Total Perineal Prostatectomy: A Retrospective Study in Six Dogs

Perineal hernia refers to the herniation of pelvic and abdominal viscera into the subcutaneous perineal region through a pelvic diaphragm weakness: a concomitant prostatic disease is observed in 25–59% of cases. Prostatectomy involves the removal of the prostate, either partially (partial prostatectomy) or completely (total prostatectomy). In case of complicated perineal hernia, staged procedures are recommended: celiotomy in order to perform colopexy, vasopexy, cystopexy, and/or to treat the prostatic disease, and perineal access in order to repair the perineal hernia. Very few reports relate prostatectomy using a perineal approach and, to the extent of the author’s knowledge, this technique has not been thoroughly investigated in the literature. The aim of this article is to retrospectively describe the total perineal prostatectomy in dogs presenting perineal hernia with concomitant prostatic diseases which required the removal of the gland. The experience in six dogs (three dogs with the prostate within hernial contents and three dogs with intrapelvic prostate) is reported as well as advantages, disadvantages, and limitations of the surgical procedure. In the authors’ clinical practice, total perineal prostatectomy has been a useful surgical approach to canine prostatic diseases, proven to be safe, well tolerated, and effective.

Table Sugar as a Bridge from Emergency to Elective Perineal Proctosigmoidectomy for Incarcerated Rectal Prolapse

Incarcerated rectal prolapse is a rare pathology and is considered an emergency, using table sugar can shift the emergency surgery to an elective one. If left untreated, rectal prolapse may present as an emergency, be it incarceration or strangulation. In an emergency presentation for incarcerated rectal prolapse every attempt should be taken to reduce the prolapsed rectum, if not successful, emergency surgery is indicated, with perineal approach being the first choice in elderly with multiple comorbidities.

Abdominotransanal resection of a strangulated rectal carcinosarcoma

This is a case of a 75-year-old man who presented with a 7-month history of a reducible rectal mass. The patient came to the emergency department with a prolapsed necrotic bowel involving a strangulated segment with the rectal mass. He underwent an abdominotransanal resection through a combined abdominal and perineal approach. His postoperative course was unremarkable. Histopathological and immunohistochemical studies showed a rectal carcinosarcoma. Because of a state-mandated lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the patient failed to follow-up. He was later seen to have metastatic progression. Owing to the poor functional status of the patient, the shared decision of the multidisciplinary team, the patient and his family was to manage him with palliative intent.

Giant abdominopelvic desmoid tumour herniated trough perineum: a case report

Desmoid tumours are deep aggressive fibromatoses that usually arise in the soft tissues of the limbs or the abdominal wall. Intra-abdominal localisation, rarely occurs and their treatment may be challenging. When necessary, surgery must be personalized to what is achievable in terms of margins while preserving functional outcomes. This condition is illustrated herein with the case of a 40-year-old female presenting an unusually large sporadic desmoid tumour with abdominal, pelvic and perineal involvement. Resection was performed without organ involvement through a combined perineal approach. Tumour resection was macroscopically completed except in the perineum, where the tumour was left (R2 resection) to preserve anal sphincter. Adjuvant treatment with tamoxifen was given to achieve local control. The hormonal treatment was well tolerated, and no recurrence was observed after 36 months of follow-up.

Radikal Perineal Prostatektomi Sonrası Erektil Fonksiyonun Değerlendirilmesi

PURPOSE: Radical prostatectomy (RP) is the gold standard treatment option for localized prostate cancer (Pca) treatment. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the potance condition of patients who completed the first year after the radical prostatectomy operation with the perineal approach . PATİENTS AND METHODS: The study included 107 preoperatively potant patients who underwent RPP for localized PCA between April 2006 and September 2009. Besides to 65 patients with a preoperative International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)- 5 score of 21 or over, 42 patients who were evaluated with their partners, even though whose preopeative IIEF-5 score was between 16-20; however, answered yes to the SEP 2 and SEP 3 questions, were considered as potant. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 62.4 years. The mean preoperative PSA value was 6.5 ng/dL. The mean prostate volume was 48cc (15-70). Eighty-one (75.7%) of all patients were able to continue their sexual life with or without medication at postoperative 12th month. Forty-four (54.3%) patients were normal in terms of sexual function without any need for additional treatment CONCLUSİON: We evaluated that erectile function was preserved in 81 of 107 (75.7%) patients after 1 year from surgery with or without medical therapy.

Rectoperineal Fistula Presented 5 Months After Repair of Severe Obstetric Perineal Laceration: A Case Report

Introduction: Obstetric severe perineal laceration can frequently occur as a surgical site infection (SSI), which sometimes leads to rectovaginal fistula after repair. We encountered a rare case of a rectoperineal fistula 5 months after repair of a severe perineal laceration.Case presentation: The patient was a 39-year-old woman who underwent repair of a fourth-degree perineal laceration after vaginal delivery. Five months after primary repair, she presented with perineal swelling and pain followed by uncontrollable flatulence or passage of feces at the perineum, which was finally diagnosed as a rectoperineal fistula. Transperineal repair with fistulous tract excision was performed for the rectoperineal fistula. Closure of the rectum, perineal body, and vagina was performed layer-by-layer constructing a thick perineum to prevent anal dysfunction. The fistula was successfully closed, and the patient did not show any symptoms of fecal incontinence 6 months after surgery.Discussion: As the rectoperineal fistula might have resulted in SSI at the primary repair of the obstetric injury, the delayed occurrence of the rectoperineal fistula was unusual. A perineal approach should be performed for complete fistulous tract excision, reconstruction of a robust perineal structure, and preservation of anal sphincter function.