snowshoe hares
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

297
(FIVE YEARS 26)

H-INDEX

36
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2021 ◽  
Vol 151 ◽  
pp. 111278
Author(s):  
Francisco J. Ariza-Hernandez ◽  
Luis M. Martin-Alvarez ◽  
Martin P. Arciga-Alejandre ◽  
Jorge Sanchez-Ortiz

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanie L Kennah ◽  
Michael J.L Peers ◽  
Eric Vander Wal ◽  
Yasmine N. Majchrzak ◽  
Allyson K Menzies ◽  
...  

Climate warming is causing asynchronies between animal phenology and environments. Mismatched traits, like coat color change mismatched with snow, can decrease survival. However, coat change does not serve a singular adaptive benefit of camouflage, and alternate coat change functions may confer advantages that supersede mismatch costs. We found that mismatch reduced rather than increased, autumn mortality risk of snowshoe hares in Yukon by 86.5 %. We suggest that the increased coat insulation and lower metabolic rates of winter acclimatized hares confer energetic advantages to white mismatched hares that reduce their mortality risk. We found that white mismatched hares forage 17-77 minutes less per day than matched brown hares between 0 and -10° C, thus lowering their predation risk and increasing survival. We found no effect of mismatch on spring mortality risk, where mismatch occurred at warmer temperatures, suggesting a potential temperature limit where the costs of conspicuousness outweigh energetic benefits.


Oecologia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophia G. Lavergne ◽  
Charles J. Krebs ◽  
Alice J. Kenney ◽  
Stan Boutin ◽  
Dennis Murray ◽  
...  

Oecologia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 195 (4) ◽  
pp. 949-957
Author(s):  
Michael J. L. Peers ◽  
Jody R. Reimer ◽  
Yasmine N. Majchrzak ◽  
Allyson K. Menzies ◽  
Emily K. Studd ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 134 (4) ◽  
pp. 342-352
Author(s):  
Arthur T. Bergerud ◽  
Brian E. McLaren ◽  
William Dalton ◽  
Lo Camps ◽  
Heather Butler ◽  
...  

Observations from 1974-2016 of Caribou (Rangifer tarandus) on the archipelago that comprises Slate Islands Provincial Park allowed us to infer direct and indirect effects of the arrival of Wolf (Canis lupus) pairs in winters of 1993-94 and 2003-04. Wolves created conditions that led to the near demise of Caribou from the islands, including some, but not all, behavioural changes in Caribou consistent with avoiding predators. Caribou on SIPP did not appear to return to calving locations near shoreline areas, nor use them to escape from Wolves by entering water. Shorelines and locations of Patterson Island near a Wolf-occupied Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) den were the most common Caribou kill locations. Wolves also functionally shifted the ecosystem in Slate Islands Provincial Park via direct and indirect effects on North American Beavers (Castor canadensis), Red Foxes and Snowshoe Hares (Lepus americanus).


2020 ◽  
Vol 249 ◽  
pp. 108731
Author(s):  
Evan C. Wilson ◽  
Benjamin Zuckerberg ◽  
M. Zachariah Peery ◽  
Jonathan N. Pauli

2020 ◽  
Vol 196 (3) ◽  
pp. 316-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew R. Jones ◽  
L. Scott Mills ◽  
Jeffrey D. Jensen ◽  
Jeffrey M. Good

Oecologia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 194 (3) ◽  
pp. 301-310
Author(s):  
Alexander V. Kumar ◽  
Marketa Zimova ◽  
James R. Sparks ◽  
L. Scott Mills

Abstract Global reduction in snow cover duration is one of the most consistent and widespread climate change outcomes. Declining snow duration has severe negative consequences for diverse taxa including seasonally color molting species, which rely on snow for camouflage. However, phenotypic plasticity may facilitate adaptation to reduced snow duration. Plastic responses could occur in the color molt phenology or through behavior that minimizes coat color mismatch or its consequences. We quantified molt phenology of 200 wild snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus), and measured microhabitat choice and local snow cover. Similar to other studies, we found that hares did not show behavioral plasticity to minimize coat color mismatch via background matching; instead they preferred colder, snow free areas regardless of their coat color. Furthermore, hares did not behaviorally mitigate the negative consequences of mismatch by choosing resting sites with denser vegetation cover when mismatched. Importantly, we demonstrated plasticity in the initiation and the rate of the molt and established the direct effect of snow on molt phenology; greater snow cover was associated with whiter hares and this association was not due to whiter hares preferring snowier areas. However, despite the observed snow-mediated plasticity in molt phenology, camouflage mismatch with white hares on brown snowless ground persisted and was more frequent during early snowmelt. Thus, we find no evidence that phenotypic plasticity in snowshoe hares is sufficient to facilitate adaptive rescue to camouflage mismatch under climate change.


2020 ◽  
Vol 101 (3) ◽  
pp. 710-717
Author(s):  
Zachary K Lankist ◽  
Christine R Maher

Abstract Heterospecific competitors can use chemical cues left by dominant species to avoid aggressive interactions. Similarly, prey avoid chemical cues from predators at feeding sites, presumably because risk of death outweighs the benefit of food. This study addressed the lack of information regarding mammals’ avoidance of direct cues from competitors and also examined how indirect cues, i.e., vegetative cover, affect foraging behavior. To test if chemical cues and vegetative cover alter the number of visits by prey species and time spent at feeding plots, we observed snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus) in plots containing coyote (Canis latrans; predator) and moose (Alces alces; competitor) urine across a spectrum of vegetation densities. Snowshoe hares significantly reduced number of visits to plots that contained coyote or moose urine. In plots treated with coyote urine, number of visits decreased significantly as plots became more densely vegetated. Neither chemical cues nor vegetation density affected time spent in plots. These results suggest that competition between snowshoe hares and moose has selected for an avoidance response. This study also reinforces the idea that an increase in vegetation density could prove disadvantageous to prey, perhaps because some predators use dense vegetation to their advantage.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document