Predictors of Depression in Healthcare Patients at Risk of Self-Neglect

More than half of reports to Adult Protective Services agencies nationwide involve allegations of self-neglect. An intensive case management intervention for preventing self-neglect was evaluated in a longitudinal study conducted collaboratively by a large healthcare system, Adult Protective Services, and a gerontological research institute. Patients (444) who were older (60+ years) and/or disabled (18+ years) were randomly selected for participation from 19 primary-care clinics if they had risk factors for self-neglect, including depression, substance abuse, dementia, and/or impairment in activities of daily living. Average age was 68 years (SD=12.5), 68% were Hispanic, 68% had monthly income of less than $1,361, and 67% were female. Clinics were randomized into intervention and control groups. Intervention clinic patients received intensive case management services; control clinic patients received usual care, including social work services. Subjects were interviewed at baseline and four months later. The Stress Process Model guided a multiple regression analysis. Domains of background characteristics, primary and secondary stressors, and support (patients in intervention or control group) were entered in blocks to predict depression levels at post-test. While no significant differences were found in post-test depression levels between intervention and controls, the final model was statistically significant (adjusted R2=.452). Significant predictors of depression were: younger age (disabled adults), poorer self-rated physical and emotional health, greater loneliness, and less social support. Future analyses will examine effects of moderating variables on post-test depression levels. Practice implications of preliminary analyses include addressing disabled adults’ mental health needs, especially if they are isolated and lack social support.

Evaluating the Impact of Intensive Case Management for Severe Vocational Injuries on Work Incapacity and Costs

Purpose This study investigates the impact of an intensive case management program on sick leave days, permanent work incapacity levels and treatment costs for severe vocational injuries set up by the French National Insurance Fund in five health insurance districts. Methods The method employed relies on a four-step matching procedure combining Coarsened Exact Matching and Propensity Score Matching, based on an original administrative dataset. Average Treatment effects on the Treated were estimated using a parametric model with a large set of covariates. Results After one-year follow-up, workers in the treatment group had higher sickness absence rates, with 22 extra days, and the program led to 2.7 (95% CI 2.3–3.1) times more diagnoses of permanent work incapacity in the treatment group. With an estimated yearly operational cost of 2,722 € per treated worker, the average total extra treatment cost was 4,569 € for treated workers, which corresponds to a cost increase of 29.2% for the insurance fund. Conclusions The higher costs found for the treatment group are mainly due to longer sick leave duration for the moderate severity group, implying higher cash transfers in the form of one-off indemnities. Even though workers in the treated group have more diagnoses of permanent work incapacity, the difference of severity between groups is small. Our results on longer sick leave duration are partly to be explained by interactions between the case managers and the occupational physicians that encouraged patients to stay longer off-work for better recovery, despite the higher costs that this represented for the insurance fund and the well-documented adverse side effects of longer periods off-work.

Housing Matters, Services Might: Findings from the High Needs Families Program Evaluation

Permanent supportive housing for families experiencing homelessness—typically, subsidized housing that is not time limited and provides access to a range of support services—has substantially increased over the past 10 years, despite an absence of rigorous evidence of its effectiveness. We examine the benefits of subsidized housing with supportive services compared to subsidized housing alone. Our findings suggest that supportive housing offers more opportunities for access to services and benefits than subsidized housing alone, but it may not be beneficial to families’ housing stability or to family members’ employment or involvement with the criminal justice system. We argue that housing that is coupled with intensive case management, that is service rich, and that provides and adheres to harm reduction principles may help to strengthen supportive housing’s effectiveness.

Lessons Learned on Recruiting and Retaining Young Fathers in a Parenting and Repeat Pregnancy Prevention Program

Introduction Research shows that mainstream parenting and repeat pregnancy prevention programs generally do not effectively engage with fathers and that young men’s levels of participation in such services are low. To support practitioners in overcoming the barriers to recruiting and retaining young fathers, the current study aimed to gather lessons learned from one program’s state administrators, case managers, and young fathers about the most effective strategies for engaging this population in intensive case management. Methods Three focus groups were conducted. One focus group was held with the creators and managers of the Michigan Adolescent Pregnancy and Parenting Program MI-APPP at the state Department of Health and Human Services (n = 3). The other two groups were designed to jointly engage young fathers currently involved in intensive case management (n = 11) and their case managers (n = 5). A qualitative analysis of the focus group transcripts was conducted using a coding scheme developed from emerging themes in the transcripts and related literature. Results The findings highlight a selection of those strategies that focus group participants perceived to be most successful in improving male recruitment and retention in intensive ongoing case management. Among these strategies were centralizing feedback from young fathers in program decision making, offering opportunities for young fathers to connect, and challenging staff’s negative stereotypes about young fathers. Discussion Despite the small sample size, the results of this study nevertheless contribute to debates in the field regarding appropriate strategies for engaging young fathers by informing professional practice.