narcissistic grandiosity
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

24
(FIVE YEARS 11)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Hoseingholizade ◽  
Mohammad Effatpanah ◽  
Nazanin Mousavi ◽  
Mandana Piryaei ◽  
Ali Mohammad Mousavi

Narcissistic Grandiosity Scale (NGS) measures within-person dynamics of grandiose narcissism in both trait- and state-level and makes it possible to evaluate the grandiosity’s oscillations over time.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Nicole M. Cain ◽  
Callie Jowers ◽  
Mark Blanchard ◽  
Sharon Nelson ◽  
Steven K. Huprich

Theory and research have consistently shown that pathological narcissism can best be described by 2 phenotypic expressions, narcissistic grandiosity and narcissistic vulnerability. The current study sought to examine the specific types of interpersonal problems reported by those high in narcissistic grandiosity and high in narcissistic vulnerability as well as examine the nomological network associated with these 2 manifestations of narcissism. In a sample of university students who completed self-report measures of pathological narcissism, interpersonal problems, depression, self-esteem, malignant self-regard, self-defeating personality disorder symptoms, and anger, we found that narcissistic grandiosity (<i>n</i> = 108) was associated with one distinct interpersonal profile, for example, being overly intrusive in relationships with others, while narcissistic vulnerability (<i>n</i> = 88) was associated with a wider range of interpersonal problems on the interpersonal circumplex. Using cluster analysis, we found 3 interpersonal subtypes associated with narcissistic vulnerability, an intrusive subtype, a cold subtype, and a socially avoidant subtype. Further examination of group differences showed that the 3 interpersonal subtypes associated with narcissistic vulnerability could also be distinguished based on their experience and expression of anger. This suggests the importance of assessing profiles of interpersonal functioning and anger in narcissistic vulnerability. The clinical implications of our results are discussed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 670-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bojana M. Dinić ◽  
Aleksandar Vujić

Abstract. The aim of this research was to explore measurement invariance across samples from Serbia and the USA (Study 1) and to further validate the Serbian adaptation of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory – PNI (Study 2). The results supported the original seven-factor first-order structure as well as the hierarchical structure of the PNI with Narcissistic grandiosity and vulnerability as the second-order factors. Further, scalar invariance between the two versions of the PNI was achieved. Relations between Narcissistic grandiosity and vulnerability and other measures of grandiose and hypersensitive narcissism supported the validity of their scores. Among HEXACO traits, both Narcissistic grandiosity and vulnerability showed substantial negative correlations with Honesty-Humility. The main distinctions between the two aspects of narcissism lie in the positive relations with Neuroticism and negative relations with self-esteem, both of which are higher for Narcissistic vulnerability. The results support good psychometric properties of the PNI scores and add to the PNI’s cross-cultural validity.


Author(s):  
Sulamunn R. M. Coleman ◽  
Michael J. Bernstein ◽  
Jacob A. Benfield ◽  
Joshua M. Smyth

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seth A. Rosenthal ◽  
Jill M. Hooley ◽  
R. Matthew Montoya ◽  
Sander L. van der Linden ◽  
Yulia Steshenko

2019 ◽  
Vol 150 ◽  
pp. 109478
Author(s):  
Kelsey Anello ◽  
Daniel G. Lannin ◽  
Anthony D. Hermann

Author(s):  
Myungsuh Lim

One hundred and eighty-eight participants completed the online questionnaire with items on demographics (age and gender), social exclusion, surveillance use, Facebook addiction, and narcissistic grandiosity. The findings showed that social exclusion was positively associated with Facebook addiction (B = 0.237, p < 0.001) and surveillance use was significantly positively associated with Facebook addiction (B = 0.211, p < 0.01). The surveillance use of Facebook was found to be a significant mediator between the risk of social exclusion on Facebook and Facebook addiction (B = 0.054, CI [0.20, 0.113]). Narcissistic grandiosity significantly moderated the associations between social exclusion and Facebook addiction (B = 0.079, p = 0.012). These findings suggest that the risk of social exclusion could serve as facilitator of Facebook addiction depending on narcissistic grandiosity.


Assessment ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 487-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seth A. Rosenthal ◽  
Jill M. Hooley ◽  
R. Matthew Montoya ◽  
Sander L. van der Linden ◽  
Yulia Steshenko

Measures of self-esteem frequently conflate two independent constructs: high self-esteem (a normative positive sense of self) and narcissistic grandiosity (a nonnormative sense of superiority). Confusion stems from the inability of self-report self-esteem scales to adequately distinguish between high self-esteem and narcissistic grandiosity. The Narcissistic Grandiosity Scale (NGS) was developed to clarify this distinction by providing a measure of narcissistic grandiosity. In this research, we refined the NGS and demonstrated that NGS scores exhibit good convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity relative to scores on theoretically relevant measures. NGS scores, when used as simultaneous predictors with scores on a self-esteem measure, related more strongly to phenomena linked to narcissistic grandiosity (e.g., competitiveness, overestimating one’s attractiveness, lack of shame), whereas self-esteem scores related more strongly to phenomena crucial to individuals’ well-being (e.g., higher levels of optimism and satisfaction with life, and lower levels of depression, worthlessness, and hostility). The NGS provides researchers with a measure to help clarify the distinctions between narcissistic grandiosity and high self-esteem, as well as other facets of narcissism, both in theory and as predictors of important real-life characteristics.


2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 913-924 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Edershile ◽  
William C. Woods ◽  
Brinkley M. Sharpe ◽  
Michael L. Crowe ◽  
Joshua D. Miller ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document