posterior stabilized
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

557
(FIVE YEARS 158)

H-INDEX

43
(FIVE YEARS 5)

2021 ◽  
pp. 103734
Author(s):  
Thomas Anijs ◽  
David Wolfson ◽  
Alasdair Mercer ◽  
Mick Rock ◽  
Nico Verdonschot ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (11) ◽  
pp. 921-925
Author(s):  
Afton K. Limberg ◽  
Cody C. Wyles ◽  
Michael J. Taunton ◽  
Arlen D. Hanssen ◽  
Mark W. Pagnano ◽  
...  

Aims Varus-valgus constrained (VVC) devices are typically used in revision settings, often with stems to mitigate the risk of aseptic loosening. However, in at least one system, the VVC insert is compatible with the primary posterior-stabilized (PS) femoral component, which may be an option in complex primary situations. We sought to determine the implant survivorship, radiological and clinical outcomes, and complications when this VVC insert was coupled with a PS femur without stems in complex primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). Methods Through our institution’s total joint registry, we identified 113 primary TKAs (103 patients) performed between 2007 and 2017 in which a VVC insert was coupled with a standard cemented PS femur without stems. Mean age was 68 years (SD 10), mean BMI was 32 kg/m2 (SD 7), and 59 patients (50%) were male. Mean follow-up was four years (2 to 10). Results The five-year survivorship free from aseptic loosening was 100%. The five-year survivorship free from any revision was 99%, with the only revision performed for infection. The five-year survivorship free from reoperation was 93%. The most common reoperation was treatment for infection (n = 4; 4%), followed by manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA; n = 2; 2%). Survivorship free from any complication at five years was 90%, with superficial wound infection as the most frequent (n = 4; 4%). At most recent follow-up, two TKAs had non-progressive radiolucent lines about both the tibial and femoral components. Knee Society Scores improved from 53 preoperatively to 88 at latest follow-up (p < 0.001). Conclusion For complex primary TKA in occasional situations, coupling a VVC insert with a standard PS femur without stems proved reliable and durable at five years. Longer-term follow-up is required before recommending this technique more broadly. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(11):921–925.


Author(s):  
Artit Laoruengthana ◽  
Piti Rattanaprichavej ◽  
Purinon Suangyanon ◽  
Monton Galassi ◽  
Passakorn Teekaweerakit ◽  
...  

The Knee ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 121-130
Author(s):  
Takenori Tomite ◽  
Hidetomo Saito ◽  
Hiroaki Kijima ◽  
Noriyuki Ishikawa ◽  
Yuji Hatakeyama ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ji-Hoon Baek ◽  
Su Chan Lee ◽  
Jin-Hong Kim ◽  
Hye Sun Ahn ◽  
Chang Hyun Nam

AbstractThe purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the placement of pin trackers in the medial sagittal plane of the distal femur in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) over a minimum follow-up period of 3 months. From August 2020 to October 2020, a consecutive series of 81 TKAs were performed in 59 patients using the Triathlon posterior-stabilized total knee prosthesis with a robotic-assisted system (Mako) at our hospital. Patient charts were reviewed for complications associated with the pin sites, including fracture, infection, thigh pain, and the need for reoperation. No patients had any minor or major complications associated with distal femoral pins. This technique, which used pin trackers in the medial sagittal plane of the distal femur, could be a useful option for surgeons performing robotic-assisted TKA. This is a Level IV study.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document