A biomechanical analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion alone or combined cervical fixations in treating compression-extension injury with unilateral facet joint fracture: a finite element study

Background Compression-extension injury with unilateral facet joint fracture is one of the most devastating injuries of subaxial cervical spine. However, it is not yet clear which fixation technique represents the optimal choice in surgical management. This study aims to assess the construct stability at the operative level (C4/C5 cervical spine) following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) alone and combined fixation techniques (posterior-anterior fixations). Methods A previously validated three-dimensional C2-T1 finite element model were modified to simulate surgical procedures via the anterior-only approach (ACDF) and combined cervical approach [(transarticular screw, lateral mass screw, unilateral pedicle screw, bilateral pedicle screw) + ACDF, respectively] for treating compression-extension injury with unilateral facet joint fracture at C4/C5 level. Construct stability (range of rotation, axial compression displacement and anterior shear displacement) at the operative level was comparatively analyzed. Results In comparison with combined fixation techniques, a wider range of motion and a higher maximum von Mises stress was found in single ACDF. There was no obvious difference in range of motion among transarticular screw and other posterior fixations in the presence of anterior fixation. In addition, the screws inserted by transarticular screw technique had high stress concentration at the middle part of the screw but much less than 500 MPa under different conditions. Furthermore, the variability of von Mises stress in the transarticular screw fixation device was significantly lower than ACDF but no obvious difference compared with other posterior fixations. Conclusions Of the five fixation techniques, ACDF has proven poor stability and high structural stress. Compared with lateral and pedicle screw, transarticular screw technique was not worse biomechanically and less technically demanding to acquire in clinical practice. Therefore, our study suggested that combined fixation technique (transarticular screw + ACDF) would be a reasonable treatment option to acquire an immediate stabilization in the management of compression-extension injury with unilateral facet joint fracture. However, clinical aspects must also be regarded when choosing a reconstruction method for a specific patient.

Reducible Nonunited Type II Odontoid Fracture with Atlantoaxial Instability: Outcomes of Two Different Fixation Techniques

Displaced nonunited type II odontoid fracture can result in atlantoaxial instability, causing delayed cervical myelopathy. Both Magerl’s C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation technique and Harms-Goel C1-C2 screw-rod segmental fixation technique are effective techniques to provide stability. This study aimed to demonstrate the results of two surgical fixation techniques for the treatment of reducible nonunited type II odontoid fracture with atlantoaxial instability. Medical records of patients with reducible nonunited type II odontoid fracture hospitalized for spinal fusion between April 2007 and April 2018 were reviewed. For each patient, specific surgical fixation, either Magerl’s C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation technique augmented with supplemental wiring or Harms-Goel C1-C2 screw-rod fixation technique, was performed according to our management protocol. We reported the fusion rate, fusion period, and complications for each technique. Of 21 patients, 10 patients were treated with Magerl’s C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation technique augmented with supplemental wiring, and 11 were treated with Harms-Goel C1-C2 screw-rod fixation technique. The bony fusion rate was 100% in both groups. The median time to fusion was 69.7 (95%CI 53.1, 86.3) days in Magerl’s C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation technique and 75.2 (95%CI 51.8, 98.6) days in Harms-Goel C1-C2 screw-rod fixation technique. No severe complications were observed in either group. Displaced reducible, nonunited type II odontoid fracture with cervical myelopathy should be treated by surgery. Both fixation techniques promote bony fusion and provide substantial construct stability.

Transarticular Fixation Following Mobilization of “High-Riding” Vertebral Artery

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE: The article identifies the feasibility of transarticular screw fixation after mobilizing the vertebral artery in cases where it is in a “high-riding” location. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: A 42-yr-old male patient had a 4-yr history of progressive quadriparesis. Investigations revealed severe basilar invagination. There was assimilation of atlas and C2-3 fusion. The vertebral artery was “high-riding” into the pedicle-facet of C2 vertebra on both sides. Vertebral artery loop was exposed and mobilized inferiorly on both sides after careful drilling of pedicular bone on the posterior aspect of the dome of the artery. C2 facetal bone on the anterior face of the vertebral artery dome was now available for screw insertion. The C1-2 facets and the articulation were directly in line, making transarticular screw fixation relatively straightforward. The wide bone space available permitted insertion of 2 screws in a transarticular fashion on both sides. The patient had satisfactory clinical improvement. Imaging after 22 mo showed bone fusion across the facets. CONCLUSION: Mobilization of the high-riding vertebral artery loop can help salvage the surgical procedure of lateral mass stabilization.

Managing the Anomalous Vertebral Artery in C1–C2 Stabilization for Congenital Atlantoaxial Instability

Objectives This study aimed to demonstrate the technique of handling the anomalous vertebral artery in congenital atlantoaxial instability. The vertebral artery course can be variable in congenital atlantoaxial instability, especially if there is assimilation of atlas. The surgical technique to stabilize the atlantoaxial joint should ensure the patency and safety of the vertebral artery and prevents devastating stroke. Computed tomography (CT) angiography of the vertebral artery is mandatory in planning the surgical strategies. The vertebral artery can be injured during dissection of soft tissues between atlas and axis and can be compromised during distraction and instrumentation. The vertebral artery needs to be mobilized based on the tortuosity in the course during instrumentation and prevents compression of the artery against bony structures or screw heads. The vertebral artery has to be identified earlier in the course of dissection and should protect it. It is also imperative to choose the surgical approach that can be performed under vision using operative microscope rather than adapting blind procedures like transarticular screw. Here, in our present case, we demonstrate the technique of mobilizing the vertebral artery which was coursing medially preventing the access for the instrumentation and perform stabilization of atlantoaxial joint using Goel–Harms technique, and prevent its compression after placement of screw by deroofing the bony ridges of axis (Figs. 1 and 2). We also emphasize the various technical nuances during the stabilization with distraction of joint space of atlas and axis.The link to the video can be found at: https://youtu.be/pgURpF_jACc.

Technical outcome of atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation without supplementary posterior construct for rheumatoid arthritis

Background: transarticular screw (TAS) fixation without a supplementary posterior construct, even in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, provides sufficient stability with acceptable clinical results. Here, we present our experience with 15 RA patients who underwent atlantoaxial (AA) TAS fixation without utilizing a supplementary posterior fusion. Methods: To treat AA instability, all 15 RA patients underwent C1–C2 TAS fixation without a supplementary posterior construct. Patients were followed for at least 24 months. Pre- and postoperative sagittal measures of C1– C2, C2–C7, and C1–C7 angles, atlanto-dens interval (ADI), posterior atlanto-dens interval (PADI), and adjacent segment (i.e., C2–C3) anterior disc height (ADH) were retrospectively recorded from lateral X-ray imaging. The presence or absence of superior migration of the odontoid (SMO), cervical subaxial subluxation, C1–C2 bony fusion, screw pull-out, and screw breakage were also noted. Results: There was little difference between the pre- and postoperative studies regarding angles measured. Following TAS fixation, the mean ADI shortened, and mean PADI lengthened. There was no difference in the mean measures of C2–C3 ADH. There was no evidence of SMO pre- or postoperatively. Two patients developed anterior subluxation at C5–C6; one of the two also developed anterior subluxation at C2–C3. All patients subsequently showed C1–C2 bony fusion without screw pull-out or breakage. Conclusion: In RA patients who have undergone C1–C2 TAS fixation, eliminating a supplementary posterior fusion resulted in adequate stability.