implantable collamer lens
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

328
(FIVE YEARS 142)

H-INDEX

22
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2022 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Shen ◽  
Xun Chen ◽  
Yiyong Xian ◽  
Xuanqi Wang ◽  
Xiaoying Wang ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nian Guan ◽  
Xiao-Nong Zhang ◽  
Wan-Jun Zhang

Abstract Background Implantable Collamer lens (ICL) vaulting is one of the most important parameters for the safety, aqueous humor circulation, and lens transparency after ICL implantation. This study aimed to investigate the factors associated with the actual vaulting after refractive EVO-ICL surgery. Methods This retrospective study included patients who underwent EVO-ICL surgery at a tertiary eye hospital between October and December 2019. A RESCAN 700 was used for the intraoperative and CIRRUS HD-OCT was used for postoperative observation of vaulting. Subjective and objective refractions, anterior ocular segment, corneal morphology, intraocular pressure (IOP), anterior chamber volume (ACV), crystalline lens rise (CLR), white-to-white distance (WTW), anterior chamber depth (ACD), axial length, corneal endothelial cell density (ECD), and fundoscopy were examined. A multivariable analysis was performed to determine the factors independently associated with 1-month postoperative vaulting. Results Fifty-one patients (102 eyes) were included. Compared with the eyes with normal vaulting, those with high vaulting had higher preoperative diopter values (P = 0.039), lower preoperative corrected visual acuity (P = 0.006), lower preoperative IOP (P = 0.029), higher preoperative ACD (P = 0.004), lower preoperative CLR (P = 0.046), higher ICL spherical equivalent (P = 0.030), higher intraoperative vaulting (P < 0.001), and lower IOP at 1 month (P = 0.045). The multivariable analysis showed that the only factor independently associated with high vaulting at 1 month after surgery was the intraoperative vaulting value (odds ratio = 1.005, 95% confidence interval: 1.002–1.007, P < 0.001). The intraoperative and 1-month postoperative vaulting values were positively correlated (R2 = 0.562). Conclusions The RESCAN700 system can be used to perform intraoperative optical coherence tomography to predict the vaulting value of ICL at 1 month.


2022 ◽  
Vol 100 (S267) ◽  
Author(s):  
Safa Ben Aoun ◽  
Meriem Ouederni ◽  
Fehmy Nefaa ◽  
Wijdene Nabi ◽  
Monia Cheour

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Xiaoyong Chen ◽  
Di Zhang ◽  
Ziyuan Liu ◽  
Yinan Liu ◽  
Hongyuan Cai ◽  
...  

Purpose. To investigate the possible effect of an implantable collamer lens (ICL) on ocular biometrics and intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation. Methods. Ocular measurements were taken preoperatively and at the two-month follow-up using IOLMaster 700 and Sirius in 85 eyes (43 patients) who had previously undergone ICL surgery. IOL power was calculated using either IOLMaster 700 (Barrett Universal II formula) or Sirius (ray-tracing). All data were compared using the paired t-test. Results. The difference between preoperative and postoperative anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and keratometry on the steep axis (K2) measured by IOLMaster 700 was statistically significant (p < 0.001). In 11 of 85 eyes, IOLMaster misjudged the anterior surface of the ICL as that of the lens, leading to an error in ACD and LT. There were no significant differences between preoperative and postoperative axial length (AL) (p = 0.223), white to white (WTW) (p = 0.100), keratometry on flat axis (K1) (p = 0.117), or central corneal thickness (CCT) (p = 0.648), measured using IOLMaster. The difference in IOL power calculated using the Barrett II formula was significant (p = 0.013). Regression analysis showed that AL and K had the greatest influence on IOL calculation (p < 0.001), and ACD and LT had less influence (p = 0.002, p = 0.218, respectively). K1 and K2 were modified to exclude the influence of K2, and modified IOLs showed no difference between pre and postoperation (p = 0.372). Preoperative and postoperative ACD measured using Sirius were significantly different (p < 0.001); however, the IOL power calculated using ray-tracing technology showed no significant differences (p > 0.05). Conclusions. The ocular biometric apparatus may misjudge the anterior surface of the lens, resulting in measurement errors of ACD and LT, which has little effect on the calculation of IOL power when using IOLMaster 700 (Barrett Universal II formula) and Sirius (ray-tracing).


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazutaka Kamiya ◽  
Kimiya Shimizu ◽  
Masahide Takahashi ◽  
Wakako Ando ◽  
Hideki Hayakawa ◽  
...  

Purpose: To assess the 8-year clinical outcomes of implantation of an implantable collamer lens (ICL) with a central port (KS-Aquaport; EVO-ICL) for moderate to high myopia and myopic astigmatism.Methods: This retrospective study comprised a total of 177 eyes of 106 patients with spherical equivalents of −7.99 ± 3.33 D [mean ± standard deviation], who underwent EVO-ICL implantation. We evaluated the safety, efficacy, predictability, stability, and adverse events of the surgery, at 1 month, and 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 years postoperatively.Results: The logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (LogMAR) uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) were −0.07 ± 0.17 and −0.20 ± 0.09, respectively, at 8 years postoperatively. The safety and efficacy indices were 1.18 ± 0.24 and 0.89 ± 0.28, respectively. At 8 years, 83 and 93% eyes were within ± 0.5 D and ± 1.0 D of the targeted correction, respectively. Change in manifest refraction from 1 month to 8 years postoperatively was −0.13 ± 0.30 D. Three eyes (1.7%) that developed cataracts had a slight pre-existing peripheral anterior subcapsular cataract formation required simultaneous ICL extraction and cataract surgery at 2 or 3 years or ICL size change (1 size up) at 7 years postoperatively. We found that neither significant intraocular pressure (IOP) rise (including pupillary block) nor significant endothelial cell loss occurred in any case throughout the 8-year observation period.Conclusions: Current ICL implantation with central port technology offered good continuous outcomes for all measures of safety, efficacy, predictability, and stability for correcting moderate to high myopic errors over a long period, thereby suggesting its long-term viability as a surgical approach for the treatment of such eyes.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Xun Chen ◽  
Xuanqi Wang ◽  
Yilin Xu ◽  
Mingrui Cheng ◽  
Tian Han ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xun Chen ◽  
Zhi Chen ◽  
Huamao Miao ◽  
Xuanqi Wang ◽  
Xiaoying Wang ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose: To investigate the refractive stability, axial length changes and their related factors in a high myopia population after Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) implantation.Methods: This prospective study included 116 eyes of 116 patients divided into several groups based on the spherical equivalent refractive error (SE)—SE > -6D, -12 ≤ SE < -6D and SE < -12D groups—and axial length (AL)—AL < 28mm and AL ≥ 28mm groups. The uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity, refraction, axial length and intraocular pressure were followed for 1 year.Results: SE changed from -11.53 ± 5.25D preoperatively to -0.33 ± 0.70D at 1 week, and further changed to -0.48 ± 0.77D at 1 year after ICL implantation, with average progression being -0.15 ± 0.37D from 1 week to 1 year after surgery. Axial length changed from 27.95 ± 2.33mm preoperatively to 27.98 ± 2.36mm 1 year after surgery, with an average axial elongation of 0.03 ± 0.12mm. The mean axial elongation rate was 0.05mm/year in the SE < -12D group, being significantly faster than the other SE groups (P < 0.05); it was 0.06mm/year in the AL ≥ 28mm group, being significantly faster than the AL < 28mm group (P < 0.05).Conclusion: Patients with high myopia and long axial length showed a continuous myopic progression and axial elongation at an adult age after ICL surgery, especially those with myopia higher than -12.0D and AL longer than 28.00mm.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Cao ◽  
Jingshang Zhang ◽  
Jinda Wang ◽  
Mayinuer Yusufu ◽  
Shanshan Jin ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose To compare the efficacy, safety, predictability and visual quality between implantable collamer lens (ICL) implantation and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for high myopia correction in adults. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. A comprehensive literature search was done based on databases including PubMed, Science Direct, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The efficacy index, safety index, changes in Snellen lines of corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), predictability (difference between post-operative and attempted spherical equivalent error, SER), incidence of halos, and change in higher-order aberrations (HOAs) were compared. Mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to estimate continuous outcomes, risk ratio (RR) and 95%CI was used to estimate categorical outcomes. Results Five observational studies involving 555 eyes were included in this review. Studies’ sample sizes (eyes) ranged from 76 to 197. Subjects’ refraction ranged from -6 diopter (D) to -12D. Study duration of most researches were 6 months or 12 months. Compared to SMILE, ICL implantation showed better efficacy index (MD=0.09, 95%CI:0.01 to 0.16) and better safety index (MD=0.08, 95%CI: 0.00 to 0.16). Compared with SMILE, more ICL-treated eyes gained one or more Snellen lines of CDVA (RR=1.54, 95%CI:1.28 to 1.86), more gained two or more lines (RR=2.09, 95%CI:1.40 to 3.13), less lost one or more lines (RR=0.17, 95%CI:0.05 to 0.63). There was no difference in predictability between two treatments, RRs of predictability of within ±0.5D and ±1D were 1.13 (95%CI: 0.94 to 1.36) and 1.00 (95%CI: 0.98 to 1.02). Compared with SMILE, ICL implantation came with a higher risk of halos [RR=1.79, 95%CI: 1.48 to 2.16] and less increase in total HOAs (MD=-0.23, 95%CI: -0.42 to -0.03). Conclusion Compared with SMILE, ICL implantation showed a higher risk of halos, but equal performance on SER control, and better performance on efficacy index, safety index, CDVA improvement and HOAs control. Overall, ICL implantation might be a better choice for high myopia correction in adults.


2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (12) ◽  
pp. 824-829
Author(s):  
Hani F. Sakla ◽  
Wasim Altroudi ◽  
Yousef F.R. Sakla ◽  
Gonzalo Muñoz ◽  
Catia Pineza

PRILOZI ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 37-46
Author(s):  
Biljana Kostovska ◽  
Jasmina Pluncevikj Gligoroska ◽  
Fanka Gilevska ◽  
Zlatko Arnaudovski ◽  
Nikica Gabric

Abstract Objective: Analysis of visual acuity parameters in patients with moderate to high myopia and myopic astigmatism 1 year after treatment with phakic intraocular lenses. Material and methods: This was a retrospective study on 35 patients (52 eyes) with moderate to high myopia who were implanted with the Visian V4c phakic implantable Collamer lens (Staar Surgical, Nidau, Switzerland). Examined parameters were: uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and best corrected visual acuity (CDVA), manifest and cycloplegic refraction, intraocular pressure, and endothelial cell count. The investigated parameters were measured preoperatively, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Results: In 17 patients, phakic lenses were implanted binocularly and in 18 patients monocularly. Preoperatively 34.62% of patients had CDVA from 0.9 to 1.0. One year after the surgery 48.08% of patients had UDVA from 0.9 to 1.0. Preoperatively 80.77% of patients had diopter range from -6.00 Dsph to -10.00 Dsph. At 1 year postoperatively 78.85% of patients were within 0.00 Dsph to -1.00 Dsph. Preoperatively, in patients with astigmatism -4 Dcyl to -2 Dcyl dominated, as opposed to significant improvement postoperatively when 94.23% had astigmatism ranging from -1.0 Dcyl to 0 Dcyl. Conclusion: The implantation of phakic lenses demonstrated a successful postoperative outcome in the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism. Visual acuity and refraction show a gradual and significant improvement in visual function parameters within 1 year of lens implantation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document