forward induction
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

73
(FIVE YEARS 6)

H-INDEX

16
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Audrey Vingadassalon ◽  
Florence Lorieux ◽  
Maud Juguet ◽  
Alba Noël ◽  
Luisa D. F. Santos ◽  
...  

The production of specialized metabolites by Streptomyces bacteria is usually temporally regulated. This regulation is complex and frequently involves both global and pathway-specific mechanisms. Streptomyces ambofaciens ATCC23877 produces several specialized metabolites, including spiramycins, stambomycins, kinamycins and congocidine. The production of the first three molecules has been shown to be controlled by one or several cluster-situated transcriptional regulators. However, nothing is known regarding the regulation of congocidine biosynthesis. Congocidine (netropsin) belongs to the family of pyrrolamide metabolites, which also includes distamycin and anthelvencins. Most pyrrolamides bind into the minor groove of DNA, specifically in A/T-rich regions, which gives them numerous biological activities, such as antimicrobial and antitumoral activities. We previously reported the characterization of the pyrrolamide biosynthetic gene clusters of congocidine ( cgc ) in S. ambofaciens ATCC23877, distamycin ( dst ) in Streptomyces netropsis DSM40846 and anthelvencins ( ant ) in Streptomyces venezuelae ATCC14583. The three gene clusters contain a gene encoding a putative transcriptional regulator, cgc1 , dst1 and ant1 respectively. Cgc1, Dst1 and Ant1 present a high percentage of amino acid sequence similarity. We demonstrate here that Cgc1, an atypical orphan response regulator, activates the transcription of all cgc genes in the stationary phase of S. ambofaciens growth. We also show that the cgc cluster is constituted of eight main transcriptional units. Finally, we show that congocidine induces the expression of the transcriptional regulator Cgc1 and of the operon containing the resistance genes ( cgc20 and cgc21 , coding for an ABC transporter), and propose a model for the transcriptional regulation of the cgc gene cluster. Importance Understanding the mechanisms of regulation of specialized metabolite production can have important implications both at the level of specialized metabolism study (expression of silent gene clusters) and the biotechnological level (increase of the production of a metabolite of interest). We report here a study on the regulation of the biosynthesis of a metabolite from the pyrrolamide family, congocidine. We show that congocidine biosynthesis and resistance is controlled by Cgc1, a cluster-situated regulator. As the gene clusters directing the biosynthesis of the pyrrolamides distamycin and anthelvencin encode a homolog of Cgc1, our findings may be relevant for the biosynthesis of other pyrrolamides. In addition, our results reveal a new type of feed-forward induction mechanism, in which congocidine induces its own biosynthesis through the induction of the transcription of cgc1 .


2021 ◽  
pp. 2150022
Author(s):  
Swagata Bhattacharjee

This paper explores how delegation can be used as a signal to sustain cooperation. I consider a static principal–agent model with two tasks, one resembling a coordination game. If there is asymmetric information about the agent’s type, the principal with high private belief can delegate the first task as a signal. This is also supported by the forward induction argument. However, in the laboratory setting, this equilibrium is chosen only sometimes. When the subjects have information about past sessions, there is a significant increase in the use of delegation. This finding sheds light on equilibrium selection in Bayesian games.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 1605-1654
Author(s):  
Adam Brandenburger ◽  
Alexander Danieli ◽  
Amanda Friedenberg

The epistemic conditions of rationality and mth‐order strong belief of rationality (R mSBR; Battigalli and Siniscalchi, 2002) formalize the idea that players engage in contextualized forward‐induction reasoning. This paper characterizes the behavior consistent with R mSBR across all type structures. In particular, in a class of generic games, R( m − 1)SBR is characterized by a new solution concept we call an m‐best response sequence ( m‐BRS). Such sequences are an iterative version of extensive‐form best response sets (Battigalli and Friedenberg, 2012). The strategies that survive m rounds of extensive‐form rationalizability are consistent with an m‐BRS, but there are m‐BRS's that are disjoint from the former set. As such, there is behavior that is consistent with R( m − 1)SBR but inconsistent with m rounds of extensive‐form rationalizability. We use our characterization to draw implications for the interpretation of experimental data. Specifically, we show that the implications are nontrivial in the three‐repeated Prisoner's Dilemma and Centipede games.


Author(s):  
Emiliano Catonini

Abstract In dynamic games, players may observe a deviation from a pre-play, possibly incomplete, non-binding agreement before the game is over. The attempt to rationalize the deviation may lead players to revise their beliefs about the deviator’s behaviour in the continuation of the game. This instance of forward induction reasoning is based on interactive beliefs about not just rationality, but also the compliance with the agreement itself. I study the effects of such rationalization on the self-enforceability of the agreement. Accordingly, outcomes of the game are deemed implementable by some agreement or not. Conclusions depart substantially from what the traditional equilibrium refinements suggest. A non-subgame perfect equilibrium outcome may be induced by a self-enforcing agreement, while a subgame perfect equilibrium outcome may not. The incompleteness of the agreement can be crucial to implement an outcome.


2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 149-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Lu ◽  
Wang-sheng Wang ◽  
Yi-kai Lin ◽  
Jiang-wen Lu ◽  
Wen-jiao Li ◽  
...  

Our previous studies have demonstrated that human fetal membranes are capable of de novo synthesis of serum amyloid A1 (SAA1), an acute phase protein of inflammation, wherein SAA1 may participate in parturition by inducing a number of inflammation mediators including interleukine-1β, interleukine-6 and prostaglandin E2. However, the regulation of SAA1 expression in the fetal membranes remains largely unknown. In the current study, we examined the regulation of SAA1 expression by cortisol, a crucial steroid produced locally in the fetal membranes at parturition, and the interaction between cortisol and SAA1 in the feed-forward induction of SAA1 expression in human amnion fibroblasts. Results showed that cortisol-induced SAA1 expression in a concentration-dependent manner, which was greatly enhanced by SAA1 despite modest induction of SAA1 expression by itself. Mechanism studies revealed that the induction of SAA1 expression by cortisol and SAA1 was blocked by either the transcription factor STAT3 antagonist AZD0530 or siRNA-mediated knockdown of STAT3. Furthermore, cortisol- and SAA1-induced STAT3 phosphorylation in a sequential order with the induction by SAA1 preceding the induction by cortisol. However, combination of cortisol and SAA1 failed to further intensify the phosphorylation of STAT3. Consistently, cortisol and SAA1 increased the enrichment of STAT3 at the SAA1 promoter. Taking together, this study has demonstrated that cortisol and SAA1 can reinforce each other in the induction of SAA1 expression through sequential phosphorylation of STAT3. The enhancement of cortisol-induced SAA1 expression by SAA1 may lead to excessive SAA1 accumulation resulting in parturition-associated inflammation in the fetal membranes.


2018 ◽  
Vol 170 ◽  
pp. 113-116
Author(s):  
Chih-Chun Yang
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 169 ◽  
pp. 489-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrés Perea
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bingyong Zheng

AbstractForward induction, as defined by Govindan and Wilson (2009. “On Forward Induction.” Econometrica 77:1–28), places a local dominance condition on off-equilibrium beliefs that restricts relevant strategy profiles for an equilibrium outcome to be infinitely more likely than profiles that include irrelevant strategies. Meanwhile, it places no global dominance restrictions and thus leaves open the possibility that a dominated strategy is deemed more likely than strategies dominating it. This paper defines strong forward induction, which improves upon forward induction. We also develop a solution concept called strong forward induction equilibrium that is obtained from iterative application of the strong forward induction criterion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document