scholarly journals A sequential multi-target Mps1 phosphorylation cascade promotes spindle checkpoint signaling

eLife ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhejian Ji ◽  
Haishan Gao ◽  
Luying Jia ◽  
Bing Li ◽  
Hongtao Yu
Keyword(s):  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Checkpoint Activation ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Microtubule Attachment ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Phosphorylation Cascade ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint Complex

The master spindle checkpoint kinase Mps1 senses kinetochore-microtubule attachment and promotes checkpoint signaling to ensure accurate chromosome segregation. The kinetochore scaffold Knl1, when phosphorylated by Mps1, recruits checkpoint complexes Bub1–Bub3 and BubR1–Bub3 to unattached kinetochores. Active checkpoint signaling ultimately enhances the assembly of the mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC) consisting of BubR1–Bub3, Mad2, and Cdc20, which inhibits the anaphase-promoting complex or cyclosome bound to Cdc20 (APC/CCdc20) to delay anaphase onset. Using in vitro reconstitution, we show that Mps1 promotes APC/C inhibition by MCC components through phosphorylating Bub1 and Mad1. Phosphorylated Bub1 binds to Mad1–Mad2. Phosphorylated Mad1 directly interacts with Cdc20. Mutations of Mps1 phosphorylation sites in Bub1 or Mad1 abrogate the spindle checkpoint in human cells. Therefore, Mps1 promotes checkpoint activation through sequentially phosphorylating Knl1, Bub1, and Mad1. This sequential multi-target phosphorylation cascade makes the checkpoint highly responsive to Mps1 and to kinetochore-microtubule attachment.

scholarly journals Defining pathways of spindle checkpoint silencing: functional redundancy between Cdc20 ubiquitination and p31comet

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (22) ◽  
pp. 4227-4235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luying Jia ◽  
Bing Li ◽  
Ross T. Warrington ◽  
Xing Hao ◽  
Shixuan Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Functional Redundancy ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Human Cells ◽  
Unresolved Issue ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint Complex

The spindle checkpoint senses unattached or improperly attached kinetochores during mitosis, inhibits the anaphase-promoting complex or cyclosome (APC/C), and delays anaphase onset to prevent aneuploidy. The mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC) consisting of BubR1, Bub3, Mad2, and Cdc20 is a critical APC/C-inhibitory checkpoint complex in human cells. At the metaphase–anaphase transition, the spindle checkpoint turns off, and MCC disassembles to allow anaphase onset. The molecular mechanisms of checkpoint inactivation are poorly understood. A major unresolved issue is the role of Cdc20 autoubiquitination in this process. Although Cdc20 autoubiquitination can promote Mad2 dissociation from Cdc20, a nonubiquitinatable Cdc20 mutant still dissociates from Mad2 during checkpoint inactivation. Here, we show that depletion of p31comet delays Mad2 dissociation from Cdc20 mutants that cannot undergo autoubiquitination. Thus both p31comet and ubiquitination of Cdc20 are critical mechanisms of checkpoint inactivation. They act redundantly to promote Mad2 dissociation from Cdc20.

scholarly journals Systematic Analysis in Caenorhabditis elegans Reveals that the Spindle Checkpoint Is Composed of Two Largely Independent Branches

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 1252-1267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Essex ◽  
Alexander Dammermann ◽  
Lindsay Lewellyn ◽  
Karen Oegema ◽  
Arshad Desai
Keyword(s):  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Activation ◽  
Systematic Analysis ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Epistasis Analysis ◽  
Kinetochore Assembly ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Monopolar Spindle ◽  
Spindle Microtubules

Kinetochores use the spindle checkpoint to delay anaphase onset until all chromosomes have formed bipolar attachments to spindle microtubules. Here, we use controlled monopolar spindle formation to systematically define the requirements for spindle checkpoint signaling in the Caenorhabditis elegans embryo. The results, when interpreted in light of kinetochore assembly epistasis analysis, indicate that checkpoint activation is coordinately directed by the NDC-80 complex, the Rod/Zwilch/Zw10 complex, and BUB-1—three components independently targeted to the outer kinetochore by the scaffold protein KNL-1. These components orchestrate the integration of a core Mad1MDF-1/Mad2MDF-2-based signal, with a largely independent Mad3SAN-1/BUB-3 pathway. Evidence for independence comes from the fact that subtly elevating Mad2MDF-2 levels bypasses the requirement for BUB-3 and Mad3SAN-1 in kinetochore-dependent checkpoint activation. Mad3SAN-1 does not accumulate at unattached kinetochores and BUB-3 kinetochore localization is independent of Mad2MDF-2. We discuss the rationale for a bipartite checkpoint mechanism in which a core Mad1MDF-1/Mad2MDF-2 signal generated at kinetochores is integrated with a separate cytoplasmic Mad3SAN-1/BUB-3–based pathway.

scholarly journals Two Complexes of Spindle Checkpoint Proteins Containing Cdc20 and Mad2 Assemble during Mitosis Independently of the Kinetochore in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2005 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 867-878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atasi Poddar ◽  
P. Todd Stukenberg ◽  
Daniel J. Burke
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Checkpoint Activation ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
In Cells

ABSTRACT Favored models of spindle checkpoint signaling propose that two inhibitory complexes (Mad2-Cdc20 and Mad2-Mad3-Bub3-Cdc20) must be assembled at kinetochores in order to inhibit mitosis. We have directly tested this model in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The proteins Mad2, Mad3, Bub3, Cdc20, and Cdc27 in yeast were quantified, and there are sufficient amounts to form stoichiometric inhibitors of Cdc20 and the anaphase-promoting complex. Mad2 is present in two separate complexes in cells arrested in mitosis with nocodazole. There is a small amount of Mad2-Mad3-Bub3-Cdc20 and a much larger amount of a complex that contains Mad2-Cdc20. We use conditional mutants to show that both Mad2 and Mad3 are essential for establishment and maintenance of the spindle checkpoint. Both spindle checkpoint complexes containing Mad2 form in mitosis, not in response to checkpoint activation. The kinetochore is not required to form either complex. We propose that the conversion of Mad1-Mad2 to Cdc20-Mad2, a key step in generating inhibitory checkpoint complexes, is limited to mitosis by the availability of Cdc20 and is kinetochore independent.

scholarly journals BubR1 recruitment to the kinetochore via Bub1 enhances Spindle Assembly Checkpoint signaling

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anand Banerjee ◽  
Chu Chen ◽  
Lauren Humphrey ◽  
John J. Tyson ◽  
Ajit Joglekar
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Modeling ◽  
Dose Response ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Local Concentration ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Response Characteristics ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint Complex

During mitosis, unattached kinetochores in a dividing cell generate the anaphase-inhibitory Mitotic Checkpoint Complex (MCC) to activate the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint (SAC) and delay anaphase onset. To generate MCC, these kinetochores recruit MCC constituent proteins including the protein BubR1. The increased local concentration of BubR1 resulting from this recruitment should enhance MCC generation, but prior studies found this not to be the case. We analyzed the contribution of two BubR1 recruitment pathways to MCC generation in human kinetochores. For these analyses, we isolated a subset of the MCC generation reactions to the cytosol using ectopic SAC activation systems. These analyses and mathematical modeling show that BubR1 binding to the SAC protein Bub1, but not to the 'KI' motifs in the kinetochore protein Knl1, significantly enhances the rate of Bub1-mediated MCC generation in the kinetochore. Our work also suggests that Bub1-BubR1 stoichiometry will strongly influence the dose-response characteristics of SAC signaling.

scholarly journals Checkpoint inhibition of the APC/C in HeLa cells is mediated by a complex of BUBR1, BUB3, CDC20, and MAD2

2001 ◽  
Vol 154 (5) ◽  
pp. 925-936 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valery Sudakin ◽  
Gordon K.T. Chan ◽  
Tim J. Yen
Keyword(s):  
Hela Cells ◽  
Inhibitory Activity ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligase Activity ◽  
Interphase Cells ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint Complex ◽  
Sustained Inhibition

The mitotic checkpoint prevents cells with unaligned chromosomes from prematurely exiting mitosis by inhibiting the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) from targeting key proteins for ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis. We have examined the mechanism by which the checkpoint inhibits the APC/C by purifying an APC/C inhibitory factor from HeLa cells. We call this factor the mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC) as it consists of hBUBR1, hBUB3, CDC20, and MAD2 checkpoint proteins in near equal stoichiometry. MCC inhibitory activity is 3,000-fold greater than that of recombinant MAD2, which has also been shown to inhibit APC/C in vitro. Surprisingly, MCC is not generated from kinetochores, as it is also present and active in interphase cells. However, only APC/C isolated from mitotic cells was sensitive to inhibition by MCC. We found that the majority of the APC/C in mitotic lysates is associated with the MCC, and this likely contributes to the lag in ubiquitin ligase activity. Importantly, chromosomes can suppress the reactivation of APC/C. Chromosomes did not affect the inhibitory activity of MCC or the stimulatory activity of CDC20. We propose that the preformed interphase pool of MCC allows for rapid inhibition of APC/C when cells enter mitosis. Unattached kinetochores then target the APC/C for sustained inhibition by the MCC.

scholarly journals Bub3 promotes Cdc20-dependent activation of the APC/C in S. cerevisiae

2015 ◽  
Vol 209 (4) ◽  
pp. 519-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Yang ◽  
Dai Tsuchiya ◽  
Soni Lacefield
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Unknown Function ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Mitotic Progression ◽  
Checkpoint Activation ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Impaired Binding

The spindle checkpoint ensures accurate chromosome segregation by sending a signal from an unattached kinetochore to inhibit anaphase onset. Numerous studies have described the role of Bub3 in checkpoint activation, but less is known about its functions apart from the spindle checkpoint. In this paper, we demonstrate that Bub3 has an unexpected role promoting metaphase progression in budding yeast. Loss of Bub3 resulted in a metaphase delay that was not a consequence of aneuploidy or the activation of a checkpoint. Instead, bub3Δ cells had impaired binding of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) with its activator Cdc20, and the delay could be rescued by Cdc20 overexpression. Kinetochore localization of Bub3 was required for normal mitotic progression, and Bub3 and Cdc20 colocalized at the kinetochore. Although Bub1 binds Bub3 at the kinetochore, bub1Δ cells did not have compromised APC/C and Cdc20 binding. The results demonstrate that Bub3 has a previously unknown function at the kinetochore in activating APC/C-Cdc20 for normal mitotic progression.

scholarly journals Microtubule binding by KNL-1 contributes to spindle checkpoint silencing at the kinetochore

2012 ◽  
Vol 196 (4) ◽  
pp. 469-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julien Espeut ◽  
Dhanya K. Cheerambathur ◽  
Lenno Krenning ◽  
Karen Oegema ◽  
Arshad Desai
Keyword(s):  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Protein Phosphatase 1 ◽  
Checkpoint Activation ◽  
Load Bearing ◽  
Microtubule Binding ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Microtubule Attachment ◽  
N Terminus ◽  
Ndc80 Complex ◽  
Checkpoint Signal

Accurate chromosome segregation requires coordination between microtubule attachment and spindle checkpoint signaling at the kinetochore. The kinetochore-localized KMN (KNL-1/Mis12 complex/Ndc80 complex) network, which mediates microtubule attachment and scaffolds checkpoint signaling, harbors two distinct microtubule-binding activities: the load-bearing activity of the Ndc80 complex and a less well-understood activity in KNL-1. In this paper, we show that KNL-1 microtubule-binding and -bundling activity resides in its extreme N terminus. Selective perturbation of KNL-1 microtubule binding in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos revealed that this activity is dispensable for both load-bearing attachment formation and checkpoint activation but plays a role in checkpoint silencing at the kinetochore. Perturbation of both microtubule binding and protein phosphatase 1 docking at the KNL-1 N terminus additively affected checkpoint silencing, indicating that, despite their proximity in KNL-1, these two activities make independent contributions. We propose that microtubule binding by KNL-1 functions in checkpoint silencing by sensing microtubules attached to kinetochores and relaying their presence to eliminate generation of the checkpoint signal.

scholarly journals NEK2A Interacts with MAD1 and Possibly Functions as a Novel Integrator of the Spindle Checkpoint Signaling

2004 ◽  
Vol 279 (19) ◽  
pp. 20049-20057 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Lou ◽  
Jianhui Yao ◽  
Arzhang Zereshki ◽  
Zhen Dou ◽  
Kashif Ahmed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Kinase ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Leucine Zipper ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
Chromosome Bridge

Chromosome segregation in mitosis is orchestrated by protein kinase signaling cascades. A biochemical cascade named spindle checkpoint ensures the spatial and temporal order of chromosome segregation during mitosis. Here we report that spindle checkpoint protein MAD1 interacts with NEK2A, a human orthologue of theAspergillus nidulansNIMA kinase. MAD1 interacts with NEK2Ain vitroandin vivovia a leucine zipper-containing domain located at the C terminus of MAD1. Like MAD1, NEK2A is localized to HeLa cell kinetochore of mitotic cells. Elimination of NEK2A by small interfering RNA does not arrest cells in mitosis but causes aberrant premature chromosome segregation. NEK2A is required for MAD2 but not MAD1, BUB1, and HEC1 to associate with kinetochores. These NEK2A-eliminated or -suppressed cells display a chromosome bridge phenotype with sister chromatid inter-connected. Moreover, loss of NEK2A impairs mitotic checkpoint signaling in response to spindle damage by nocodazole, which affected mitotic escape and led to generation of cells with multiple nuclei. Our data demonstrate that NEK2A is a kinetochore-associated protein kinase essential for faithful chromosome segregation. We hypothesize that NEK2A links MAD2 molecular dynamics to spindle checkpoint signaling.

scholarly journals Explaining the oligomerization properties of the spindle assembly checkpoint protein Mad2

2005 ◽  
Vol 360 (1455) ◽  
pp. 637-648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna DeAntoni ◽  
Valeria Sala ◽  
Andrea Musacchio
Keyword(s):  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Activation ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Open Conformation ◽  
Chromosome Attachment ◽  
A Subunit ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint Complex ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Protein

Mad2 is an essential component of the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), a molecular device designed to coordinate anaphase onset with the completion of chromosome attachment to the spindle. Capture of chromosome by microtubules occur on protein scaffolds known as kinetochores. The SAC proteins are recruited to kinetochores in prometaphase where they generate a signal that halts anaphase until all sister chromatid pairs are bipolarly oriented. Mad2 is a subunit of the mitotic checkpoint complex, which is regarded as the effector of the spindle checkpoint. Its function is the sequestration of Cdc20, a protein required for progression into anaphase. The function of Mad2 in the checkpoint correlates with a dramatic conformational rearrangement of the Mad2 protein. Mad2 adopts a closed conformation (C-Mad2) when bound to Cdc20, and an open conformation (O-Mad2) when unbound to this ligand. Checkpoint activation promotes the conversion of O-Mad2 to Cdc20-bound C-Mad2. We show that this conversion requires a C-Mad2 template and we identify this in Mad1-bound Mad2. In our proposition, Mad1-bound C-Mad2 recruits O-Mad2 to kinetochores, stimulating Cdc20 capture, implying that O-Mad2 and C-Mad2 form dimers. We discuss Mad2 oligomerization and link our discoveries to previous observations related to Mad2 oligomerization.

scholarly journals Bub3p Facilitates Spindle Checkpoint Silencing in Fission Yeast

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (24) ◽  
pp. 5096-5105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent Vanoosthuyse ◽  
John C. Meadows ◽  
Sjaak J.A. van der Sar ◽  
Jonathan B.A. Millar ◽  
Kevin G. Hardwick
Keyword(s):  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Kinase Activity ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Aurora Kinase ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Checkpoint Recovery

Although critical for spindle checkpoint signaling, the role kinetochores play in anaphase promoting complex (APC) inhibition remains unclear. Here we show that spindle checkpoint proteins are severely depleted from unattached kinetochores in fission yeast cells lacking Bub3p. Surprisingly, a robust mitotic arrest is maintained in the majority of bub3Δ cells, yet they die, suggesting that Bub3p is essential for successful checkpoint recovery. During recovery, two defects are observed: (1) cells mis-segregate chromosomes and (2) anaphase onset is significantly delayed. We show that Bub3p is required to activate the APC upon inhibition of Aurora kinase activity in checkpoint-arrested cells, suggesting that Bub3p is required for efficient checkpoint silencing downstream of Aurora kinase. Together, these results suggest that spindle checkpoint signals can be amplified in the nucleoplasm, yet kinetochore localization of spindle checkpoint components is required for proper recovery from a spindle checkpoint-dependent arrest.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document