scholarly journals From the University Presses-The Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for Academic and Research Libraries

2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Brown
Keyword(s):  
Best Practices ◽  
Fair Use ◽  
Research Libraries ◽  
University Presses ◽  
The University

scholarly journals Streaming Media in an Uncertain Legal Environment: A Model Policy and Best Practices for Academic Libraries

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tina M Adams ◽  
Claudia C Holland
Keyword(s):  
Best Practices ◽  
Streaming Media ◽  
Public University ◽  
Fair Use ◽  
Academic Librarians ◽  
Online Course ◽  
Legal Environment ◽  
Video Content ◽  
Research Libraries ◽  
Streaming Videos

As VCRs and DVD players become obsolete, online course offerings increase, and flipped pedagogy becomes ubiquitous, academic librarians are frequently confronted with requests from instructors for streaming media. The authors of this article describe the reasoning for and process by which a policy and best practices to manage streaming media requests were developed at a large public university. This policy is guided by the principles set forth in U.S. Copyright Act’s fair use doctrine (17 U.S.C. § 107) and ARL’s Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for Academic and Research Libraries (2012). The policy also includes a workflow for delivering streaming, ADA-compliant video content that cannot be licensed via conventional library means. Moreover, the comparative costs of purchasing subscription video collections versus licensing individual streaming videos at George Mason University are provided for the fiscal years 2013 through 2016.

scholarly journals How to Fight Fair Use Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt: The Experience of One Open Educational Resource

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsey Weeramuni
Keyword(s):  
Best Practices ◽  
Fair Use ◽  
Open Educational Resources ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Open Educational Resource ◽  
Educational Resource ◽  
Open Education ◽  
Course Content ◽  
The Face ◽  
The University

At the launch of one of the early online open educational resources (OER) in 2002, the approach to addressing copyright was uncertain. Did the university or the faculty own their material? How would the third-party material be handled? Was all of its use considered fair use under Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act (Title 17, United States Code) because of its educational purpose? Or was permission-seeking necessary for this project to succeed and protect the integrity of faculty and university? For many years, this OER was conservative in its approach to third-party material, avoiding making fair use claims on the theory that it was too risky and difficult to prove in the face of an infringement claim. Additionally, being one of the early projects of its kind, there was fear of becoming a target for ambitious copyright holders wanting to make headlines (and perhaps win lawsuits). It was not until 2009 that the Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for OpenCourseWare was written by a community of practitioners who believed that if fair use worked for documentary film makers, video creators, and others (including big media), it worked in open education as well. Once this Code was adopted, universities and institutions were able to offer more rich and complete course content to their users than before. This paper explains how it happened at this early open educational resource offering.

scholarly journals Challenges for Change Agents. Best Practices at the University Library of Freie Universität Berlin

ABI-Technik ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 357-364
Author(s):  
Martin Lee ◽  
Christina Riesenweber
Keyword(s):  
Best Practices ◽  
Change Agents ◽  
Large Change ◽  
University Library ◽  
The Future ◽  
The University ◽  
Insight Into

AbstractThe authors of this article have been managing a large change project at the university library of Freie Universität Berlin since January 2019. At the time of writing this in the summer of 2020, the project is about halfway completed. With this text, we would like to give some insight into our work and the challenges we faced, thereby starting conversations with similar undertakings in the future.

scholarly journals University Community Engagement and the Strategic Planning Process

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Newton Miller
Keyword(s):  
Strategic Planning ◽  
Qualitative Methods ◽  
Quantitative Methods ◽  
Planning Process ◽  
Strategic Plan ◽  
User Experience Design ◽  
Strategic Planning Process ◽  
Research Libraries ◽  
The University ◽  
University Community

Objectives- To understand how university libraries are engaging with the university community (students, faculty, campus partners, administration) when working through the strategic planning process. Methods- Literature review and exploratory open-ended survey to members of CAUL (Council of Australian University Librarians), CARL (Canadian Association of Research Libraries), CONZUL (Council of New Zealand University Librarians), and RLUK (Research Libraries UK) who are most directly involved in the strategic planning process at their library. Results- Out of a potential 113 participants from 4 countries, 31 people replied to the survey in total (27%). Libraries most often mentioned the use of regularly-scheduled surveys to inform their strategic planning which helps to truncate the process for some respondents, as opposed to conducting user feedback specifically for the strategic plan process. Other quantitative methods include customer intelligence and library-produced data. Qualitative methods include the use of focus groups, interviews, and user experience/design techniques to help inform the strategic plan. The focus of questions to users tended to fall towards user-focused (with or without library lens), library-focused, trends & vision, and feedback on plan. Conclusions- Combining both quantitative and qualitative methods can help give a fuller picture for librarians working on a strategic plan. Having the university community join the conversation in how the library moves forward is an important but difficult endeavour. Regardless, the university library needs to be adaptive to the rapidly changing environment around it. Having a sense of how other libraries engage with the university community benefits others who are tasked with strategic planning

scholarly journals Massive Open Online Courses: Legal and Policy Issues for Research Libraries

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon Collins Butler
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Online Courses ◽  
Information Policy ◽  
Fair Use ◽  
Massive Open Online Courses ◽  
Equal Access ◽  
Massive Open Online ◽  
Educational Mission ◽  
Policy Issues ◽  
Research Libraries

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) raise significant legal and policy questions for research libraries, which are often asked to support the development of MOOC courses. These questions involve information policy concerns that are central to research libraries, including the proper application of fair use, the transition to open access as the default mode of scholarly publishing, and the provision of equal access to learning materials for students with and without disabilities. Where possible, research libraries should engage in conversations around MOOCs and promote their core values. By doing so, they will also promote the continuing vitality of libraries as partners in the educational mission.

scholarly journals Library Impact Practice Brief: Supporting Bibliometric Data Needs at Academic Institutions

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon Gordon ◽  
Alison Hitchens
Keyword(s):  
Service Providers ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Data Sources ◽  
Campus Community ◽  
Bibliometric Data ◽  
Institutional Level ◽  
Research Libraries ◽  
Library Impact ◽  
The University ◽  
Impact Framework

This practice brief presents research conducted by staff at the University of Waterloo Library as part of the library’s participation in ARL’s Research Library Impact Framework initiative. The research addressed the question, “How can research libraries support their campus community in accessing needed bibliometric data for institutional-level purposes?” The brief explores: service background, partners, service providers and users, how bibliometric data are used, data sources, key lessons learned, and recommended resources.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document