most of us are products of elementary and secondary school classrooms in which the teachers told us what we needed to know or do and we listened to and did what they told us to do. What we were thinking about during this interaction often did not matter, and we were unaware that it should. This same type of discourse existed in many of our methods courses. The instructor spent most of the class telling us what we needed to know so that we could tell our future students what they needed to know. Fortunately, we have come to the realization that this style of teaching is not as effective as once thought, and consequently we need to change what we are doing. However, how we go about making needed changes in our teaching is unclear.

1993 ◽  
Vol 86 (9) ◽  
pp. 744-747
Author(s):  
Mary Kim Prichard

This assumption that how teachers teach mathematics is fundamentally connected with how they learned it underlies the first standard of the “Standards for the Professional Development of Teachers of Mathematics.” This standard, Experiencing Good Mathematics Teaching, focuses on the role of the college and university mathematics professors in the process of reforming school mathematics teaching. It is essential that mathematics teacher educators invite and encourage college-level mathematics faculty to join them in implementing the teaching standards. The NCTM's Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (1989) and Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics (1991) present a new vision of school mathematics. Mathematics courses and programs of study in colleges and universities should share in this vision.


1995 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 442-449
Author(s):  
Margaret Schwan Smith ◽  
Edward A. Silver

Current reform efforts have emphasized the need to change the way that mathematics is taught and learned so that all students have access to a mathematics education rich in opportunities for thinking, reasoning, and problem solving. Reaching all students may not be easy, however, since students in a mathematics classroom may be considerably diverse, not only with respect to prior mathematics achievement but also with respect to ethnicity, language, and life expelience. The challenge is even greater because teachers often do not share the ethnicity, primary language, or life experiences of the children they teach. The Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM 1989) and the Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics (NCTM 1991) urge teachers to consider classroom diversity by-


1999 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 226-246
Author(s):  
Denise S. Mewborn ◽  
Patricia D. Huberty

The Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics (NCTM 1991, 3) calls for five changes in the environment of the mathematics classroom.


1999 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 216-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Azita Manouchehri ◽  
Mary C. Enderson

The NCTM's Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics (1991) has directed attention to “discourse” in the mathematics classroom. This document recommends that mathematics instruction should promote students' discourse by orchestrating situations in which each individual's thinking is challenged and by asking students to clarify and justify ideas. “Discourse,” as described by the Standards document, highlights the way in which knowledge is constructed and exchanged in the classroom (Ball 1992). Teaching mathematics from the perspective of developing mathematical discourse requires building a new vision for mathematics classrooms and poses a major challenge for mathematics teachers at all levels. This challenge was recognized by D'Ambrosio (1995). She identified the need to build environments in which students construct a “personal relationship” with mathematics as one of the most important requirements for promoting and sustaining the type of discourse envisioned by the reform movement. In such environments, students engage in authentic mathematical inquiry; act like mathematicians as they explore ideas and concepts; and negotiate the meanings of, and the connections among, those ideas with others in class (D'Ambrosio 1995).


1995 ◽  
Vol 88 (5) ◽  
pp. 420-425
Author(s):  
Mark Driscoll

I can thank a student named Billy for teaching me about the importance of integrating assessment with instruction. It was the early 1970s, and I was teaching in an alternative high school that I had helped found the year before, in a converted warehouse in central St. Louis. Our students were drawn from the city's school-dropout population, and many had not been in a mathematics classroom for years. Luckily, our classes were relatively small, which permitted me on this day to reflect on what Billy had done on a task. I had put five decimals, all between 0 and 1, on the chalkboard and asked the class to rank them in order of number size—a list something Like .06, .607, .6, .6707, .067. Billy anayed them in descending order of length, longest to shortest. I asked, “Which is the number with the smallest value, Billy?” He pointed without hesitation to .6707. “How come?” I asked. This time, Billy thought a bit and seemed to be looking at what he had done through the mists of school memory. “I don“t know. I sort of remember one of my teachers saying, ‘The farther out you go in a decimal, the smaller the number.’”


Author(s):  
Milan Sherman ◽  
Carolyn McCaffrey James ◽  
Amy Hillen ◽  
Charity Cayton

This case provides readers with an opportunity to consider issues pertaining to the use of instructional technologies in the mathematics classroom. As a narrative case based on a lesson observed in a real classroom, the case reflects the complexities of this context, yet was written to highlight certain themes relevant to teaching mathematics with technology. In particular, how students use dynamic geometry software to explore mathematical relationships, how they engage with the Standards for Mathematical Practice, and the important role of the teacher in this process are prominent themes in the lesson.


Author(s):  
Jenny Missen

The Australian Curriculum (AC) provides teachers with a great amount of detail in each curriculum area. In addition to teaching these curricula, the AC requires incorporation of Cross-Curriculum Priorities and General Capabilities. This paper documents the work done on an action research project considering ways in which the General Capabilities (GCs) of the Australian Curriculum could be incorporated into teaching Mathematics and the difficulties I faced as a teacher researching during the teaching term.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document