tooth segmentation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

54
(FIVE YEARS 29)

H-INDEX

8
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
pp. 103865
Author(s):  
Eman Shaheen ◽  
André Leite ◽  
Khalid Ayidh Alqahtani ◽  
Andreas Smolders ◽  
Adriaan Van Gerven ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Xiaotong Jiang ◽  
Benlian Xu ◽  
Mingqiang Wei ◽  
Ke Wu ◽  
Siyuan Yang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Rui Yang ◽  
Amir H. Abdi ◽  
Atabak Eghbal ◽  
Edward Wang ◽  
Khanh Linh Tran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 69 ◽  
pp. 101949
Author(s):  
Zhiming Cui ◽  
Changjian Li ◽  
Nenglun Chen ◽  
Guodong Wei ◽  
Runnan Chen ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Rui Yang ◽  
Amir H. Abdi ◽  
Atabak Eghbal ◽  
Edward Wang ◽  
Khanh Linh Tran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Viktoria Trelenberg-Stoll ◽  
Dieter Drescher ◽  
Michael Wolf ◽  
Kathrin Becker

Abstract Background Orthodontic root resorptions are frequently investigated in small animals, and micro-computed tomography (μCT) enables volumetric comparison. Despite, due to overlapping histograms from dentine and bone, accurate quantification of root resorption is challenging. The present study aims at (i) validating a novel automated approach for tooth segmentation (ATS), (ii) to indicate that matching of contralateral teeth is eligible to assess orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) and root resorption (RR), (iii) and to apply the novel approach in an animal trial performing orthodontic tooth movement. Methods The oral apparatus of three female mice were scanned with a μCT. The first molars of each jaw and animal were segmented using ATS (test) and manually (control), and contralateral volumes were compared. Agreement in root volumes and time efficiency were assessed for method validation. In another n = 14 animals, the left first upper molar was protracted for 11 days at 0.5 N, whereas the contralateral molar served as control. Following ATS, OTM and RR were estimated. Results ATS was significantly more time efficient compared to the manual approach (81% faster, P < 0.01), accurate (volume differences: − 0.01 ± 0.04 mm3), and contralateral roots had comparable volumes. Protracted molars had significantly lower root volumes (P = 0.03), whereas the amount of OTM failed to reveal linear association with RR (P > 0.05). Conclusions Within the limits of the study, it was demonstrated that the combination of ATS and registration of contralateral jaws enables measurements of OTS and associated RR in μCT scans.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document