scholarly journals Impact of Trade Liberalization on Indonesian Export to South Korea, Japan, and China

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Silva Nur Rizha Fajriyanti ◽  
Rossanto Dwi Handoyo ◽  
Abdul Rahim Ridzuan ◽  
Mohamad Idham Md Razak
Keyword(s):  
South Korea ◽  
Trade Liberalization ◽  
Japan And China

New Product Creativity Antecedents and Consequences: Evidence from South Korea, Japan, and China

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 939-959 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheryl Nakata ◽  
Gaia Rubera ◽  
Subin Im ◽  
Jae H. Pae ◽  
Hyun Jung Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
South Korea ◽  
New Product ◽  
Antecedents And Consequences ◽  
Product Creativity ◽  
Japan And China

Do Imports Increase Unemployment? Empirical Estimates That Are Not Model Dependent

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 447-469
Author(s):  
Jonathan E. Leightner ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Czech Republic ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Theoretical Model ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
South Korea ◽  
Trade Liberalization ◽  
Empirical Results ◽  
Empirical Estimates ◽  
The Us ◽  
The Uk

Some Ricardian models would predict a fall in unemployment with trade liberalization. In contrast, the Heckscher-Ohlin model (Stolper Samuelson Theorem) would predict trade liberalization would cause a fall in wages for labor scarce countries, resulting in greater unemployment if there are wage rigidities. The choice of which theoretical model is used affects the empirical results obtained. This paper produces estimates of the change in unemployment due to a change in imports that are not model dependent. The estimates produced are total derivatives that capture all the ways that imports and unemployment are correlated. I find that unemployment increases with increased imports for Austria, Greece, Japan, Portugal, South Korea, Slovenia, and Sweden, but that unemployment decreases with increased imports for Australia, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Latvia, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Slovakia, Spain, the UK, and the US.

The Smaller Economies of Pacific Asia and Their Business Systems

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon Redding
Keyword(s):  
Hong Kong ◽  
South Korea ◽  
Business Systems ◽  
Pacific Asia ◽  
Political Structures ◽  
Development Trajectories ◽  
Japan And China ◽  
The Way

What came to be known as the Asian miracle took place in a number of quite varied contexts in countries outside the major states Japan and China, and the way in which these smaller economies have built their development trajectories in the years after 1960 has been a matter of serious attention among policymakers worldwide. Japan and China are given specific attention elsewhere in this volume and so this article considers the rest of Pacific Asia. It aims to outline the systems of business which have come to characterize the following clusters of countries: first, South Korea which stands on its own as a distinct case; second, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Singapore which are essentially Chinese in their ethnic make-up, their current political structures, and their business behaviour, but which nevertheless display great differences among themselves; third, the ASEAN group outside Singapore, again containing variety but with certain key common denominators.

South Korea's Marginal Intra-Industry Trade and the Choice of Preferential Partners

2004 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 94-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun-Hoon Lee ◽  
Chan-Hyun Sohn
Keyword(s):  
South Korea ◽  
Trade Liberalization ◽  
Free Trade ◽  
Free Trade Agreement ◽  
Trade Agreement ◽  
Trade Expansion ◽  
Industry Trade

South Korea recently signed a free trade agreement (FTA) with Chile and is currently negotiating or studying bilateral FTAs with about 20 countries. However, some South Koreans oppose such agreements because they fear that trade liberalization would result in costly factor adjustment. Many researchers believe that intra-industry trade expansion generates smaller inter-industry factor adjustment (and therefore lower costs) compared with the costs associated with inter-industry trade expansion. This paper analyzes the extent and nature of intra-industry trade and marginal intra-industry trade in South Korea, to help predict the relative costs it might face upon opening its markets to various countries.

scholarly journals A Comparative Study on Protected Area Management in South Korea, Japan and China

2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min-Ju Lee ◽  
Gwan-Gyu Lee ◽  
Hyun-Chan Sung ◽  
Dong-Kun Lee ◽  
Hyun-Woo Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
South Korea ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Protected Area ◽  
Protected Area Management ◽  
Japan And China ◽  
Area Management

scholarly journals ANALISIS DAMPAK LIBERALISASI PERDAGANGAN KAWASAN EKONOMI ASIA TERHADAP KINERJA EKONOMI MAKRO ASEAN

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-119
Author(s):  
Ichsan Zulkarnaen ◽  
Rina Oktaviani ◽  
Mangara Tambunan ◽  
Yulius Yulius
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Trade Liberalization ◽  
Main Tool ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Terms Of Trade ◽  
Economic Welfare ◽  
Import Tariff ◽  
Asean Countries ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Japan And China

This research intends to explore the impact of trade liberalization on macroeconomic performances, especially on Indonesia and other ASEAN Countries. The GTAP model is used as the main tool of analysis. The findings show that the benefit of the trade liberalization is still dominated by developed countries such as Japan and China. The elimination of import tariff results an increase in economic growth and economic welfare on all participated countries. It also results in an increase in GDP deflator and terms of trade which meant decreasing competitiveness.  Keywords: Asia trade liberalization, ASEAN countries, GTAP model

An Economic Integration Index for South Korea, Japan, and China

Asia Review ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 307-331
Author(s):  
Soyoung Kim ◽  
Jaeho Jung
Keyword(s):  
South Korea ◽  
Economic Integration ◽  
Japan And China
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document